Benji Marshall On Field Arrogance in Witness Box

joe_s_magpies

New member
DID you see Benji Marshall against the Eels on Sunday, bobbing and weaving like a cork in the ocean to score that try before half-time?
You need a heady mix of supreme self-confidence and arrogance to do something like that.

The same is required if you are sitting in the witness box at Downing Centre Local Court, as the defendant in an assault case, for an indictable offence that could land you in the Big House, yet you still have the stones to roll out a smart-arse line.

"Is it your job to be physical and to go out on the field to hurt people?" Police prosecutor Sgt Rick Mansley asked the Wests Tigers five-eighth.

The quick-draw reply: "No, it's my job to make the outside backs look good." Kaboom!

While the remark cracked up most of the courtroom it is exactly that type of smugness that polarises opinion when it comes to Benjamin Quentin Marshall.

He was later acquitted of the charges, having pleaded not guilty to assaulting Soliman Naimey outside of McDonald's in George St on March 5 this year but in the court of public opinion the jury is still out.

Marshall is a cocky little character on the field and that is OK because every playmaker worth his black designer sunnies needs to feel bulletproof. If you don't have that mojo, you struggle. Just ask Jamie Soward.

Surprisingly, though, Marshall oozed the same self-assuredness when it came to his big day in court with his freedom - not the game - on the line.

At times he appeared to deliver his testimony like he was deflecting tricky questions from reporters in the rooms after a game.

Sgt Mansley asked him if he "wouldn't have gotten offended by Mr Naimey saying to you something like [Darren] Lockyer's better than you?" "Why would I?" Marshall snapped. "He's my hero."

When asked by his own barrister Geoff Bellew, SC, if he had intended to hurt Naimey, Marshall's response smacked of the type of hubris you might expect from him.

"If I'd wanted to, I would have punched him."

When Bellew asked him about being approached by "patrons" out in public, Benji almost sighed like it was all part of the job.

"Absolutely yes," he said. "It happens every day."

And then, right there on the steps outside court, Marshall delivered a statement and the one-liners just kept on comin'.

"I want to thank the Wests Tigers for their support, the NRL and my teammates that the coach wouldn't let come and sit in court," he said.

"It's been a pretty tough time and I'm very, very pleased with the outcome. Now let's play rugby league."

Whoever advised him that might be a wise thing to say, having just been found not guilty of an assault charge, should come up with better scripts. Like thanking the coach. The one who has stood by him since he was a teenager.

Tim Sheens would've laughed off the comment because he knows Marshall like a son but the public aren't so well versed.

Some of his peers, too.

The Daily Telegraph delivered the news of the not guilty verdict to a few leading players, and when advised of his remarks afterwards they knowingly laughed. "No surprise," said one. "Why would you not just say thank you and get out of there?"

The not guilty verdict is a win for the game because Marshall and the Wests Tigers can now play out the rest of the season unhindered by this episode.

You know McBenji will have the stones for it.

Source😀ailytelegraph.com.au
 
You can imagine he was pretty elated to be vindicated. He has been rock solid all year despite this and all the other rumors etc. Takes a pretty special person i think. He just keeps getting better and better as he matures….still think he has some maturing left.
 
@PYMBLEPETE said:
I'm sure Benji will be very grateful for the Telegraph's gratuitous and condescending advice.

Where do they get off !! He was under oath, he has to tell the truth :smiley: :smiley:
 
"Is it your job to be physical and to go out on the field to hurt people?" Police prosecutor Sgt Rick Mansley asked the Wests Tigers five-eighth.

The quick-draw reply: "No, it's my job to make the outside backs look good." Kaboom!

Such a ridiculous question from the prosecution. It got the tongue in cheek answer it deserved!
 
The Telegraph is a disgrace, and this article is just one minor example of why. They ought to be ashamed of themselves for publishing this kind of snide, innuendo-riddled bullshit (though of course anyone associated with such a gutter rag clearly has no shame to start with). The piece drips with disappointment that Benji wasn't found guilty, thus denying this miserable excuse for a "news"paper the opportunity to run yet more league-bashing crap to pander to the knuckle-dragging morons who feed on that sort of dribble.

Personally I think it's embarrassing that Australia hasn't yet twigged that the whole Murdoch organisation is an amoral cesspit of prurience and corruption. These people are a blight on our society and anyone who supports them with their dollars would do best to reconsider.
 
Who the [This word has been automatically removed] is Andrew Webster! What an absolute moron! When benji was asked about is it his Job to hurt ppl of purse he gave a cheeky answer it was a stupid question! Get a life Webster u clown!
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
 
@2041 said:
The Telegraph is a disgrace, and this article is just one minor example of why. They ought to be ashamed of themselves for publishing this kind of snide, innuendo-riddled s*** (though of course anyone associated with such a gutter rag clearly has no shame to start with). The piece drips with disappointment that Benji wasn't found guilty, thus denying this miserable excuse for a "news"paper the opportunity to run yet more league-bashing crap to pander to the knuckle-dragging morons who feed on that sort of dribble.

