Joined
Last Online
Recent Posts
posted in Contracts read more

@Newtown said in Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion:

@avocadoontoast said in Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion:

@TigerSkins said in Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion:

Just goes to show how shonky some of this stuff is with other clubs … after signing Arrow they claim they cant afford LM, we don’t have enough in our cap to fit him in … a week later LM is about to sign a 3 year deal with them … !! that’s bulldust … let’s hope that the Roosters play hard ball and don’t allow the transfer for this season … and what’s does the NRL think of these types of signings where they can clearly see something is not right about it … nothing … !! Just goes to show that NRL itself is on the take … they allow the stronger clubs to get stronger and don’t care if the weaker clubs get weaker … !!

The NRL isn’t on the take. He didn’t sign with us because he didn’t want to, same with Arrow. Regardless of the rubbish we’re force fed, we are not an attractive club. The elite players don’t want to play for us.

The elite players don’t want to play for us because there is always a huge scarcity of elite players who actually sign to play for us. It’s a never ending circle of rowing upstream for our club.

In the real world the more elite players you had on your books would have to mean less to go around for them and everyone else.
We’re obviously not living in a ‘real’ world.

posted in General Discussion read more

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

So far, the last few days, no one whose pro-Trump has dared address anything that’s too hard to answer. Mainly, Trump’s actions regarding the Central Park Five after they were exonerated through DNA and why he would tell elected members of government who were born in the US to go back to their own countries. No one has wanted to touch those questions. Rather, it’s safer to question the one asking the questions. I’m hoping someone is brave enough to answer the rambling question, but one has already tried to distract from the question. Too hard to answer for him I guess.

Here’s Trump’s actual words when asked about the Central Park Five - 30 years after his original remarks when they confessed
“You have people on both sides of that. They admitted their guilt. If you look at Linda Fairstein and if you look at some of the prosecutors, they think that the city should never have settled that case. So we’ll leave it at that.”
Gee …
As for the loud mouth lefty Senators he told to go home to offer their assistance there… yes, only one was born outside America.
He was obviously referring to their heritage…
“Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how it is done.”
As for his ‘ramblings’… so what?
You get what you see rather than someone hiding their true self away.

posted in Contracts read more

@avocadoontoast said in Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion:

@TigerSkins said in Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion:

Just goes to show how shonky some of this stuff is with other clubs … after signing Arrow they claim they cant afford LM, we don’t have enough in our cap to fit him in … a week later LM is about to sign a 3 year deal with them … !! that’s bulldust … let’s hope that the Roosters play hard ball and don’t allow the transfer for this season … and what’s does the NRL think of these types of signings where they can clearly see something is not right about it … nothing … !! Just goes to show that NRL itself is on the take … they allow the stronger clubs to get stronger and don’t care if the weaker clubs get weaker … !!

The NRL isn’t on the take. He didn’t sign with us because he didn’t want to, same with Arrow. Regardless of the rubbish we’re force fed, we are not an attractive club. The elite players don’t want to play for us.

I still can’t see how Souffs are an ‘attractive’ club… obviously that bonehead Crowe is the lure.
Won the title once this century (same as us) and have a supporter base filled with sycophants and toothless cretins.

posted in General Discussion read more

@formerguest said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@colinbh said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@formerguest said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

Geez, regardless of anyone’s leaning, one President acted for all his constituents, whilst the other dog whistles and attacks children or others that don’t agree with him on Twitter, there is no comparison to be made.

Plus the first Trump economic policy change of any significance came into affect on January 1 2018, when the previous government’s policies were already achieving the same gains that he wants to claim. It also caused further acceleration of the National debt, but hey, everyone with open eyes knew that was going to happen.

What a load of crap. I keep telling you to get off the ABC and CNN.

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

@colinbh said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@formerguest said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

Geez, regardless of anyone’s leaning, one President acted for all his constituents, whilst the other dog whistles and attacks children or others that don’t agree with him on Twitter, there is no comparison to be made.

Plus the first Trump economic policy change of any significance came into affect on January 1 2018, when the previous government’s policies were already achieving the same gains that he wants to claim. It also caused further acceleration of the National debt, but hey, everyone with open eyes knew that was going to happen.

What a load of crap. I keep telling you to get off the ABC and CNN.

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

Yeah FG, get off CNN. They’re the ones telling you Trump attacks people who are critical of him, even children. That’s obviously something you can’t read yourself when you look at his Twitter feed.

The best part of it is, that more often than not I get that sort of stuff from the night time far right night shows on SKY news here on Foxtel where it is glorified in a ‘he really put that child in her place’ attitude.

I enjoyed reading the last few pages after having a rest and the breaking down of individual points, along with the hilarity of it. Imagine having to nit pick on a few points when there are literally hundreds, if not thousands to chose from.

As opposed to when Obama was in power and you would have been tuning in to The View to see what he was up to?

posted in General Discussion read more

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@cktiger said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@twentyforty said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@twentyforty said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@twentyforty said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

The idea that a political leader is race bias is, in many instances, a very immature attempt to appeal to the race bias in others. We should all check our factual data. Again, how is it that some know how others feel? Hate is an emotion isn’t it?

Except Trump isn’t a politician. He’s a billionaire who ran for President and won. He can’t be compared to career politicians and how they carry themselves.

I know a lot has happened over the Christmas break and numerous alcoholic beverages have been consumed with family and friends. So you’ll need to allow me some time to catch up. So, pray tell, when did the POTUS stop being a political leader?

The ImPOTUS is not a career politician like everyone else. Thus, it’s no surprise that he doesn’t act like one.

