Signing Suggestions & Rumours

tigerballs

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Messages
1,220
Wow. And how many JD and cokes had you had prior to watching the game last week? Because that's the only way to explain how ridiculous that statement is. Unbelievable.
He touched the ball 3 times in the first 20 minutes for a knock on, a fumble/turnover and a first tackle kick that went no where. Add that to standing under a kick under the opposition goal posts and not bothering to compete for the ball. If you watched the game at all or even had a basic understanding of the game you wouldn't make this idiotic responses you're becoming famous for.
 

Telltails

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
7,662
So you can't even discuss Douehi without some thinking it is a backhanded dig at Brooks!
Don't think anyone has said that Douehi has played without fault - it was pretty obvious - but there is also plenty of upside in his game which is good for out side moving forward - separate from anything that Brooks offers which is a whole different discussion. Or at least it should be.
 

Batmans Parents

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 13, 2021
Messages
451
Re-watch the first half.
He touched the ball 3 times in the first 20 minutes for a knock on, a fumble/turnover and a first tackle kick that went no where. Add that to standing under a kick under the opposition goal posts and not bothering to compete for the ball. If you watched the game at all or even had a basic understanding of the game you wouldn't make this idiotic responses you're becoming famous for.

That’s adorable. You also conveniently leave out everything he did in the second half as it doesn’t align with your shit-for-brains stance. But that’s not surprising.

Basic understanding of the game? This coming from the fool who backs average pillows like Garner and claimed he was the best centre at the club? You wouldn’t understand the game even if it ran you over and kicked you in the balls.

Try swapping out the JD and cokes for water before watching games and maybe you’ll actually make it to a second half. Clown.
 

Earl

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
8,887
Yeah, His first half wasnt his finest 40 but he was the difference in the second imo.

His first half was terrible. He has been ordinary since coming back. His second half though showed how good he can be,

It should be put in context that when I state he has been ordinary since coming back that he is coming back from an ACL injury.

He is far from a complete player right now but if he gets his game together he will be some player.
 

Jedi_Tiger

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
6,988
His first half was terrible. He has been ordinary since coming back. His second half though showed how good he can be,

It should be put in context that when I state he has been ordinary since coming back that he is coming back from an ACL injury.

He is far from a complete player right now but if he gets his game together he will be some player.
he is fantastic at running the ball AD'S passing and ball playing is not his strength though unfortunately
 

Earl

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
8,887
he is fantastic at running the ball AD'S passing and ball playing is not his strength though unfortunately

I think it's more poor option taking. When he is under pressure though I think he falls back to running it. That is his strength.

Last week he contested a bomb and then put himself back into the line and then gave a short pass to Seyfarth. At other times he would have thrown the cut out pass straight to the winger. He took the right option then.

In the first half he kicked on the first tackle and did all sorts of terrible plays.
 

tigerballs

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Messages
1,220
That’s adorable. You also conveniently leave out everything he did in the second half as it doesn’t align with your shit-for-brains stance. But that’s not surprising.

Basic understanding of the game? This coming from the fool who backs average pillows like Garner and claimed he was the best centre at the club? You wouldn’t understand the game even if it ran you over and kicked you in the balls.

Try swapping out the JD and cokes for water before watching games and maybe you’ll actually make it to a second half. Clown.
He walked through from a set play. What else did he do you absolutely clueless dope. He got tackled about 3 times. That's it. If you think that's a good game you're a soccer fan. And who is a better centre than Garner you imbecile? Like I said, you have no clue about the game. Maybe you should start on the JD's and coke if that's your thing but you don't know anything about football so go join the Spice Girls forum where you might be able to convince someone you know what you're talking about.
 

Batmans Parents

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 13, 2021
Messages
451
He walked through from a set play. What else did he do you absolutely clueless dope. He got tackled about 3 times. That's it. If you think that's a good game you're a soccer fan. And who is a better centre than Garner you imbecile? Like I said, you have no clue about the game. Maybe you should start on the JD's and coke if that's your thing but you don't know anything about football so go join the Spice Girls forum where you might be able to convince someone you know what you're talking about.

So you didn't watch the second half. Right, so sealing the game with a try, Tackled three times? He made over 100m, breaking the line and looked a threat anytime he pretty much touched the ball, played a massive part in our third try by tapping the ball back after a Madden bomb then spreading it for Seyfarth then Toa to score? Need more, you dumb prick?

Kepaoa is clearly a better centre than Garner and if you can't see that, then you're an even bigger spastic then you've let on already.

You clearly don't know your ass from your elbow when it comes to footy. Try watching it sober for once and you might learn a thing or two. Dickhead.
 

tigerballs

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Messages
1,220
So you didn't watch the second half. Right, so sealing the game with a try, Tackled three times? He made over 100m, breaking the line and looked a threat anytime he pretty much touched the ball, played a massive part in our third try by tapping the ball back after a Madden bomb then spreading it for Seyfarth then Toa to score? Need more, you dumb prick?

Kepaoa is clearly a better centre than Garner and if you can't see that, then you're an even bigger spastic then you've let on already.

You clearly don't know your ass from your elbow when it comes to footy. Try watching it sober for once and you might learn a thing or two. Dickhead.
There you go, Kepoa clearly better than Garner. Go play with your dolls.
 

hsvjones

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2011
Messages
3,607
Surely after today's wonderful performance even blind Freddy can see Hasting is our number 1 Priority ahead AD or Brooks..
If we lose Hastings and Brooks we are in for a lot of pain ahead IMO.
With Hastings , AD and Brooks in the team we are such a better team and look dangerous.

AD said he wants to wait until after World Cup to decide which is a concern in itself but does anyone know if Hastings feels the same ??
 
Top