Which was better ?



  • Brooks had a great game. Did nothing wrong. He wasnt the one dropping balls and missing tackles.

    Every time he had the ball he looked dangerous.



  • @southerntiger said in Which was better ?:

    Brooks had a great game. Did nothing wrong. He wasnt the one dropping balls and missing tackles.

    Every time he had the ball he looked dangerous.

    He played well!



  • @momo_amp_medo said in Which was better ?:

    @southerntiger said in Which was better ?:

    Brooks had a great game. Did nothing wrong. He wasnt the one dropping balls and missing tackles.

    Every time he had the ball he looked dangerous.

    He played well!

    x3. Not really sure what the purpose of this thread bump is.



  • @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @avocadoontoast said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    Today, 2nd good game ive ever seen him play. About time. See if he can back it up next week or go missing as usual.

    Solid effort to win the Dally M halfback of the year when you’ve only ever played 2 good games in your career and none of those games were in that year.

    Just goes to show how flawed those awards are. Cant even lead his team into a finals series and gets an award that his fan boys will feed off to justify his entire failed career? 🤦‍♂️

    Christ, how miserable are you.

    Id imagine it would be pretty miserable to never see the truth, hows that working out for you?

    Mate, its great. We’re playing on Sunday in front of a full house at home to get into the 8. We’re all pumped. Then there’s you, having a sulk because Brooks is getting credit for playing well.

    nah im pointing out Brooks has been rubbish for 5 years and its about time he pulled his finger out.

    Clearly you haven’t been watching us play lately.

    Isnt that the exact point of what i said? About time he pulled his finger out = “lately”

    Okay, so you acknowledge he’s pulled his finger out lately. So, why are you moaning?

    If you call “moaning” pointing out that Brooks usually plays like garbage and The Tigers havent had a decent half back since Lui, then sure, call it moaning. Id prefer to call it “reality”. Each to the their own.

    And another thing, you are clearly bitter about it. You don’t want the guy playing well. You want him to fail.

    Citation needed?

    On the contrary, im actually wanting a half back that can lead the Tigers into the finals, thus far it hasnt been Brooks. Why are you pleased for the failing of the past to justify a decent game here and there?

    Yes, wanting A halfback. You don’t want it to be Brooks. Even if he is the one to lead us.

    I couldnt careless who it is, as long as they steer a team into the finals, as of yet, Brooks has proven himself incapable.

    So if we win on Sunday, then what? Are you going to be a man and give him credit for being that halfback, or will you take the easy way out and give it to him for taking so long to do it?

    He played amazing…

    Bit sad you had to dig this up to run an agenda.

    Brooks was far, far, from the problem. Get real.



  • @Moh said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @avocadoontoast said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    Today, 2nd good game ive ever seen him play. About time. See if he can back it up next week or go missing as usual.

    Solid effort to win the Dally M halfback of the year when you’ve only ever played 2 good games in your career and none of those games were in that year.

    Just goes to show how flawed those awards are. Cant even lead his team into a finals series and gets an award that his fan boys will feed off to justify his entire failed career? 🤦‍♂️

    Christ, how miserable are you.

    Id imagine it would be pretty miserable to never see the truth, hows that working out for you?

    Mate, its great. We’re playing on Sunday in front of a full house at home to get into the 8. We’re all pumped. Then there’s you, having a sulk because Brooks is getting credit for playing well.

    nah im pointing out Brooks has been rubbish for 5 years and its about time he pulled his finger out.

    Clearly you haven’t been watching us play lately.

    Isnt that the exact point of what i said? About time he pulled his finger out = “lately”

    Okay, so you acknowledge he’s pulled his finger out lately. So, why are you moaning?

    If you call “moaning” pointing out that Brooks usually plays like garbage and The Tigers havent had a decent half back since Lui, then sure, call it moaning. Id prefer to call it “reality”. Each to the their own.

    And another thing, you are clearly bitter about it. You don’t want the guy playing well. You want him to fail.

    Citation needed?

    On the contrary, im actually wanting a half back that can lead the Tigers into the finals, thus far it hasnt been Brooks. Why are you pleased for the failing of the past to justify a decent game here and there?

    Yes, wanting A halfback. You don’t want it to be Brooks. Even if he is the one to lead us.

    I couldnt careless who it is, as long as they steer a team into the finals, as of yet, Brooks has proven himself incapable.

    So if we win on Sunday, then what? Are you going to be a man and give him credit for being that halfback, or will you take the easy way out and give it to him for taking so long to do it?

    He played amazing…

    Bit sad you had to dig this up to run an agenda.

    Brooks was far, far, from the problem. Get real.

    Bit sad you cant run your usual Brooks has potential agenda.

    Brooks was part of the problem. Get real.



  • @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @Moh said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @avocadoontoast said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    Today, 2nd good game ive ever seen him play. About time. See if he can back it up next week or go missing as usual.

