Search results

3 - ET 2 - Grant 1 - Moses

The Sheenius….he's alive! Why get rid of Brooks? He's playing alright.

Absolute legend. Has added so much to our side in both attack and defence. Hope we can find a way to keep him.

I find it strange that the first half the ball mostly went to Moses, and the second half the ball mostly went to Brooks. Wasn't really looking at who was distributing but there needs to be a better balance. Specifically that last 10 minutes, when it was clear Brooks was beginning to make bad...

Apparently 8 errors in that second half. Did not play nearly as well. Even though we lost, I was very proud of the effort. As a whole, the team is going much better. Scramble defence and line speed has definitely improved. Top 8 is very possible IMO.

That was just poor defence, could've easily stopped that one.

It's nice to be ahead on goalkicking for once

Moses is having a good game, particularly kicking wise. Would like to see the ball go to Brooks a bit more to keep them guessing. Grant and Lawrence have been going great and Taylor's on point as usual. Kasiano and Williams are the big worries. If we can contain them then we may win, but...

As much as I dislike putting Lawrence at 6, moving Moses to 1 would be the best option. He plays similar to a fullback anyway, and he started some games in 2014 there and did well (ironically against the Bulldogs). That way, his shocking reads in defence won't be sighted (hopefully) and he can...

I think you're reading into it a bit too much.

Keep in mind Brooks had two line-break assists that led to tries and was kicking quite well (aside from one shocker I think). Though I think Moses had a good game too. But I've always rated Brooks as the better one and still do.

What a waste of money.

I thought Moses was very poor, constantly rushing out of the line. I just don't get it. Hold the line and slide, you're much more likely to stop the play when you have a forward on your inside that can help with the tackle. Rushing out of the line just creates massive holes that any reserve...

Ya know, normally I don't agree with Taylor, but this time I think he's right. Granted, I only caught that second half when we already had a good lead and never lost it. Even still, Penrith got all the penalties and had tons of field position, and the players just kept turning up and making a...

Didn't catch the first half so this is just going off the second. 3\. Lawrence 2\. Woods 1\. Lovett Thought all the forwards really stood up. Lovett made some really critical tackles. Obviously Teddy had a good game, Brooks looked strong. Farah looked good too. Up until the last 10 minutes...

While MCK may not be killing it at NSW Cup level, he looked solid in first grade. I'd like to see him given 3-4 games in a row in the same position just to see what he could do.

I'd be a little hesitant in having Teddy signed to a 5 year deal, but I'd certainly take it over a 2 year one. I think about 4 years would be ideal. And he's definitely worth $1 million + a season. Some clubs might even throw some ridiculous money his way. It seems he wants to stay though...

I think Teddy and Brooks will have good games but ultimately we'll lose. Panthers are probably the best team at offloading and offloads seem to trouble our squad so much. For some reason, our boys never seem to wrap the ball up, leaving massive holes in the defensive line when offloads get away...

To be fair, his debut was against a Dragons side missing a huge chunk of their starting team. Easy to look good against reserve graders, not so much against seasoned NRL players, let alone the Storm.

So who actually turned the game off? Haha.