Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Batmans Parents said:
Could be but one thing for sure though is that AD's game is already better than Brooks'. Well, at least to anyone who isn't related to Brooks or has a working pair of eyes....
Click to expand...

Far less scrutinised as well those of us who aren't related to Brooks and have a working set of eyes have noted....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851
Demps said:
We will see him do well when he actually has a 7 that does their work (in Madden) & the handbrake out of the team briefly.
Click to expand...

This is just a load of palava. The Brooks hate is so strong in you.

Doueihi is my favourite player. He is awesome. He has that ability to win us games. Brooks though has never held Doueihi back at all. That excuse is the same trash excuse Brooks fanboys use.

It'd be great to talk about Doueihi on any other player without reference to Brooks all the time.
 
Tigers_Wests said:
Anyone got the full article to post? By all reports Onitoni is a gun for his age group. Still a long way to go...would turn 18 the year Benji takes over I think.
Click to expand...

I forget who but a poster on here who I had the impression was involved in kids rugby league said he was the best player for his age he'd ever seen.
 
Earl said:
This is just a load of palava. The Brooks hate is so strong in you.

Doueihi is my favourite player. He is awesome. He has that ability to win us games. Brooks though has never held Doueihi back at all. That excuse is the same trash excuse Brooks fanboys use.

It'd be great to talk about Doueihi on any other player without reference to Brooks all the time.
Click to expand...
Never said I hated Brooks.
Been waiting for him to come good... for 9 years.

Over the suss obsession from this club and some fans around a clearly low talent half that cannot ice games.

Simple as that.
 
Batmans Parents said:
Wow. And how many JD and cokes had you had prior to watching the game last week? Because that's the only way to explain how ridiculous that statement is. Unbelievable.
Click to expand...
He touched the ball 3 times in the first 20 minutes for a knock on, a fumble/turnover and a first tackle kick that went no where. Add that to standing under a kick under the opposition goal posts and not bothering to compete for the ball. If you watched the game at all or even had a basic understanding of the game you wouldn't make this idiotic responses you're becoming famous for.
 
batboy said:
He's done some good things since coming back.... Plenty of poor things.

I don't think he's been other worldly like his fangroup,
But he wasn't "terrible" last week - That's a bit of a stretch
Click to expand...
Re-watch the first half.
 
So you can't even discuss Douehi without some thinking it is a backhanded dig at Brooks!
Don't think anyone has said that Douehi has played without fault - it was pretty obvious - but there is also plenty of upside in his game which is good for out side moving forward - separate from anything that Brooks offers which is a whole different discussion. Or at least it should be.
 
tigerballs said:
Re-watch the first half.
Click to expand...
tigerballs said:
He touched the ball 3 times in the first 20 minutes for a knock on, a fumble/turnover and a first tackle kick that went no where. Add that to standing under a kick under the opposition goal posts and not bothering to compete for the ball. If you watched the game at all or even had a basic understanding of the game you wouldn't make this idiotic responses you're becoming famous for.
Click to expand...

That’s adorable. You also conveniently leave out everything he did in the second half as it doesn’t align with your shit-for-brains stance. But that’s not surprising.

Basic understanding of the game? This coming from the fool who backs average pillows like Garner and claimed he was the best centre at the club? You wouldn’t understand the game even if it ran you over and kicked you in the balls.

Try swapping out the JD and cokes for water before watching games and maybe you’ll actually make it to a second half. Clown.
 
TCL said:
Yeah, His first half wasnt his finest 40 but he was the difference in the second imo.
Click to expand...

His first half was terrible. He has been ordinary since coming back. His second half though showed how good he can be,

It should be put in context that when I state he has been ordinary since coming back that he is coming back from an ACL injury.

He is far from a complete player right now but if he gets his game together he will be some player.
 
Earl said:
His first half was terrible. He has been ordinary since coming back. His second half though showed how good he can be,

It should be put in context that when I state he has been ordinary since coming back that he is coming back from an ACL injury.

He is far from a complete player right now but if he gets his game together he will be some player.
Click to expand...
he is fantastic at running the ball AD'S passing and ball playing is not his strength though unfortunately
 
Jedi_Tiger said:
he is fantastic at running the ball AD'S passing and ball playing is not his strength though unfortunately
Click to expand...

I think it's more poor option taking. When he is under pressure though I think he falls back to running it. That is his strength.

Last week he contested a bomb and then put himself back into the line and then gave a short pass to Seyfarth. At other times he would have thrown the cut out pass straight to the winger. He took the right option then.

In the first half he kicked on the first tackle and did all sorts of terrible plays.
 
Batmans Parents said:
That’s adorable. You also conveniently leave out everything he did in the second half as it doesn’t align with your shit-for-brains stance. But that’s not surprising.

Basic understanding of the game? This coming from the fool who backs average pillows like Garner and claimed he was the best centre at the club? You wouldn’t understand the game even if it ran you over and kicked you in the balls.

Try swapping out the JD and cokes for water before watching games and maybe you’ll actually make it to a second half. Clown.
Click to expand...
He walked through from a set play. What else did he do you absolutely clueless dope. He got tackled about 3 times. That's it. If you think that's a good game you're a soccer fan. And who is a better centre than Garner you imbecile? Like I said, you have no clue about the game. Maybe you should start on the JD's and coke if that's your thing but you don't know anything about football so go join the Spice Girls forum where you might be able to convince someone you know what you're talking about.
 
tigerballs said:
He walked through from a set play. What else did he do you absolutely clueless dope. He got tackled about 3 times. That's it. If you think that's a good game you're a soccer fan. And who is a better centre than Garner you imbecile? Like I said, you have no clue about the game. Maybe you should start on the JD's and coke if that's your thing but you don't know anything about football so go join the Spice Girls forum where you might be able to convince someone you know what you're talking about.
Click to expand...

So you didn't watch the second half. Right, so sealing the game with a try, Tackled three times? He made over 100m, breaking the line and looked a threat anytime he pretty much touched the ball, played a massive part in our third try by tapping the ball back after a Madden bomb then spreading it for Seyfarth then Toa to score? Need more, you dumb prick?

Kepaoa is clearly a better centre than Garner and if you can't see that, then you're an even bigger spastic then you've let on already.

You clearly don't know your ass from your elbow when it comes to footy. Try watching it sober for once and you might learn a thing or two. Dickhead.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

Total: 613 (members: 39, guests: 574)
Forever online: Tigergran, Geo
Back
Top