Breaking news: HBG takeover

All this shemozzle over a jersey and colour tone that the majority of the fans love.

Crazy stuff!


wt_jersey_2025-jpg.30458
 

Attachments

  • WT_Jersey_2025.jpg
    WT_Jersey_2025.jpg
    151.3 KB · Views: 177
FFS you didn't even know that HBG had representatives on the WT board. You don’t even know the basic facts of the underlying story.

You’ve done what you’ve always done which is spout your opinion about something you have no clue about, and when you get exposed for the stupid arse clown that you are, you double down to avoid facing the embarrassment.
Nah, everyone else is a sheep and an inbecile 😂
 
FFS you didn't even know that HBG had representatives on the WT board. You don’t even know the basic facts of the underlying story.

You’ve done what you’ve always done which is spout your opinion about something you have no clue about, and when you get exposed for the stupid arse clown that you are, you double down to avoid facing the embarrassment.
They are not informed, do you understand plain English?
 
very clear they have no idea how the boards work. wouldn’t engage further guys
gonna watch the matilda’s play because i need a new sport to support now
😢
 
You can’t educate imbeciles Tito, but I will keep up the good fight.
You’re the imbecile mate ! The point of having HBG delegates is to provide throughput and clarity between the board using Deniss the current elected rep as a conduit for all information.
To stop for example , Joe blogs from HBG ringing the CEO and demanding We resign Nofa because my daughter thinks he’s a good bloke . That’s the type of shit that was going on when HBG had “clarity” .
 
I’m not discrediting the jersey claim, so don’t misunderstand the tone of my question. Just want to understand. If Rod Stewart and co have the power to sack board members, why did they not have final say over jersey designs? They own the joint don’t they? Whose rubber stamping these things?
 
FFS you didn't even know that HBG had representatives on the WT board. You don’t even know the basic facts of the underlying story.

You’ve done what you’ve always done which is spout your opinion about something you have no clue about, and when you get exposed for the stupid arse clown that you are, you double down to avoid facing the embarrassment.
Funnily enough I open my ears and listen to both sides of the airy unlike yourself who does not want to find out your opinion could be wrong.
 
You’re the imbecile mate ! The point of having HBG delegates is to provide throughput and clarity between the board using Deniss the current elected rep as a conduit for all information.
To stop for example , Joe blogs from HBG ringing the CEO and demanding We resign Nofa because my daughter thinks he’s a good bloke . That’s the type of shit that was going on when HBG had “clarity” .
You obviously do not understand English, they were not advised of information in which they expected and were entitled to be consulted on.
You believe what you want to believe.
 
I’m not discrediting the jersey claim, so don’t misunderstand the tone of my question. Just want to understand. If Rod Stewart and co have the power to sack board members, why did they not have final say over jersey designs? They own the joint don’t they? Whose rubber stamping these things?
Independent board until their knickers get twisted too tight.
 
I've got the solution, the tigers can go west! Appeasing the Wests contingent but not all the way west, more like an inner west, thus placating the Balmain faithful and so spawning the Adelaide whatevers!
 
Funnily enough I open my ears and listen to both sides of the airy unlike yourself who does not want to find out your opinion could be wrong.

No you don’t, you dense [This word has been automatically removed]wit. You’ve literally been shown how you’re wrong and yet you keep doubling down on the exact same line.

You have no original thought, you’re just a dumb bot repeating the HBG lines.
 
WWWWEEEEEEE!!!

This thread is a fun one.

In regards to this stupid colour thing I asked Googs AI what colour would a tiger and a magpie would morph into.

A hypothetical creature resulting from a tiger and a magpie morph would likely have a striking, contrasting coloration featuring bold patches of black and white, and orange stripes or accents.
The colouring is derived from the distinct plumage of the magpie and the fur of the tiger:
Magpies typically exhibit a stark, iridescent black and white plumage pattern.
Tigers are known for their vibrant orange or reddish-brown base colour and prominent black stripes.
The resulting morphed creature would be a hypothetical blend, combining these elements into a unique black, white, and orange striped pattern.
 
Watch the Daniel Paton statement you ignorant imbecile.
When you are happy to pour millions into the club annually and not be given the courtesy tu be consulted about major decisions, maybe then you will understand.
I don't know much about accounting but after having a brief look at the Holman Barnes 2024 annual report I think millions is slightly overestimating.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20251202-211040.png
    Screenshot_20251202-211040.png
    447 KB · Views: 8
  • Screenshot_20251202-210951.png
    Screenshot_20251202-210951.png
    450.5 KB · Views: 8
  • Screenshot_20251202-210659.png
    Screenshot_20251202-210659.png
    291.4 KB · Views: 8
Back
Top