So why would you remove 4 board members in that scenario?
Interesting as I also got the impression he is not capable of driving agendas on a board.
I don’t know, that’s the million dollar question at the moment.
Well obviously there has been miscommunication or sabotage somewhere along the line.
Spot on. It's not normal. The only acceptable answer would be if the infependant board and Richo were working to organise a deal in some way to split and sell up to Easts Tigers. That would be a 1 million to 1 chance that's why they did it. I could fully understand and would agree with HBG doing what they did, they would want to protect they're "asset". I guarantee that conspiracy isn't what's happened. What has happened more than likely is Romero was ousted, once things settled at HBG and those who ousted her consolidated their positions and felt confident they were safe, they turned to the Tigers to undo the results of the Barnier report, no doubt cause they disagree the Tigers should be independant and are probarbly rusted on Wests Magpies dinosaurs. Its deadset a game of thrones at HBG. I also believe the jersey talk, i think theyre that petty, the reason I do is cause the last 4 - 5 years our home strip was predominantly black. Which is strange cause I can't ever remember seeing a black tiger.
Thank God we have you here as the voice of reason. Apologies for jumping to conclusions.
I'm pretty sure it's corporate law. Any sitting board member sole responsibility is to the group or organisation of whatever board they're on.
I specifically remember being called paranoid when all the podcasts and forums got togeather when the three HBG directors were stood down and there was talk Romero wanted to wind back the implementation of the review. The whole forum was fuming and there were a handful that said the petitions did nothing, HBG were always going to implement the findings. Garbage, Romero signed off on it cause she put herself in a corner when she helped remove the 3 directors and knew reneging on the review findings would bring way too much heat at that time. So other debenture holders get togeather and oust her, wait for the heat to die down, invent a cockemamy story and undo what they never wanted done originally and what Romero was unable to undo 12 months ago. Where are the handful of formers who were telling Joel, Cochise and all the others who worked their arses off last year on the podcasts, petitions and forums to get exposure to the situation last year, calling them paranoid and saying they didn't achieve anything cause HBG never intended to not honour the review. Where are they now. Where's the apologies. 12 months later the proof is there for all to see. It's blatantly obvious imo this would have been done 12 months ago had no blow back been applied.
You're dead right mate. Richo said the same thing to us. Machiavellian was the word used. Jan last year.
Is it history or continuation? More of the same from the same...can't see it being a one off and totally separate coincidence. You're too old to be that niave.
