Nofo No Try

Last week against the Roosters, the EXACT same thing happened with the EXACT same kick and in the EXACT same position when Ferguson missed the ball and the try was allowed. No deviation from the ball after Ferguson missed it, same thing when Naqama missed the ball, no deviation and it’s called a no try.

1:29 is when it happens.

clearly, we’re wearing the wrong jerseys

It was called a try vs Roosters that’s the difference.

translation = its a lottery

And I actually think Ferguson touched the ball last week. His right thumb pushes back as the ball goes through. Last week wasn’t even a try

yeah, the Referee call was a difference.

If he called Try, it would of been a try.

@Tiger Watto:

yeah, the Referee call was a difference.

If he called Try, it would of been a try.

Yep.

@stevetiger:

@Tiger Watto:

yeah, the Referee call was a difference.

If he called Try, it would of been a try.

Yep.

Crazy how that works when the Ref has NFI!

@Tiger Watto:

yeah, the Referee call was a difference.

If he called Try, it would of been a try.

Correct. Not enough evidence to turn it over either way so the original decision stands.

How the VR didn’t over all is beyond me… Was robbed

Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0

Dead set specs savers should be sponsoring the video ref not KFC. You could almost excuse the some of decisions as humour or a marketing ploy.

No where near the ball IMO.

The biggest factor in all this is that tonight the team was wearing a wests tigers jersey. End of story

No they weren’t. It was that marvel rubbish.

Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0

The no try ruling came via the touchy. He ruled touched, the ref took that advice, ruled no try, then they wouldn’t overturn it. Complete b.s. Whether there’s a bunker or not, someone still makes decisions on blurred freeze frames.

Recent Topics

Support our community by clicking here and joining our Forum Support Scheme