Foxsports stats - Tigers V Chooks

Is that a record low metres gained for a starting prop?

Packer: 3 runs for 16m

Says it all really.

Our forwards don’t do enough work. To win games you need multiple guys hitting over 100m in the forwards. One out running from the backs isn’t going to win us shit.

Packer: 3 runs for 16m

Says it all really.

Our forwards don’t do enough work. To win games you need multiple guys hitting over 100m in the forwards. One out running from the backs isn’t going to win us shit.

Nah but he does good stuff ya don’t see

Did Packer get hurt? Why didn’t he come back on?

Packer got hooked he didn’t come back on second half.

Thank God for AD shining light

Bloody hell , i got shot down because i bagged him for 78 m .
16m??? Anybody still want him as captain?

@weststigerman said in Foxsports stats - Tigers V Chooks:

Is that a record low metres gained for a starting prop?

Sadly, Matulino and Packer must be our worst props pair ever!

Id rather play Musgrove injured.

@InBenjiWeTrust said in Foxsports stats - Tigers V Chooks:

@weststigerman said in Foxsports stats - Tigers V Chooks:

Is that a record low metres gained for a starting prop?

Sadly, Matulino and Packer must be our worst props pair ever!

PaCKerlINo!

Packer’s stats are criminal. Must not be at WT’s in 2021.

@69-05-41 said in Foxsports stats - Tigers V Chooks:

Packer’s stats are criminal. Must not be at WT’s in 2021.

He should have been punted when he gave away three penalties, went to the bin and gotta suspended in 13 mins weeks ago.

How many decoys for packer tho 👀🔥

@weststigerman said in Foxsports stats - Tigers V Chooks:

Is that a record low metres gained for a starting prop?

Packer = 3 runs for 16 meters = 5.33 meters per run = catch the ball and fall over.

Recent Topics

Support our community by clicking here and joining our Forum Support Scheme