@tigerbalm said in Bali brawl:
jesus, how drunk do you have to be to consider trading blows with that monster.
He’s about the size of Hulk Hogan in his prime … although not quite as muscular.
You’d have to consider yourself a goer, or be full as a goog, to take him on lol
Maybe there is some light at the end of the tunnel after all.
@balmain-boy said in Signing Suggestions & Rumours:
@Elderslie_Tiger said in Signing Suggestions & Rumours:
@jrtiger
His coach Justin Holbrook rates him the best prop in the world he is 24 185 cm & 106kg a huge man if we could get him WOWHe’d be one of the smallest props in the nrl so you’d want him to have a hell of a lot of mongrel. Easily the smallest prop in our team. Never seen him play though. If he’s like Gallen then could be a great pick up
Taller and heavier than Gallen.
@WT2K said in Knee injury may force Matulino to hang up boots:
@Muffstar said in Knee injury may force Matulino to hang up boots:
I wonder what the odds of Burgess getting medically retired ? I bet there wont be any issues nor drawn out drama like what is happening with Mats.
This article suggests they most likely won’t be getting an exemption for him if he retires. https://www.theage.com.au/sport/nrl/burgess-retirement-could-leave-souths-millions-short-in-salary-cap-20191010-p52zhm.html
Try reading it again… they’ll ask for salary cap relief the same as they did with Inglis.
Toddy will have a coffee with him and give him the all clear.
@Madgic said in John Bateman:
@TIGER Bateman has a good football brain but NO other brain cells at all. Saw a comment from him on Instagram - he spells “thought” as f-o-r-t! He will follow the loudest voice like all dills do.
Spells it as he pronounces it. 
@Yossarian said in Balmain fans healing:
Nope doesn’t help at all. Canberra getting dudded doesn’t heal anything. 1989 will be a sore point until the day I die. I’ve never watched a replay in full and never will. The sight of Bill Harrigan still makes me bitter.
With you all the way.
@Wagga_Tiger said in Balmain fans healing:
Do people seriously still have a problem with this 30 years later?
Yes!
@GNR4LIFE said in 2019 NRL Grand Finals *Spoilers:
@cktiger said in 2019 NRL Grand Finals *Spoilers:
@tigerbill said in 2019 NRL Grand Finals *Spoilers:
@cktiger said in 2019 NRL Grand Finals *Spoilers:
@ElleryHanley said in 2019 NRL Grand Finals *Spoilers:
You just can’t have a situation where one ref can wave six again and dramatically impact the play…and one says no. There were80 000 people screaming, so all the players would have known was the CLEAR six again signal.
Annesley is delusional rattling on about the sec ref ovveruled and they called it out four times. No waya player can be expected to see one signal and then try to listen out for a contradictory call with 80 000 people yelling.
.It wasn’t six again . In the end the right call.
Cronk getting 10 was the wrong call.I’ll spell it out for you as clearly as possible.
Whether it was the right call or not doesn’t matter; it’s the changing of the decision at a crucial time. If they had known it was the last, they would have played differently. It’s not hard to understand mate.So you would prefer the wrong call?
Nobody actually knows if the Raiders heard them call last tackle (4 times apparently) but are jumping to conclusions.Bit ignorant to suggest they didn’t hear the call. What you are suggesting is that with 10 minutes to go in a grand final with the scores level, they were happy to take the tackle on the last in the attacking 20. Unlikely.
Bit ignorant to jump to conclusions without any evidence I’d think. I wasn’t saying anything except nobody on here knows for sure if they heard the call or not… including you. Thanks anyway for offering nothing but another guess.
@tigerbill said in 2019 NRL Grand Finals *Spoilers:
@cktiger said in 2019 NRL Grand Finals *Spoilers:
@ElleryHanley said in 2019 NRL Grand Finals *Spoilers:
You just can’t have a situation where one ref can wave six again and dramatically impact the play…and one says no. There were80 000 people screaming, so all the players would have known was the CLEAR six again signal.
Annesley is delusional rattling on about the sec ref ovveruled and they called it out four times. No waya player can be expected to see one signal and then try to listen out for a contradictory call with 80 000 people yelling.
It wasn’t six again . In the end the right call.
Cronk getting 10 was the wrong call.I’ll spell it out for you as clearly as possible.
Whether it was the right call or not doesn’t matter; it’s the changing of the decision at a crucial time. If they had known it was the last, they would have played differently. It’s not hard to understand mate.
So you would prefer the wrong call?
Nobody actually knows if the Raiders heard them call last tackle (4 times apparently) but are jumping to conclusions.
@ElleryHanley said in 2019 NRL Grand Finals *Spoilers:
You just can’t have a situation where one ref can wave six again and dramatically impact the play…and one says no. There were80 000 people screaming, so all the players would have known was the CLEAR six again signal.
Annesley is delusional rattling on about the sec ref ovveruled and they called it out four times. No waya player can be expected to see one signal and then try to listen out for a contradictory call with 80 000 people yelling.
It wasn’t six again . In the end the right call.
Cronk getting 10 was the wrong call.