Frizell cops one-week suspension
Mac_tiger last edited by
By Martin Gabor , National Correspondent , NRL.com
Tyson Frizell will miss his side’s game against the Brisbane Broncos after being found guilty at the judiciary on Tuesday night of his contrary conduct – contact with a match official charge.
The St George Illawarra Dragons back-rower was cited for making contact with referee Chris James in the fourth minute of last week’s 13-10 loss to the Bulldogs and will miss one week as a result of the guilty verdict.
Judiciary Counsel Peter McGrath used two angles to argue that Frizell’s conduct was contrary to the spirit of the game, and deemed the contact ‘avoidable’ and ‘unnecessary’ rather than ‘accidental’ or ‘incidental’.
Given the incident occurred early in the game, Mr McGrath argued that fatigue played no part in Frizell’s decision-making process and that he didn’t “exercise care” by attempting to walk where the referee was already standing.
Defence Counsel Nick Ghabar argued that Frizell was unsighted at the time given he was on the ground and not looking straight ahead towards the match official.
He also suggested the close proximity between Bulldogs centre Josh Morris, Frizell and referee James around the play the ball influenced the contact as neither party could avoid the contact.
Most importantly, he argued the referee initiated the contact with his right arm and that Frizell’s subsequent movement was nothing more than a reflex action.
However, the three-man panel of Chris McKenna, Mal Cochrane and Sean Garlick agreed with Mr McGrath’s case, deeming the contact careless enough to warrant a one-game ban.
The NSW Blues star was naturally upset with the verdict but conceded the new interpretations of the rule meant he was always at risk of being rubbed out.
“I’m pretty disappointed about the outcome of what happened,” Frizell said.
“I guess they see it as black and white, and any contact with the referee will give you a week on the sideline.”
McGrath, McKenna, Cochrane and Garlick should hang their heads in shame after this. What’s the game coming to? I’m all for protecting referees, but how were Frizell’s actions “contrary to the spirit of the game”? Why don’t they have a look at defending players who get into the face of the ref while he is trying to sum up whether he should award a try or refer to the bunker - that’s intimidation. And don’t get me started on Reynolds escaping suspension for yet another trip.
bp_tiger last edited by
the NRL have gone mad, how could u give him one week for that, and that grub renyolds trips a player and is free to play. the NRL are going to drive supporters away from the game the way they are going.
Tiger_Tim last edited by
This is one of the worst calls i have ever seen. It makes me embarrassed to follow this sport. It is clear the lunatics have taken over the asylum.
innsaneink last edited by
The games a bloody joke now.
Its why I dont bother putting money into it anymore, its a farce
Knuckles last edited by
Surely a warning is sufficient … One week for that … ???
gallagher last edited by
I dunno. They made it clear earlier in the year that any hands on the ref will cop a week. I can live with it.
But just about every other matter that goes to the MRC or judiciary is way off. Multiple tripping and reynolds cops nothing? It used to be an automatic send off.
Tigertigertiger Banned last edited by
League is going backwards even more
Chevy last edited by
Rediculous decision,the clowns that came up with this verdict really should go to spec savers,where was the guy meant to go ? if anything the ref put himself in a poor position,but then again they never do anything wrong.Saints fans have every right to blow up…!