Bennett is looking more like a knob every year if this turns out how we all expect it to. Sure we got the happy with his centres line but he also said we “won’t be signing Latrell.” - more than likely after it was already done. I get the disdain for the media but out and out lying makes him a mockery.
He plays the game, quite successfully. Makes our guys look like amateurs.
The new Chairman should have taken a leaf out of his book.
Didn’t our Chairman indicate that we would sign Mitchell in one of his articles ? If so agree not a good look.
Hahaha, SG is back.
They deleted my old account.
Smoking Gun, used to have inside ‘scoops’ on possible WT signings. He used to cop it a bit as they were sometimes not correct. I think he thought his old account was deleted and came back as New Smoking Gun with the LM ‘scoop’.
If I was Mitchell and was mulling over where to play to be in a consistent top 4 side over the next 4 years, I would choose Souths without out a doubt. I also think from a cultural and heritage perspective Souths would be better.
If Mitchell is being driven by wanting to be a side which is very inconsistent but having the opportunity to help build something special then the Tigers would be a good fit.
If it is money then it really is a toss of the coin as he will get good dollars where ever he goes.
Frankly, if he comes to the Tigers great, fantastic to get bums on seats, memberships etc, great for sponsors but if he doesn’t so be it.
So no conflict of interest here, being the Chair and major sponsor of the club ?
What’s the conflict? is he going to vote to lessen or withdraw Brydens sponsorship NO for gods sake look for the positives not the negatives
Was just a question keep your nickers on.