Krisnan Inu

Yes, he's one of those players that will make mistakes, but will also pull off the freakish plays. Too good to not be playing first grade in my opinion.
 
I would sign him here only so we would never have to play against him again
He saves his good games for us it seems
I thought he went ok especially his defence on Matai
He smashed him a few times
 
I thought he played better in the GF than he did against us. He didn't breach our defense like he did a couple of times today and his defence on Mattai today was strong.

All he did against us was to go up for a bomb, miss it but knock it back (according to the official story) then lie on his face while Lote paddled it back to him. Then he made two attempts to get the ball across the line and succeeded with the second one. Last week the Warriors scored again from a bomb he muffed, but today he muffed two and the bounce went Manly's way.

I think he's over rated.
 
@Original Magpie said:
Is he first grade standard?

He's an international

Today he made some simple errors that cost the warriors the game

He made some errors which comes with pressure when youre behind in a GF, he didnt cost them the game
 
@innsaneink said:
@Original Magpie said:
Is he first grade standard?

He's an international

Today he made some simple errors that cost the warriors the game

He made some errors which comes with pressure when youre behind in a GF, he didnt cost them the game

He was an International

His two dropped balls cost the warriors the game
 
@Original Magpie said:
@innsaneink said:
@Original Magpie said:
Is he first grade standard?

He's an international

Today he made some simple errors that cost the warriors the game

He made some errors which comes with pressure when youre behind in a GF, he didnt cost them the game

He was an International

His two dropped balls cost the warriors the game

Original Magpie if you are including the knock on after he made the 30-40 metre run when they showed the reaplay it was a 1 on 1 strip which the Warriors recovered and should of been play on
 
@Original Magpie said:
@innsaneink said:
@Original Magpie said:
Is he first grade standard?

He's an international

Today he made some simple errors that cost the warriors the game

He made some errors which comes with pressure when youre behind in a GF, he didnt cost them the game

He was an International

His two dropped balls cost the warriors the game

Oh OK.
I guess Matulinos bad read on DCE in the first half when he was clearly covered by someone else allowing him to pop it to B Stewart to score doesnt come into the equation eh?

No warriors player cleaning up G Stewarts kick just before HT that lead to DCE's try doesnt count?
\
\
Yeh…they were the first half, all added up to 12 points...only things that happen near the end count eh?
:crazy
 
@innsaneink said:
@Original Magpie said:
@innsaneink said:
@Original Magpie said:
Is he first grade standard?

He's an international

Today he made some simple errors that cost the warriors the game

He made some errors which comes with pressure when youre behind in a GF, he didnt cost them the game

He was an International

His two dropped balls cost the warriors the game

Oh OK.
I guess Matulinos bad read on DCE in the first half when he was clearly covered by someone else allowing him to pop it to B Stewart to score doesnt come into the equation eh?

No warriors player cleaning up G Stewarts kick just before HT that lead to DCE's try doesnt count?
\
\
Yeh…they were the first half, all added up to 12 points...only things that happen near the end count eh?
:crazy

tbh I thought DCE's try shouldnt have been a try due to the obstruction of one of the warriors defenders when manly made the break.

Why do you think Parra let Inu go for? Its either rocks or diamonds with him and 9 times out of 10 its rocks with him.

He had an easy pick up and dropped it cold in goal.
 
He's much like marshall - rocks and diamonds.

Yeh, its all so easy watching on TV

With the so called obstruction, a player is allowed to support a ball runner, he wasnt looking at the covering defense, he was looking at his ball carrier all the time

Glad you now see he didnt cost them the game
 
Inu is a freak who makes too many mistakes.

That sort of player is worthwhile in most teams, unfortunately for Inu, there is some genius players putting loads of pressure on him for 2012.

BTW Parra didn't punt him, the Warriors picked him up on a nice contract which was more than parra were prepared to pay, it is like saying that the storm punted Blair
 
Inu certainly is an enigma - brilliant one minute, a liability the next. I don't think I would want him at the Tigers though - we have too many enigmas already! :laughing:
 
He is certainly one of those players who can make a brilliant play for his side or put the pressure on with a clanger. Had to say I felt for him when he made the break, beat half a dozen players only to spill it when he was tackled.
 
@Goose said:
Inu is a freak who makes too many mistakes.

That sort of player is worthwhile in most teams, unfortunately for Inu, there is some genius players putting loads of pressure on him for 2012.

BTW Parra didn't punt him, the Warriors picked him up on a nice contract which was more than parra were prepared to pay, it is like saying that the storm punted Blair

According to the press(& its never wrong of course !)both Inu & Mateo were offered extremely modest contracts to continue with the Eels,which left them with little choice other than to reluctantly move on
mateo is supposedly still talking about retutning to the eels(!!)
 
@clontarfkid said:
@Goose said:
Inu is a freak who makes too many mistakes.

That sort of player is worthwhile in most teams, unfortunately for Inu, there is some genius players putting loads of pressure on him for 2012.

BTW Parra didn't punt him, the Warriors picked him up on a nice contract which was more than parra were prepared to pay, it is like saying that the storm punted Blair

According to the press(& its never wrong of course !)both Inu & Mateo were offered extremely modest contracts to continue with the Eels,which left them with little choice other than to reluctantly move on
mateo is supposedly still talking about retutning to the eels(!!)

Highly doubt that about Mateo, he put the slipper into the Eels last week.
 
@innsaneink said:
He's much like marshall - rocks and diamonds.

Yeh, its all so easy watching on TV

With the so called obstruction, a player is allowed to support a ball runner, he wasnt looking at the covering defense, he was looking at his ball carrier all the time

Glad you now see he didnt cost them the game

I was at the game yesterday and I watched it live and it was a schoolboy error.

Yes a player is allowed to support a ball runner but he is not allowed to stop a defending player tackle the ball runner

This isnt the first time this season Inu screwed up and cost his team.
 
@innsaneink said:
He's much like marshall - rocks and diamonds.

Yeh, its all so easy watching on TV

With the so called obstruction, a player is allowed to support a ball runner, he wasnt looking at the covering defense, he was looking at his ball carrier all the time

Glad you now see he didnt cost them the game

I was at the game yesterday and I watched it live and it was a schoolboy error.

Yes a player is allowed to support a ball runner but he is not allowed to stop a defending player tackle the ball runner

This isnt the first time this season Inu screwed up and cost his team.
 

Members online

Back
Top