Paseka...



  • This is the kind of highlight reel you want to see from your props. Making plenty of breaks up the guts, good offload (imagine Teddy running off him!) & hitting hard in D. Hope he brings this form to 1sts when he gets his chance:

    NRL.com predict most exciting rookies http://yi.nzc.am/dnJ3e3



  • He looks like a guy who can really intimidate defenders and make big metres.

    Looks like he can tackle hard as well.

    Definetly deserves a spot in first grade.



  • He has a lot of potential give him a few years and he could be as useful as woods is now.Hopefully he will be eased into the big time.



  • He looks good, notice Liddel in support on of few of those highlights!



  • Could he make the the transition into the second row? Looks to have a bit speed and a nice offload.



  • Paseka is a big unit and has a good motor for someone so big. Looks to run hard and has an offload in him.
    I’m excited to see him get a run of the bench wh Ava and JJ.



  • Could be a good fantasy choice ??



  • I wouldn’t rush him as he’s still only 19 but I wouldn’t be surprised if he were to debut at some point. He certainly improved rapidly last year and if that development continues to come on quickly then he may get his chance later in the year.



  • @willow:

    I wouldn’t rush him as he’s still only 19 but I wouldn’t be surprised if he were to debut at some point. He certainly improved rapidly last year and if that development continues to come on quickly then he may get his chance later in the year.

    Yeah agreed , you would only give him limited game time over a few games unless injuries call

    I don’t see him as a Woods who could comfortably handle the rigours of FG from the get go



  • @happy tiger:

    Could be a good fantasy choice ??

    If you’re into that sort of thing…
    Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

    Might be a bit personal to be sharing on a Forum though.



  • @Sabre:

    @happy tiger:

    Could be a good fantasy choice ??

    If you’re into that sort of thing…
    Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

    Might be a bit personal to be sharing on a Forum though.

    It’s crossed your mind , don’t be shy Sabre



  • @happy tiger:

    @willow:

    I wouldn’t rush him as he’s still only 19 but I wouldn’t be surprised if he were to debut at some point. He certainly improved rapidly last year and if that development continues to come on quickly then he may get his chance later in the year.

    Yeah agreed , you would only give him limited game time over a few games unless injuries call

    I don’t see him as a Woods who could comfortably handle the rigours of FG from the get go

    I know forwards are late bloomers but, what happened to “if there good enough there old enough”. Not arguing for and against just asking?



  • @Tiger Come Lately:

    @happy tiger:

    @willow:

    I wouldn’t rush him as he’s still only 19 but I wouldn’t be surprised if he were to debut at some point. He certainly improved rapidly last year and if that development continues to come on quickly then he may get his chance later in the year.

    Yeah agreed , you would only give him limited game time over a few games unless injuries call

    I don’t see him as a Woods who could comfortably handle the rigours of FG from the get go

    I know forwards are late bloomers but, what happened to “if there good enough there old enough”. Not arguing for and against just asking?

    He missed a lot of tackles in the NYC last year. Not good enough for first grade yet, at least not decent minutes in first grade.



  • @Nelson:

    @Tiger Come Lately:

    @happy tiger:

    @willow:

    I wouldn’t rush him as he’s still only 19 but I wouldn’t be surprised if he were to debut at some point. He certainly improved rapidly last year and if that development continues to come on quickly then he may get his chance later in the year.

    Yeah agreed , you would only give him limited game time over a few games unless injuries call

    I don’t see him as a Woods who could comfortably handle the rigours of FG from the get go

    I know forwards are late bloomers but, what happened to “if there good enough there old enough”. Not arguing for and against just asking?

    He missed a lot of tackles in the NYC last year. Not good enough for first grade yet, at least not decent minutes in first grade.

    You’d like to see how he handles at least 2 months of NSW Cup before we throw him to the wolves

    But if he kills it in the trials you never know

    The problem is if we picked him and we get a few injuries and we need him to play big minutes it could do more harm than good

    I think we pushed Groat and BMM in before they were ready and the results weren’t good



  • @happy tiger:

    @Nelson:

    @Tiger Come Lately:

    @happy tiger:

    Yeah agreed , you would only give him limited game time over a few games unless injuries call

    I don’t see him as a Woods who could comfortably handle the rigours of FG from the get go

    I know forwards are late bloomers but, what happened to “if there good enough there old enough”. Not arguing for and against just asking?

    He missed a lot of tackles in the NYC last year. Not good enough for first grade yet, at least not decent minutes in first grade.

    You’d like to see how he handles at least 2 months of NSW Cup before we throw him to the wolves

    But if he kills it in the trials you never know

    The problem is if we picked him and we get a few injuries and we need him to play big minutes it could do more harm than good

    I think we pushed Groat and BMM in before they were ready and the results weren’t good

    Fair call. I was never sold on Groat, he was a big boy but i just didn’t see it in him. BMM on the other hand i thought was going to be a big part of our pack.


Log in to reply
 

Recent Topics