jirskyr
Well-known member
@Fraze23 said in [Operation Farewell Farah cranks up with injured Tiger set to run next week](/post/1054602) said:@jirskyr i don't see how they aren't similar. An injured player putting themself before what's best for the team. Both would be incredibly selfish in nature.
Because one bloke has a fractured leg confirmed via x-ray outside of a match. The other bloke had a twinge assessed on-field.
Both players obviously want to play, one was cleared by a qualified physician, the other has not yet been cleared.
Pretty much every NRL player will play if they can. You don't want a bloke who would prefer to sit on the sidelines.
You can call it selfish, but it's just risk assessment. Was Cooper Cronk selfish for playing 2018 GF with a broken scapula? Sam Burgess with a fractured eye socket? John Sattler with a broken jaw? Pat Richards with ankle ligaments in 2005? Changa Langlands for getting a needle in 1975? They all could have turned out very badly for the team, in an instant, and in Changa's case it did.
Players very regularly play with injury and it's a risk assessment, aka an educated guess, whether or not an injury might get worse or not. There's more guesswork when the injury occurs in warm-up (compared to mid-week), because there is less capacity to assess the injury and less coverage with players named for that match.
So it's not selfish to want to play and it's not selfish to play if the doctor says you are right to go. Players are not doctors, they shouldn't be expected to over-rule physicians.
I don't want a bloke at the Tigers who isn't willing to play injured for the team, even if it turns out badly. That passion and grit differentiates first graders.