Wests Tigers logo

No sorry that sucks....

I wish we'd do a 3D or angled version of ours like Manly rather than a flat 2D that's exactly the same.. Just opposite... Either side
 
I like it but it is more in keeping with something Balmain would have used back in the 90's.

These days with the almost exclusive use of stylised logos I don't think it would get a look in, certainly not in the NRL.
 
Benny_Olson said:
Hey guys we all no the logo we have now is bad. So I made this, what’s your thoughts?
Click to expand...
Do we?

I love nostalgia as much as the next person, but this belongs in 1991.

The current logo is great; it's sleek, repeatable, simplistic, recognisable and doesn't have those ridiculous, outdated claws that were about as trendy as chunky flames on a Harley.

The current trend in logos is far more modern and looks far better.
 
I wish the club would just stop with these stupid anniversary logos every 5 frigging years!
They went through all the hassle of re-designing our logo and merch, only to banish it behind some cluttered shield that's an absolute mess from a design pov. No simple logo, easily idenitifable. A whole heap of useless crap and a small tiger that doesn't stand out like it should.

I for one won't purchase any merch that has this hideous temporary logo on it, it ages so quickly and just looks awful.

And to the OP merging the Balmain and Wests logos will not suffice. We have a new logo, and it's decent. If it actually got used.
 
Kelce68 said:
Do we?

I love nostalgia as much as the next person, but this belongs in 1991.

The current logo is great; it's sleek, repeatable, simplistic, recognisable and doesn't have those ridiculous, outdated claws that were about as trendy as chunky flames on a Harley.

The current trend in logos is far more modern and looks far better.
Click to expand...
Do tigers have orange tongues, and white eyes?
 
balmain boy said:
I wish the club would just stop with these stupid anniversary logos every 5 frigging years!
They went through all the hassle of re-designing our logo and merch, only to banish it behind some cluttered shield that's an absolute mess from a design pov. No simple logo, easily idenitifable. A whole heap of useless crap and a small tiger that doesn't stand out like it should.

I for one won't purchase any merch that has this hideous temporary logo on it, it ages so quickly and just looks awful.

And to the OP merging the Balmain and Wests logos will not suffice. We have a new logo, and it's decent. If it actually got used.
Click to expand...

New logo means new merch. New merch means Pascoe gets to point at a spread sheet come October every year.
 
Benny_Olson said:
Do tigers have orange tongues, and white eyes?
Click to expand...
No.

But they don't have a red tongue or yellow eyes like yours either (Pink tongue and varying shades of amber eyes).

They don't have opposable thumbs like the old logo.

Panthers don't have aqua highlights.

Sharks aren't blue.

Vikings (Raiders) didn't have green beards.

Dolphins aren't white with red highlights.

Dragons don't exist.

Are you really upset with the fact that our current logo isn't anatomically accurate?
 
balmain boy said:
I wish the club would just stop with these stupid anniversary logos every 5 frigging years!
They went through all the hassle of re-designing our logo and merch, only to banish it behind some cluttered shield that's an absolute mess from a design pov. No simple logo, easily identifiable. A whole heap of useless crap and a small tiger that doesn't stand out like it should.

I for one won't purchase any merch that has this hideous temporary logo on it, it ages so quickly and just looks awful.

And to the OP merging the Balmain and Wests logos will not suffice. We have a new logo, and it's decent. If it actually got used.
Click to expand...
BB

Maybe we can get a logo that has the years we have missed finals

12th Anniversary jersey not celebrate the 25 years
 
Kelce68 said:
No.

But they don't have a red tongue or yellow eyes like yours either (Pink tongue and varying shades of amber eyes).

They don't have opposable thumbs like the old logo.

Panthers don't have aqua highlights.

Sharks aren't blue.

Vikings (Raiders) didn't have green beards.

Dolphins aren't white with red highlights.

Dragons don't exist.

Are you really upset with the fact that our current logo isn't anatomically accurate?
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

... and 9 more.
Total: 4,443 (members: 59, guests: 4,384)
Back
Top