Search results

So it was only the independents that were at fault?

So they damaged the reputation of the directors of the Wests Tigers to oust Richo while saying he had their full support? These incompetent people are who you want running our club?

You have the 2 Hardgroves mixed up mate.

So I suggest the other 5 were terrible at their role. Are any of them still involved?

So you are saying that the 2 member voted directors were able call the shots on a 7 seat board. That is some effort and probably calls into question the 5 other directors.

Yeah that is exactly what HBG does.

No I want a successful Wests Tigers. Something HBG hasn't been able to achieve.

I still think we are a quality prop shirt but have us making the 8.

I know we have different points of view, but I like to discuss openly and honestl

That's the grants to Balmain and the Magpies. As I said they do sponsor some junior clubs in the inner west

$170k into Balmain and $230k into the Magpies. Sponsor varies clubs as well.

So your problem is I have an avenue for others to hear my opinion? Sounds petty.

Because investigations found no wrongdoing on his behalf. You always leave that part out.of your posts. Why don't you mention that in any of your posts?

That's great for you, my opinion is that the HBG can not provide us with the stability to ensure long term success. So I will continue to speak out until that is rectified.

So why do you refuse to mention that the investigation found no wrongdoing towards him?

It's already been posted in this thread. But I do agree, it's not the issue to focus on.

I think they will be successful, that makes the HBG decision to remove those responsible for the first improvement at the club in a decade even poorer.

Bulldogs put in $9m in 2024.

I'd agree if others weren't starting at $25-30m. If $1.7m is significant, so is being behind $5m.

Sponsorship, merch, ticketing all far outstrip the owners contribution. The player salary comparison was an indication of how much they are contributing.