NRL taking on players' managers


  • Banned

    https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/agents-of-change-nrl-stoush-with-player-managers-turning-ugly-20181015-p509pt.html

    A bitter battle looms — as brutal as any during the Super League war — between the NRL administration and player managers over Rugby League Central’s plans to reform the agent accreditation system.

    The code’s 110 accredited player managers have formed a union and have threatened legal action to resist the administration’s attempts to make them accountable to the same NRL rules by which players and officials must abide.


    Making change: NRL COO Nick Weeks and CEO Todd Greenberg.CREDIT:BEN RUSHTON

    The agents insist on retaining the current system of self-regulation.

    A meeting at RL Central on Monday, attended by only a handful of agents, ended with NRL chief operating officer Nick Weeks reiterating that the commitment to reform across the game was widespread and insisting the strength of resolve at NRL headquarters was very strong.

    A similar meeting will be held in Brisbane on Tuesday.

    “There’s a smash-up coming,” one official said. “It’s driven by the contest between our desire to fix a system of agent accreditation that is clearly broken, and the will of agents to retain a system of self-regulation under which they remain unaccountable.”

    Negotiations between Weeks and the agents over reform began early this year but resulted in the agents combining to form their own union to fight it. They withdrew from negotiations last month and the majority have refused to engage on the substance of the reform since. Instead, they have engaged lawyers and threatened to seek an injunction to stop any attempts to submit them to jurisdiction under NRL rules. NRL clubs and the RLPA support the administration’s insistence on replacing the current system where the NRL has only one vote on the seven-man committee regulating the action of agents.

    The one constant question throughout 2018, during meetings between NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg, Weeks and the NRL’s 16 clubs, has been: “When are you going to fix the agent accreditation scheme?” Under the proposed reform, the NRL and RLPA would take joint control of the accreditation and discipline process, dismantling the current committee where agents have three representatives.

    No agent has been accountable for the salary cap breaches at Parramatta and Manly. Seven club officials were thrown out of the game and $1.75m in fines were imposed on the two clubs, but no player agent has been disciplined for his involvement in facilitating the deals that breached the cap.

    The inability of the game to investigate or sanction agents for their conduct in these large-scale salary cap matters undermines the credibility of the sport. It also tars all agents with the same brush as their unscrupulous colleagues. Agents extract about $10m a year from the code’s economy, a sum equivalent to the salary cap of one NRL club.

    Over the past 15 years, player salaries have compounded at a rate of 10 per cent per year while player managers have put their hands out for 7 per cent commission.

    While some have a genuine desire to enhance the professional and emotional advancement of players, many have a client list so long they cannot possibly service them all.

    Of the NRL’s 110 accredited agents, less than 20 have viable businesses.

    Of the 5000 players they represent, only about 500 are professional rugby league players. The balance is made up primarily of under-age players. While the legal action to injunct the NRL’s reform plan is being funded by the biggest earning agents, the fight is being led by the old-school managers who have benefited from self-regulation the past 15 years.

    Many of the younger agents support a new scheme. They want reform and an opportunity to compete on a level playing field. Obviously, the NRL administration will hope some of these agents splinter away from those who oppose the scheme.

    The NRL insists the reform process is not about reducing the fees that agents can charge but rather ensuring they provide a professional service.

    A significant problem with the current system is that it allows agents to sign fixed term agency contracts that provide no opportunity for player to get out of the deal. This is unprecedented in Australian and global sport. There are cases where players have signed 10-year contracts (effectively a lifetime deal for a player) with no opportunity to break that deal if the player wants to leave because he is unhappy with the service. The reform model would continue to allow long-term deals but would grant a player or agent a reasonable opportunity to extract himself from the relationship.
    In June last year, the current seven-person accreditation committee introduced a rule which allowed a player to terminate the contractual relationship with an agent who is sanctioned for a breach of its rules. However, any management agreement signed before June 2017 was quarantined from this rule.

    Furthermore, with no agents sanctioned in the past two and a half years, the rule has proved meaningless.

    Roy Masters is a Sports Columnist for The Sydney Morning Herald.



  • If we can get scum like Issac Moses out of league I am all for the NRL pushing ahead with their reform. Be interesting if the NRL get their way, if a few teams start to struggle all of a sudden with their recruitment



  • I will believe in the Easter Bunny Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy before the NRL clean up any of the mess they have allowed to fester over the years.There are more shady deals and brown paper bags than there ever has been.
    Yes i am very cynical



  • Key to this is getting the players on board. Do that and the mangers don’t have a leg to stand on.



  • Simplest answer is to subsidise commissions for accredited managers for 3 years. Instead of the manager getting 3% from the player(for example), they get 1.5 from the player and 1.5 from tv funding or from the club via a cap exemption.

    I know some people don’t like market interference, but when you are dealing with a corrupt system you need to ditch the facade of “due process”. It’s become like game management, a buzzword to excuse the fact that you are ineffective and not good enough.

    Get results or resign.


  • ForumSupporter

    Good luck with that Todd…



  • @:

    If we can get scum like Issac Moses out of league I am all for the NRL pushing ahead with their reform. Be interesting if the NRL get their way, if a few teams start to struggle all of a sudden with their recruitment

    No surprise it’s him and the few like him (that tar all the others) that are opposing this



  • bout time. blight on the game



  • How can the agents possibly have a legal argument to fight increased oversight from the governing body under which they generate revenue?

    It’s like saying you want to stage an event at the football stadium, make money off it, but not be subject to the rules and regulations of the stadium authority.

    I do appreciate that Roy Masters has taken this on as somewhat of a personal crusade to report, as most journos aren’t really keeping abreast of the potential changes to the agent model.

    And if the end result is leveling of the agent playing field and toppling a few of the top agents? I reckon 95% of fans are in favour of that.



  • Good luck to the nrl… im with you on the reform.



  • Bit like getting rid of the mafia……it ain’t going to happen.



  • If the NRL are serious about any reform the first step has to be to get rid of Greenberg and then subsequently get the players union on board.

    The NRL rules should apply to all associated with the code.



  • @:

    If the NRL are serious about any reform the first step has to be to get rid of Greenberg and then subsequently get the players union on board.

    The NRL rules should apply to all associated with the code.

    I thought the RLPA was already on board?



  • Fixed fee commission for securing contracts. Only way that players and agents will stop drawing out negotiations and holding clubs to ransom. When the player’s agent doesn’t rely on an increase in the contract to determine his commission he’ll be more likely to scope out all suitors and press his client to make a decision and waste less time on pushing clubs.



  • Why not have the player managers under the employ of the NRL ??

    Makes sense and they can watch every move they make


Log in to reply
 

Recent Topics