I turned it off after 30 minutes…
Credit due where it’s deserved, Melbourne are very, VERY good
I am still watching and, you know what Kul, Melb have not been ‘that’ good tonight. It is just a normal game / training drill.
Yes, great side…but they have barely raised a sweat.
This is entirely on us.
Our edge D is Z grade…Madge has had 2.5 years to get the edge D fixed, and has failed miserably.
We need more than rhetoric and speeches. They have their place and time, but we need a lot more.
We need a real coaching team, smart assistants, and basic skills and patterns.
This is just beyond acceptable. Anyone who accepts it at this point is part of the cultural problem we have. At any serious club that first half would have massive ramifications. Let’s see what we do.
so in all honesty who would we get? who would want to do it?
Someone who can ‘coach’ patterns, coach D, young assistants with tactical nous…
It is really important the young blokes we have learn and have a coach with game plans and tactical nous.
Ciraldo would be good.
Ciraldo? Not sure how he’d go…look at Barrett. Both are/were worldbeaters at Penrith, Barrett has been a big flop at Canterbury.
But but he was the man behind Penrith’s attack. Or was that just because no one wanted to give Ivan credit?
Barrett was Penriths attack coach so why would people credit Ivan instead?
Penriths attack is just as good this year as last so it goes to show that players with talent are the reason why a team excels in attack moreso than who is coaching them. Look at how well Barrett’s supposed genius coaching style translates to coaching a club who lacks talent.
It’s pretty black and white.