That’s a good thing right?
Because my understanding is that’s what the voters wanted. A “political leader” who was not a career Politician.
Isn’t that how democracy should work?
It became clear to me at least, as the election campaign rolled forward, that voting in a POTUS because he/she/they were black, female or whatever didn’t make sense, when what they really wanted was a stronger economy.

Now you’re the one who whose claiming to know how others think and feel. How do you know they were voting for Hillary and Obama simply because one was a woman and the other was black?

Well there were plenty who came out and said just that… plus the fact their campaigns targeted those groups.

Who said what? Every campaign targets specific groups. You don’t think Trump targets minorities?

Wait, he does

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/donald-trump-makes-an-awkward-pitch-to-black-voters-in-atlanta/amp

Did I say he didn’t?
You’re the one with your head in the sand if you don’t think Obama was pitched at blacks, Clinton at women, and those people voted for them in droves because of that.
As an aside… it’s worked out great for the blacks that Trump got elected - they now enjoy the lowest unemployment figures since statistics were first recorded.

posted in General Discussion read more

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@twentyforty said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@twentyforty said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@twentyforty said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

The idea that a political leader is race bias is, in many instances, a very immature attempt to appeal to the race bias in others. We should all check our factual data. Again, how is it that some know how others feel? Hate is an emotion isn’t it?

Except Trump isn’t a politician. He’s a billionaire who ran for President and won. He can’t be compared to career politicians and how they carry themselves.

I know a lot has happened over the Christmas break and numerous alcoholic beverages have been consumed with family and friends. So you’ll need to allow me some time to catch up. So, pray tell, when did the POTUS stop being a political leader?

The ImPOTUS is not a career politician like everyone else. Thus, it’s no surprise that he doesn’t act like one.

That’s a good thing right?
Because my understanding is that’s what the voters wanted. A “political leader” who was not a career Politician.
Isn’t that how democracy should work?
It became clear to me at least, as the election campaign rolled forward, that voting in a POTUS because he/she/they were black, female or whatever didn’t make sense, when what they really wanted was a stronger economy.

Now you’re the one who whose claiming to know how others think and feel. How do you know they were voting for Hillary and Obama simply because one was a woman and the other was black?

Well there were plenty who came out and said just that… plus the fact their campaigns targeted those groups.

posted in General Discussion read more

@formerguest said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@cktiger said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

For the last 3 years Trump voters have laughed till their sides hurt over the outrage of the left, telling them to harden up and to enjoy 7 more years, 6 more years, and now 5. Whenever Trump says or does something distasteful, they love it. One of the main reasons is because it “triggers” the libtards. They ignore things like kids being separated from their families, and comments disparaging POW’s, and even attacking them after they’ve passed away. All of that is fine. Say something about his daughter though, suddenly you’re sick, the comments are disgusting and you should consult a solicitor. All of a sudden the right feels a tinge or morality.

So you are defending yourself by saying that because you dislike someone’s politics or some of the things he has said that it’s ok to brand him an incestuous pedophile for kissing his own daughter?
Yeah, right.

It is only fair that @GNR4LIFE and others may think as such when this is what this man, who is now a President thinks about his own daughter.

FB_IMG_1577787058782.jpg

Only thing wrong with that is he didn’t say it.
Made up rubbish.
Do you believe everything you read?

posted in General Discussion read more

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

For the last 3 years Trump voters have laughed till their sides hurt over the outrage of the left, telling them to harden up and to enjoy 7 more years, 6 more years, and now 5. Whenever Trump says or does something distasteful, they love it. One of the main reasons is because it “triggers” the libtards. They ignore things like kids being separated from their families, and comments disparaging POW’s, and even attacking them after they’ve passed away. All of that is fine. Say something about his daughter though, suddenly you’re sick, the comments are disgusting and you should consult a solicitor. All of a sudden the right feels a tinge or morality.

So you are defending yourself by saying that because you dislike someone’s politics or some of the things he has said that it’s ok to brand him an incestuous pedophile for kissing his own daughter?
Yeah, right.

posted in General Discussion read more

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@cktiger said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@TillLindemann said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@TillLindemann said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@JD-Tiger said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@formerguest said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

FB_IMG_1577586415098.jpg

What am I missing? Why were they outraged? Who’s the girl?
All I see is Trump kissing some kid on the head, maybe a campaign thing or for publicity?

Are there further allegations which make this imply more?

I think it might have something to do with the chap on the right.

Also, pollies often kiss children, but it seems a bit creepy grabbing around the waist like that.

Biden got crucified for less. Could you imagine if that was Clinton in the pic, kissing a child. Sheesh.

Not really … if it was his daughter.
This pic is Trump cuddling his own daughter and kissing her on the forehead.
End of story.

We all know how he thinks of her.

Seriously?
That’s a disgusting comment.

posted in General Discussion read more

@GNR4LIFE said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@TillLindemann said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@TillLindemann said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@JD-Tiger said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

@formerguest said in Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here:

FB_IMG_1577586415098.jpg

What am I missing? Why were they outraged? Who’s the girl?
All I see is Trump kissing some kid on the head, maybe a campaign thing or for publicity?

Are there further allegations which make this imply more?

I think it might have something to do with the chap on the right.

Also, pollies often kiss children, but it seems a bit creepy grabbing around the waist like that.

Biden got crucified for less. Could you imagine if that was Clinton in the pic, kissing a child. Sheesh.

Not really … if it was his daughter.
This pic is Trump cuddling his own daughter and kissing her on the forehead.
End of story.