Captains Challenge to be trialled

Captain’s challenge set for trial after provisional ARLC approval
Author
Dan Walsh
NRL.com Reporter
Timestamp
Thu 6 Feb 2020, 06:02 PM
Dan Walsh
Share on social media
Share via Facebook
Share via Twiiter
Share via Reddit
Share via Email
The NRL’s proposed “captain’s challenge” will be trialled in marquee All Stars and Charity Shield pre-season fixtures after being provisionally approved by the ARL Commission.

Under the submitted rule change, teams will have the chance to lodge an official challenge with the NRL video bunker for a disputed ruling.

The proposed concept is intended to take pressure off referees and potentially remove obvious errors from the game.

A recommended time frame for challenges to be made is yet to be confirmed, but it is believed a period of 10 or 15 seconds will be trialled.

After being presented to ARL chairman Peter V’landys and his board on Thursday, the captain’s challenge will be discussed with clubs, the RLPA and broadcasters before a decision is made at the Commission’s next board meeting on February 28 on whether it is introduced for the 2020 NRL season.

Stakeholders will get their first look at the captain’s challenge in its proposed format during the All Stars game on February 22, while it will also be used the following week’s Rabbitohs-Dragons Charity Shield fixture in Mudgee.

NRL head of football Graham Annesley.
NRL head of football Graham Annesley.
©Nathan Hopkins/NRL Photos
Under the proposed system, each captain will have the opportunity to call for the bunker’s intervention on a ruling once play has stopped, with one incorrect challenge permitted per game.

If the on-field decision is upheld, no further referrals can be made.

But if a ruling is overturned, that team retains their challenge.

Challenges can only be made when the game has come to a halt, such as at a scrum, penalty, handover of possession 20m restart or goal line drop out.

Decisions cannot be challenged while the ball is in play.

If an incident occurs but the on-field referee rules play-on, such as when a defending team gains possession through a knock-on, that ruling stands.

The concept’s proposal is designed to prevent clear-cut errors influencing a game, in turn easing scrutiny on the code’s whistleblowers.

When it was first put forward late last year, NRL head of football Graham Annesley conceded a tactical facet could arise from the challenge rule.

Annesley presented to the Commission on how the captain’s challenge system could work on Thursday, having been tasked with exploring the concept by the ARLC in December.

“Fans have walked away in the past feeling as though there were errors that affected their team,” Annesley said at the time.

"The Commission is very keen on it from that point of view as an innovation in our game. It’s intended to try and capture those obvious errors.

"If a team decided to use it with a discretionary call by a referee where things are unlikely to have a resolution one way or another or they risk making a wrong challenge they obviously lose it.

“It’s a tactical operation that coaches and players will have to decide how and when to use it. I think it’s going to have little difference to stoppages or the elapsed time in games.”

The ARLC’s directive was guided in part by fan feedback through NRL.com’s State of the Game survey last October, which canvassed more than 18,000 respondents.

A great initiative. It’ll shift the focus a little from the referees making a poor call, to the captain not making the right call to challenge. Hopefully this takes the pressure off the refs and allows them to call the game as they see it, rather than being scared to make a big decision. I’d prefer to see one challenge each half. But I guess we need to consider the time it will take for each review to occur.

Cammy is gonna love it

It’s only taken them like 10 years.

I don’t feel like it takes attention off the refs, if anything it pressures them to not make any mistakes otherwise they’ll have players in their face yelling at them even more than before. Plus it’ll slow the game down a lot and there’s enough of that already. We’ll see how it goes in the all stars game

I’m guessing forward passes still won’t be able to be ruled on

This is a rubbish introduction!

The new scrum rule …love it … we seemed to stick to the 10 metre line …that was Benji’s call the 2 I noticed

@happy_tiger said in Captains Challenge to be trialled:

The new scrum rule …love it … we seemed to stick to the 10 metre line …that was Benji’s call the 2 I noticed

yup love it more action

the 20 40 rule is very intresting…very highrisk…i dont think we will see to much durng the regular season

@TheDaBoss said in Captains Challenge to be trialled:

@happy_tiger said in Captains Challenge to be trialled:

The new scrum rule …love it … we seemed to stick to the 10 metre line …that was Benji’s call the 2 I noticed

yup love it more action

the 20 40 rule is very intresting…very highrisk…i dont think we will see to much durng the regular season

Big risk big reward

Can see teams using it when they are down by 4 with little time left

I think it should only be used for try scoring situations.

It would mean more cases of refs making on the spot decisions rather than going to the Video Ref.
Rather than going to the video the ref could just call No Try but if the player was sure he scored he could ask for the review.

last edited by Sabre

@Sabre said in Captains Challenge to be trialled:

I think it should only be used for try scoring situations.

It would mean more cases of refs making on the spot decisions rather than going to the Video Ref.
Rather than going to the video the ref could just call No Try but if the player was sure he scored he could ask for the review.

I loved it Sabre …how many games turn on a single call …and if you are correct you can use it again and again …only issue is refs are probably going to let 50/50 things slide because of the captains calls

The way those 2 Gooses refereed today, we need about 50 Captain’s call per half.

@happy_tiger said in Captains Challenge to be trialled:

@Sabre said in Captains Challenge to be trialled:

I think it should only be used for try scoring situations.

It would mean more cases of refs making on the spot decisions rather than going to the Video Ref.
Rather than going to the video the ref could just call No Try but if the player was sure he scored he could ask for the review.

I loved it Sabre …how many games turn on a single call …and if you are correct you can use it again and again …only issue is refs are probably going to let 50/50 things slide because of the captains calls

I don’t think every incorrect call needs to be overturned. Refs making mistakes is a reality of the game. The more we implement things like the Captain’s Challenge the more we expect them to be perfect.

Recent Topics

Support our community by clicking here and joining our Forum Support Scheme