Search results

  1. S

    THE 4......THREAD

    ????
  2. S

    THE 4......THREAD

    Mate, that argument would only hold water if there was a queue of clubs waiting to sign him and he chose to stay with Tigers. He's had a contract on the table for over 12 months and only signed last week (presumably after there was no interest shown elsewhere).
  3. S

    THE 4......THREAD

    Mate, ultimately I think if you believe Brooks is better than Moses than I don't think there's too much I can say that will change your mind. Its a personal opinion thing. I think Moses has proven himself far more consistent than Brooks. Brooks tends to go missing in parts of some games I've...
  4. S

    THE 4......THREAD

    Mate, the recruitment policy has been to retain the big 4\. We moved on players of the calibre of Robbie Farah and Blake Austin to let these big 4 develop and run the team. Then we fail to sign 3 out of the four! Its one thing to lose players when you're going to be over the cap, but if you're...
  5. S

    THE 4......THREAD

    I can play the insult game too buddy! Brooks IMO was the weakest of the "big 4". I hope he proves me wrong too! I'm not death riding the team. I think its very poor management when you make 4 blokes a priority for retention and only end up signing the "weakest" out of the 4!
  6. S

    THE 4......THREAD

    Only reason Brooks signed is he had no other options elsewhere, otherwise he too would have been on the "bus" leaving Concord. The whole recruitment policy over the last 3 years has been a debacle. Woods has been a lone hand in the front row for a couple years. Taylor alone can't be held...
  7. S

    THE 4......THREAD

    The board and CEO should resign or be sacked. Brooks was the only player out of the "Big Four" that if lost to another club would not have impacted us that much IMO, yet this dud is the only one we managed to secure. Moses gone, teddy gone, Woodsy gone… half a dozen others will probably follow...
  8. S

    Jason Taylor ...THREAD...

    The stupidity of the Farah v JT debate is that even if you believe Farah is "crap" it's JT that should shoulder the responsibility for playing him. Nothing in his 900k contract that says he should be starting or playing certain minutes etc. you can bet your bottom dollar if any of his potential...
Back
Top