Personally I think it's embarrassing that Australia hasn't yet twigged that the whole Murdoch organisation is an amoral cesspit of prurience and corruption. These people are a blight on our society and anyone who supports them with their dollars would do best to reconsider.

This is spot on 2041, I couldn't agree with you more.

"Muck-Raker-At-Large" Rothfield would have just about thrown his computer out the window when he found out he wasn't guilty. They didn't get the verdict they were hoping on, so they did the next best thing and attempt to question Benji's character instead. The Terrorgraph has long been a glorified supermarket tabloid.
 
Typical Telegraph.

Not happy coming into finals time unless they have a story to deathride the game about.

It was actually a clever way to respond to a question that would have been asked in an aggresive style typical of the night law school style of ex cops moved to the prosecutors chair. It took the sting from the question, answered in a disarming fashion and the response it licited from the gallery served only to make the prosecutor appear foolish and, in conjunction with the tone of the 000 call, given the presiding magistrate a easy path to suspect why the case had been taken this far.
 
Have a read of the Herald article. Completely different angle on Marshall's comments. It is tall poppy syndrome by the Terror, pure and simple.

I thought his comment, "let's play rugby league" was brilliant. Effectively, it abruptly ended the plaintiff's 15 minutes of fame and put the rugby league public's focus primarily where it should be - the football field.
 
@smeghead said:
Typical Telegraph.

Not happy coming into finals time unless they have a story to deathride the game about.

It was actually a clever way to respond to a question that would have been asked in an aggresive style typical of the night law school style of ex cops moved to the prosecutors chair. It took the sting from the question, answered in a disarming fashion and the response it licited from the gallery served only to make the prosecutor appear foolish and, in conjunction with the tone of the 000 call, given the presiding magistrate a easy path to suspect why the case had been taken this far.

Spot on Smeg. Make no mistake, everything Benji said and did in court would have been thoroughly planned by Bellew and his team well in advance. The golden rule (as a former professional witness myself) in these things is never get involved in an argument with the opposing lawyers if you can at all avoid it. The prosecution tried to paint him in a corner and skillfully he answers the question. We have to remember the guy is up on an assault charge so you want him to appear as calm and laidback as possible while not being disrespectful.

I'd certainly much rather have Benji the way it is than the robotic answers suggested by the (of course un-named) peers. As usual this rag of a paper takes a few comments out of context and runs a story lacking in truth. There is a reason I have never purchased a copy of the Smelegraph for many years now. It is an embarrassment to this city. The sooner we get than inquiry into News the better.
 
Andrew Webster wrote that article. He is the clown that wrote a baseless article about Benji being abusive to a woman on a flight from Queensland. Webster has an anti-Benji agenda and will put the boot in whenever an opportunity presents itself. He is as transparent as polished glass, and as relevant as Susan Boyle on a "Big Day Out" line up.

Everything I've seen and heard from Benji since the media first shone the spot light on him back in 2003, has shown him to be confident rather than cocky. He is respectful, articulate, honest, and forth-coming with his opinions.

The fact that Webster bags Marshall for his tongue in cheek reference to Sheens not allowing team mates to be in court with him, shows that Webster has missed the point all together. That's what happens when you have hidden agendas and are looking to interpret things in a way that will aid that agenda. The point Benji was making here is that his team mates would have loved to be in court supporting him, but were under instruction by the coach not to do so. That's fair enough given that we are three weeks away from a Finals Series and the team focus should be on that.

Between Rothfield, Webster, and other geese honking around that transparently biased publication, it's a wonder the Telegraph isn't merely sold in pet shops as a budgie cage accessory.
 
You can almost guarantee one of the "peers" was that miserable old man Hindmarsh. He hates everything Wests Tigers and is quite happy to rip in any time he is given the opportunity. I will lose a big pay day if the Titans dont get the spoon but to watch Hindmarsh get it would make it almost bearable
 
You can also add Josh Massoud to that illustrious group who wrote that famous article about Benji and Robbie before the Knights game last year that earned him a gob full from all the players when he walked into the change rooms after the game. He was sent packing with his tail between his legs from the players tirade as he exited the change rooms. He hasn't been sighted in a Tigers change room since.
 
Suck on that telegraph….you didnt get the guilty verdict you so craved...now you will have to write about his heroics on the field.

However will you cope???
 
Just a reminder for people to lay off deliberately swearing and disguised swearing please.
 
Andrew Webster is a pig.

No true fan of NRL (or sport in general) could ever write in such a sarcastic and derisive manner about a hero like Benji.

The court result is momentous but this article has ruined my whole day and made me angry.

Webster can go and get …......
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top