I am sure we can all agree that the Judiciary this year has been fairly shocking. One week they are suspending players, with the right calls, next week they suspending players for perfectly timed hits. Next year, they had better pull their heads in.

The people have spoken re the performance of the judiciary.

The match review committee is worse

i would love to know, if the same people are on the Judiciary Panel each time, or if they get “specific” people for each type of incident…

Picked terrible but I would have selected inconsistent if that was an option.

Recent Topics

Support our community by clicking here and joining our Forum Support Scheme