The Kennel

goldcoast_tiger

New member
I have just had a look at The Bulldogs forum"The Kennel. I thought that if the info here had any validity about some disasterous event at the Dogs, then there would probably be some mention there.
I only got as far as one page, as I realised why it is called "The Kennel" , however I think most dogs would be offended by the thought of sharing a home with some of these foul mouthed cretins that inhabit this particular "Kennel".
Some seem to not be able to write a sentence unless there is plenty of C's and F's
Through it.
Some were whingeing about the media hate that is directed at them, but if some of the comments were any indication of what they are like, then I can understand why they attract the name that they've got.
While there's plenty of passionate debate about subjects here, and we all differ in opinions at times, it doesn't get into the gutter Like those I read there tonight.
Even though the Mods are pretty hot here about swearing , most of us ( if not all)
Are capable of Making a point without the crap that is considered normal conversation on their forum.
I'm no prude, and I swear, but these Forums are in the public eye at times and it's not necessary.
Thanks to the Mods that help to make this a place different to the one I saw tonight, and to our members who seem to be able to get their option across without that
Sort of garbage.
 
I often use that forum as an example of what happens when moderation is nonexistent. There are some good club forums out there but there are some bad ones too.
 
@goldcoast tiger said:
I have just had a look at The Bulldogs forum"The Kennel. I thought that if the info here had any validity about some disasterous event at the Dogs, then there would probably be some mention there.
I only got as far as one page, as I realised why it is called "The Kennel" , however I think most dogs would be offended by the thought of sharing a home with some of these foul mouthed cretins that inhabit this particular "Kennel".
Some seem to not be able to write a sentence unless there is plenty of C's and F's
Through it.
Some were whingeing about the media hate that is directed at them, but if some of the comments were any indication of what they are like, then I can understand why they attract the name that they've got.
While there's plenty of passionate debate about subjects here, and we all differ in opinions at times, it doesn't get into the gutter Like those I read there tonight.
Even though the Mods are pretty hot here about swearing , most of us ( if not all)
Are capable of Making a point without the crap that is considered normal conversation on their forum.
I'm no prude, and I swear, but these Forums are in the public eye at times and it's not necessary.
Thanks to the Mods that help to make this a place different to the one I saw tonight, and to our members who seem to be able to get their option across without that
Sort of garbage.

Good post…I think we have one of the better Fan Forums in the game.....
 
@goldcoast tiger said:
Some were whingeing about the media hate that is directed at them

Doesn't sound any different to this forum. Everyone hates us apparently, the NRL, the media, the referee's etc. I was just reading the Parra forum on LU about the cap scandal and they were playing the same victim card that the NRL hates them, the telegraph hates them etc.

I reckon its safe to say supporters of every club feel like they're being victimized because they are so passionate that when something negative is said about them, or they cop some bad decision, it's a conspiracy. Always easier to blame someone else.
 
@Yossarian said:
**I often use that forum as an example of what happens when moderation is nonexistent.** There are some good club forums out there but there are some bad ones too.

Yep.
QFT….I wouldnt hang around there too long
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
Some were whingeing about the media hate that is directed at them

Doesn't sound any different to this forum. Everyone hates us apparently, the NRL, the media, the referee's etc. I was just reading the Parra forum on LU about the cap scandal and they were playing the same victim card that the NRL hates them, the telegraph hates them etc.

I reckon its safe to say supporters of every club feel like they're being victimized because they are so passionate that when something negative is said about them, or they cop some bad decision, it's a conspiracy. Always easier to blame someone else.

I wasn't talking about the whingeing, it was more about the general gutter posts, I'd hate to see any kids reading it. It's pretty disgusting, I
I can promise you it's different to here, probably it's not all of them, maybe I just picked a crook page, but that was enough for me.
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
Some were whingeing about the media hate that is directed at them

Doesn't sound any different to this forum. Everyone hates us apparently, the NRL, the media, the referee's etc. I was just reading the Parra forum on LU about the cap scandal and they were playing the same victim card that the NRL hates them, the telegraph hates them etc.

