Search results

Pretty good typo

He is a petulant child

Read in the papers today that Galvin touches the ball more than any other half in the game, and takes the most runs, but Bulldogs have the worst attack in the league. Galvin touches the ball more than most hookers do. Interesting that anyone is surprised by that: this was 100% his tactic when...

Also... not only are Wests Leagues Club the owners, it's their mandate (literally in their constitution) that they must foster and support local rugby league.

How good BTW is the Twal offload 2026, not just getting an arm free but quality offloads in traffic.

He's got a soft spot for the Tigers, used to live near Leichhardt Oval I believe. I actually thought he and Kevvie were quite complimentary of the performance this week.

SHOULD be a season-defining game, the challenge is we often have games like this early, e.g. Eels 2025, Sharks 2024. I dunno, something feels different this year, more steel than I am used to seeing.

Acai bowls, that will do me. The bloke runs and lifts heavy all day, way more than the average joe... he can almost certainly neck a few sweets and not be significantly impacted. Esp. as it's sugar, he'd burn a tonne of it off at training. Not ideal but his calorie intake would already be...

St George not allowed present their strategy to Bula directly, confirmed as currently off-limits by the NRL, so they instead do it via the newspaper (marquee club-building player). What a farce.

Sorry guys I've been only keeping half an eye on the offseason chat, where is Latu Fainu up to?

I wonder if eventually enough clubs will pilfer the Penrith ranks that they finally run out of first grade-quality reserves.

I think 2 is fair, I'm happy for that to be a standard.

It was interesting that the second-half Panthers were not quite as good as the second-half Tigers, and that's why we ran away with it. I can't make much comment about whether that bodes well for our depth, because I didn't really recognise who the Panthers threw on. Also we kept throwing our...

I know right, HBG being forced to make payouts for their own inept decisions.

No, the whole argument is based on the fact that Tigers have been a basketcase loser side for 15 years and HBG have been the majority owners for most of that period. Once you have sacked multiple coaches, replaced the roster a bunch of times, turned over the CEO and Chairman... at some point...

I've have to watch it to find out

That's a pretty tired argument. If you find yourself in the minority against a large number of voices, perhaps the "commonality" of sense has shifted away from you.

Perhaps, but one side of the argument is supported by evidence, the other is not.

Very Trumpian... "no actually I think they are doing a great job" amidst the flaming train wreck.

Burden of proof fallacy