Skando

@Geo. said:
@hybrid_tiger said:
@Eddie said:
His stint was good quality today. Got us some decent charges and quick play the balls.

Agreed Eddie. I have not been a fan of his inclusion, but yesterday (unlike his previous two games) he was quite good. His quick play the balls were very noticeable. Very happy to eat some humble pie on this one.

So when Sheens names him on Tuesday you will be OK with it?

If Gibbs is injured and it is purely as his replacement in the short term (next game or two), then it is fair enough.

Once Gibbs comes back I don't expect him to be named, I think the bench will be Fifita, Brown/Daniela, Dwyer, Gibbs.
 
@hybrid_tiger said:
If Gibbs is injured and it is purely as his replacement in the short term (next game or two), then it is fair enough.

Once Gibbs comes back I don't expect him to be named, I think the bench will be Fifita, Brown/Daniela, Dwyer, Gibbs.

Agreed….Skando is doing a job while Gibbs is out...

That will be the bench when Gibbs is back.
 
@smeghead said:
Personally no as my belief on better options being available still remains.

But if Sheens picks him my support will be there for him

I agree. Skando probably should not be there on merit.

In saying that he has been reasonably good. He is not anywhere near the level of Fifita or Moors but he hasn't really done anything wrong and he has made some good runs.
 
@tiger05 said:
I agree. Skando probably should not be there on merit.

In saying that he has been reasonably good. He is not anywhere near the level of Fifita or Moors but he hasn't really done anything wrong and he has made some good runs.

As a Prop Skando is better than Moors IMO….Moors has been playing like Bronson Harrison for the Pies as a wide running back rower and carving up...

Unless you think Sheens should use Moors like that of the bench then Yeah all over Skando...

Who else on merit should be there?

I can only think of Schirnack....
 
Back
Top