I reckon its safe to say supporters of every club feel like they're being victimized because they are so passionate that when something negative is said about them, or they cop some bad decision, it's a conspiracy. Always easier to blame someone else.

You very rarely here winning teams or their fan base having a dummy spit…..funny thatl
 
@goldcoast tiger said:
I have just had a look at The Bulldogs forum"The Kennel. I thought that if the info here had any validity about some disasterous event at the Dogs, then there would probably be some mention there.
I only got as far as one page, as I realised why it is called "The Kennel" , however I think most dogs would be offended by the thought of sharing a home with some of these foul mouthed cretins that inhabit this particular "Kennel".
Some seem to not be able to write a sentence unless there is plenty of C's and F's
Through it.
Some were whingeing about the media hate that is directed at them, but if some of the comments were any indication of what they are like, then I can understand why they attract the name that they've got.
While there's plenty of passionate debate about subjects here, and we all differ in opinions at times, it doesn't get into the gutter Like those I read there tonight.
Even though the Mods are pretty hot here about swearing , most of us ( if not all)
Are capable of Making a point without the crap that is considered normal conversation on their forum.
I'm no prude, and I swear, but these Forums are in the public eye at times and it's not necessary.
Thanks to the Mods that help to make this a place different to the one I saw tonight, and to our members who seem to be able to get their option across without that
Sort of garbage.

Agree GCT…BIG Thanks to our Mods, for keeping our forum civil and #*#€ free. :slight_smile:
 
It is pleasant not to be bombarded with bottom of the barrel human behaviour on this site…thanks to all mods. Weststigers forum the forum of the decent people !
 
I appreciate the quality of posts on here and agree it should be moderated. But sometimes feel it's "like life imitating art" much like the West Tigers itself, no mugral and The no d-heads policy. Which is very nice.
 
@Tigerdon said:
I appreciate the quality of posts on here and agree it should be moderated. But sometimes feel it's "like life imitating art" much like the West Tigers itself, no mugral and The no d-heads policy. Which is very nice.

I know its a little off topic, but this really irks me when i see it constantly repeated on here. Our club does not have, nor has it ever head a no d-heads policy. It's just something some people have sprouted on this forum for yrs, from i have no idea where.

The only organization that has ever openly had the policy is the Sydney Swans.
 
Il have you know that the Royal Gentlemens Club, ( aka The legends, ) would not tolerate such Lower Class behaviour , and we would remove them and give them a jolly good thrashing and tell them to never darken our doorstep again.
I must go, my gin and tonic is waiting.
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Tigerdon said:
I appreciate the quality of posts on here and agree it should be moderated. But sometimes feel it's "like life imitating art" much like the West Tigers itself, no mugral and The no d-heads policy. Which is very nice.

I know its a little off topic, but this really irks me when i see it constantly repeated on here. Our club does not have, nor has it ever head a no d-heads policy. It's just something some people have sprouted on this forum for yrs, from i have no idea where.

The only organization that has ever openly had the policy is the Sydney Swans.

All that crap talk came about when the club wussed out on signing Willie Mason .
Not to sure on the no Plodders policy :laughing:
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Tigerdon said:
I appreciate the quality of posts on here and agree it should be moderated. But sometimes feel it's "like life imitating art" much like the West Tigers itself, no mugral and The no d-heads policy. Which is very nice.

I know its a little off topic, but this really irks me when i see it constantly repeated on here. Our club does not have, nor has it ever head a no d-heads policy. It's just something some people have sprouted on this forum for yrs, from i have no idea where.

The only organization that has ever openly had the policy is the Sydney Swans.

Sydney Swans used to bleat on about it ad nauseum. But yet Adam Goodes and Buddy Franklin were in their team at the time. 2 d-heads right there.
 
Back
Top