    Solid effort to win the Dally M halfback of the year when you’ve only ever played 2 good games in your career and none of those games were in that year.

    Just goes to show how flawed those awards are. Cant even lead his team into a finals series and gets an award that his fan boys will feed off to justify his entire failed career? 🤦‍♂️

    Christ, how miserable are you.

    Id imagine it would be pretty miserable to never see the truth, hows that working out for you?

    Mate, its great. We’re playing on Sunday in front of a full house at home to get into the 8. We’re all pumped. Then there’s you, having a sulk because Brooks is getting credit for playing well.

    nah im pointing out Brooks has been rubbish for 5 years and its about time he pulled his finger out.

    Clearly you haven’t been watching us play lately.

    Isnt that the exact point of what i said? About time he pulled his finger out = “lately”

    Okay, so you acknowledge he’s pulled his finger out lately. So, why are you moaning?

    If you call “moaning” pointing out that Brooks usually plays like garbage and The Tigers havent had a decent half back since Lui, then sure, call it moaning. Id prefer to call it “reality”. Each to the their own.

    And another thing, you are clearly bitter about it. You don’t want the guy playing well. You want him to fail.

    Citation needed?

    On the contrary, im actually wanting a half back that can lead the Tigers into the finals, thus far it hasnt been Brooks. Why are you pleased for the failing of the past to justify a decent game here and there?

    Yes, wanting A halfback. You don’t want it to be Brooks. Even if he is the one to lead us.

    I couldnt careless who it is, as long as they steer a team into the finals, as of yet, Brooks has proven himself incapable.

    So if we win on Sunday, then what? Are you going to be a man and give him credit for being that halfback, or will you take the easy way out and give it to him for taking so long to do it?

    He played amazing…

    Bit sad you had to dig this up to run an agenda.

    Brooks was far, far, from the problem. Get real.

    Bit sad you cant run your usual Brooks has potential agenda.

    Brooks was part of the problem. Get real.

    No… Not really.
    Forwards were dominated and we lost the ruck pretty early… everything else follows



  • @innsaneink said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @Moh said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @avocadoontoast said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    Today, 2nd good game ive ever seen him play. About time. See if he can back it up next week or go missing as usual.

    Solid effort to win the Dally M halfback of the year when you’ve only ever played 2 good games in your career and none of those games were in that year.

    Just goes to show how flawed those awards are. Cant even lead his team into a finals series and gets an award that his fan boys will feed off to justify his entire failed career? 🤦‍♂️

    Christ, how miserable are you.

    Id imagine it would be pretty miserable to never see the truth, hows that working out for you?

    Mate, its great. We’re playing on Sunday in front of a full house at home to get into the 8. We’re all pumped. Then there’s you, having a sulk because Brooks is getting credit for playing well.

    nah im pointing out Brooks has been rubbish for 5 years and its about time he pulled his finger out.

    Clearly you haven’t been watching us play lately.

    Isnt that the exact point of what i said? About time he pulled his finger out = “lately”

    Okay, so you acknowledge he’s pulled his finger out lately. So, why are you moaning?

    If you call “moaning” pointing out that Brooks usually plays like garbage and The Tigers havent had a decent half back since Lui, then sure, call it moaning. Id prefer to call it “reality”. Each to the their own.

    And another thing, you are clearly bitter about it. You don’t want the guy playing well. You want him to fail.

    Citation needed?

    On the contrary, im actually wanting a half back that can lead the Tigers into the finals, thus far it hasnt been Brooks. Why are you pleased for the failing of the past to justify a decent game here and there?

    Yes, wanting A halfback. You don’t want it to be Brooks. Even if he is the one to lead us.

    I couldnt careless who it is, as long as they steer a team into the finals, as of yet, Brooks has proven himself incapable.

    So if we win on Sunday, then what? Are you going to be a man and give him credit for being that halfback, or will you take the easy way out and give it to him for taking so long to do it?

    He played amazing…

    Bit sad you had to dig this up to run an agenda.

    Brooks was far, far, from the problem. Get real.

    Bit sad you cant run your usual Brooks has potential agenda.

    Brooks was part of the problem. Get real.

    No… Not really.
    Forwards were dominated and we lost the ruck pretty early… everything else follows

    Yep, its not his responsibility to put on an attacking play, a sharp pass an accurate kick etc, nope, the forwards need to win the ruck.



  • You got it 👍



  • @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @innsaneink said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @Moh said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @avocadoontoast said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    Today, 2nd good game ive ever seen him play. About time. See if he can back it up next week or go missing as usual.

    Solid effort to win the Dally M halfback of the year when you’ve only ever played 2 good games in your career and none of those games were in that year.

    Just goes to show how flawed those awards are. Cant even lead his team into a finals series and gets an award that his fan boys will feed off to justify his entire failed career? 🤦‍♂️

    Christ, how miserable are you.

