-
in the tele today it says ayshford is gone for 6 weeks
also says fitzhenry will come into the side with lote to fullback
i guess it will be
1. Lote
2. Fitzhenry
3. Ryan
4. Lawrence
5. Brown
that looks pretty weak -
bad luck for Blake. best of luck in recovery. am looking forward to seeing him back on the field.
would not be suprised to see Flannagan or Liam in the centres.
Beau fits in well at fullback.
will have to wait and see the team selected. -
If trueā¦ with that comboā¦ I think youād more than likely see
17. Fitzy
2. Lote
1. Ryan
4. Lawrence
5. Brown -
I worry about briging Fitzhenry in there just for the fact that he has had so little game time this season. We should look at someone else on the wing with Fitzhenry remaining as a backline replacement.
-
Why not:
-
Ryan
-
Lote
-
Brown or Daniella
-
Lawrence
-
Fitzy or Brown
-
Taumata
???
-
-
Fitzy will almost definately come into the start-on side. The least Sheens could do to compensate for such a terrible decision is to replace his bench spot with a performing forward.
-
1 - why would you try anyone else at 1 after Ryan has made >450 metres & been perfectly safe in his 2 games there.
2 - why would you put Fitzhenry anywhere near a starting jersey. Ever.But, if Sheensā is going to go the idiot route lets at least do something looking to the future.
1 Moltzen (heās not a good fullback at all but sheensā seems to think he is so heāll probably go back here)
2 Lote
3 Ryan (stupid to move him from 1 but anyway. Sheens may leave Ryan at 1 & put Moltz here at 3)
4 Lawrence
5 Brown (heās done nothing wrong at all in his couple of games)
6 Benji
7 Lazarus - Give the kid a go!Or just do the easy, logical, non-disruptive thing.
Flanagan as a direct swap for Ayshford and Moors, Dwyer (if heās fit) or someone similar on to the bench. -
1 - why would you try anyone else at 1 after Ryan has made >450 metres & been perfectly safe in his 2 games there.
If this happens Sheens is dead set kidding himself.
-
Or just do the easy, logical, non-disruptive thing.
Flanagan as a direct swap for Ayshford and Moors, Dwyer (if heās fit) or someone similar on to the bench.
agreed!!!fulton could also be used out there in the same role
-
Or just do the easy, logical, non-disruptive thing.
Flanagan as a direct swap for Ayshford and Moors, Dwyer (if heās fit) or someone similar on to the bench.Thatās what i think makes the most senseā¦
-
fulton could also be used out there in the same role
I remember floating this idea a few seasons backā¦ I think he doesnāt have speed anymore to play in the centers
-
If Ryan moves from fullback we should storm the concord oval office!!! WTF!!!
We have 1 injury. Why totally change the backline to cover 1 injury. Just stick the most suitable person we have left into the centre position. I dont care if its Daniela or some kid ive never heard of. Leave the rest and fill the spot.
1. Ryan
2. Lote
3. ???
4. Lawrence
5. Brown -
this is what was also said in tuesdayās telegraph.
-
1 - why would you try anyone else at 1 after Ryan has made >450 metres & been perfectly safe in his 2 games there.
If this happens Sheens is dead set kidding himself.
Well yeah, it makes no logical sense to move a guy who is averaging over 200 metres in attack from fullback and shifting him into the centres. Iād rather see Brown move to the centres and Fitzy to wing in the worst case scenario.
It makes so much more sense to move either Flanagan or Fulton to centre, leave Ryan at fullback, leave Brown on the wing and leave Fitzy on the bench. That causes the least amount of disruption to the side. Moors or Schirnack could be added to the bench and used as a wide running backrower in this scenario.
Anyone on here with half a brain can see itā¦ :brick:
-
Or just do the easy, logical, non-disruptive thing.
Flanagan as a direct swap for Ayshford and Moors, Dwyer (if heās fit) or someone similar on to the bench.
agreed!!!I think we all agree on this. Why disrupt a winning side more than necesary.
