I’ve never quite understood how the multiple captain idea is more effective? Is the concept designed to promote leadership by giving more team members positional authority so that others will more readily follow? Having a snowballing effect on leaders and followers?
And watch Dead Poets society before every game
I said "if". You don't think if Luai gets the Tigers across the line with another premiership he wouldn't be included one day as an immortal of the game after the disaster we've been after the last 12 years.
It won’t be him on his own.
He’s gunna win us a GF and become an immortal they tell me. He’s worth a 1000 and 64 pages if he pulls that off.
One hundred percent it will be a team effort, it will have to centre on him though if it were to ever happen, he would have to be the leader and driver of the standards set. Like Thurston was at the Cowboys. That's why I it did happen Luai would get all the accolades for it I reckon.
It's never been done before, for a good reason. It's so bloody hard. I think naturally people would find a way to take the credit away from him though even if it did happen. Sort of like when people said they should have picked burton over luai long-term, or that no kikau next to luai would be the undoing of him, or that he relies on cleary (even though his best footy in reality has been played WITHOUT nathan - evidenced by origin, samoa, and his form at penrith this year)
If that is true, he must also cop all the criticism if it fails. Do you agree?
Well only some people agree.
I tend to put players into one of two buckets. Part of the solution or part of the problem.
Most of the Squad you mean?
Id agree except being in the positive bucket should and does not exclude him from criticism for mine.
Go for your life, he had a poor game against Parramatta.
Yep like the pompous idiot you're replying too when he said all he's done is lead us to two spoons.
In years gone by I would agree.