    Id imagine it would be pretty miserable to never see the truth, hows that working out for you?

    Mate, its great. We’re playing on Sunday in front of a full house at home to get into the 8. We’re all pumped. Then there’s you, having a sulk because Brooks is getting credit for playing well.

    nah im pointing out Brooks has been rubbish for 5 years and its about time he pulled his finger out.

    Clearly you haven’t been watching us play lately.

    Isnt that the exact point of what i said? About time he pulled his finger out = “lately”

    Okay, so you acknowledge he’s pulled his finger out lately. So, why are you moaning?

    If you call “moaning” pointing out that Brooks usually plays like garbage and The Tigers havent had a decent half back since Lui, then sure, call it moaning. Id prefer to call it “reality”. Each to the their own.

    And another thing, you are clearly bitter about it. You don’t want the guy playing well. You want him to fail.

    Citation needed?

    On the contrary, im actually wanting a half back that can lead the Tigers into the finals, thus far it hasnt been Brooks. Why are you pleased for the failing of the past to justify a decent game here and there?

    Yes, wanting A halfback. You don’t want it to be Brooks. Even if he is the one to lead us.

    I couldnt careless who it is, as long as they steer a team into the finals, as of yet, Brooks has proven himself incapable.

    So if we win on Sunday, then what? Are you going to be a man and give him credit for being that halfback, or will you take the easy way out and give it to him for taking so long to do it?

    He played amazing…

    Bit sad you had to dig this up to run an agenda.

    Brooks was far, far, from the problem. Get real.

    Bit sad you cant run your usual Brooks has potential agenda.

    Brooks was part of the problem. Get real.

    No… Not really.
    Forwards were dominated and we lost the ruck pretty early… everything else follows

    Yep, its not his responsibility to put on an attacking play, a sharp pass an accurate kick etc, nope, the forwards need to win the ruck.

    I was at the game today …
    Brooks went ok but I’d have liked to see a chip n chase or something in the last 15 mins …



  • @hobbo1 said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @innsaneink said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @Moh said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @GNR4LIFE said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    @avocadoontoast said in Which was better ?:

    @fair-dinkum said in Which was better ?:

    Today, 2nd good game ive ever seen him play. About time. See if he can back it up next week or go missing as usual.

    Solid effort to win the Dally M halfback of the year when you’ve only ever played 2 good games in your career and none of those games were in that year.

    Just goes to show how flawed those awards are. Cant even lead his team into a finals series and gets an award that his fan boys will feed off to justify his entire failed career? 🤦‍♂️

    Christ, how miserable are you.

    Id imagine it would be pretty miserable to never see the truth, hows that working out for you?

    Mate, its great. We’re playing on Sunday in front of a full house at home to get into the 8. We’re all pumped. Then there’s you, having a sulk because Brooks is getting credit for playing well.

    nah im pointing out Brooks has been rubbish for 5 years and its about time he pulled his finger out.

    Clearly you haven’t been watching us play lately.

    Isnt that the exact point of what i said? About time he pulled his finger out = “lately”

    Okay, so you acknowledge he’s pulled his finger out lately. So, why are you moaning?

    If you call “moaning” pointing out that Brooks usually plays like garbage and The Tigers havent had a decent half back since Lui, then sure, call it moaning. Id prefer to call it “reality”. Each to the their own.

    And another thing, you are clearly bitter about it. You don’t want the guy playing well. You want him to fail.

    Citation needed?

    On the contrary, im actually wanting a half back that can lead the Tigers into the finals, thus far it hasnt been Brooks. Why are you pleased for the failing of the past to justify a decent game here and there?

    Yes, wanting A halfback. You don’t want it to be Brooks. Even if he is the one to lead us.

    I couldnt careless who it is, as long as they steer a team into the finals, as of yet, Brooks has proven himself incapable.

    So if we win on Sunday, then what? Are you going to be a man and give him credit for being that halfback, or will you take the easy way out and give it to him for taking so long to do it?

    He played amazing…

    Bit sad you had to dig this up to run an agenda.

    Brooks was far, far, from the problem. Get real.

    Bit sad you cant run your usual Brooks has potential agenda.

    Brooks was part of the problem. Get real.

    No… Not really.
    Forwards were dominated and we lost the ruck pretty early… everything else follows

    Yep, its not his responsibility to put on an attacking play, a sharp pass an accurate kick etc, nope, the forwards need to win the ruck.

    I was at the game today …
    Brooks went ok but I’d have liked to see a chip n chase or something in the last 15 mins …

    Nope, he couldnt do it cause the forwards didnt win the ruck. He pretty much had a free pass to do nothing cause the forwards didnt win the ruck so i wouldnt expect him to do anything really in the last 70 minutes of the game because you know, the forwards didnt win the ruck.


Log in to reply
 

Recent Topics