Aloiai ran for 187m (most by either team), made 19 tackles with no misses and made no errors.

What should he have done to be more Prop-like?

We only have one NRL level half, Brooks will be back at 7 next week. All the others have had plenty of chances and have all shown less game management than Brooks.

Brooks does have vision and skill and does play heads up football as shown in this example from round 9.

In this example 5 players worked together to create a brilliant try. No current NRL player can do it by themselves.

Did the whingers notice Mitchell Moses’s 3 errors, 4 missed tackles, the failed chip and chases, the multiple times he made the wrong decision in attack?

Some of you need to watch the game with your eyes not your preconceptions and not compare the game of Tigers players with the highlights of other players.

Momo has shown a freakish ability to score tries in heavy traffic. That’s not as easy to put a value on compared to size and speed but as he is young, one of our best goal kickers and does everything expected of a centre, I think he is a big asset to the team.

I also like how he came back from some mistakes last year, seems to be mentally tough.

Packer and Musgrove sharing 80min as enforcers
Aloiai and Mikaele sharing 80min as impact runners
Twal at lock for 60-80min as defensive/workhorse
Blore on the bench to cover lock and 2nd row

Looks very balanced to me

I think brainfade is a bit unfair. Players couldn’t be interchanged because of injuries. Jennings injury meant MCK was wing in attack and centre in defence, leaving Mbye on the wing in defence. McIntyre seemed to be playing mostly at lock.
Tigers didn’t seem to have much possession in the 2nd half.

BUZZ ROTHFIELD

Dogs are in the hunt for every contracted and uncontracted player in the NRL and Super League. They plan to buy all the players so no one else can field a team. I don’t understand how a salary cap works and if I make enough predictions am am sure to get one right eventually.

Madge has changed the structure of the attack at least 4 times this year. Brooks received the ball a lot more than Benji in the first few rounds with both halves staying on their own side, then it was 50/50 with both playing on both sides of the field, then Benji was made halfback, now Brooks plays as the controller and distributor in the centre of the field.
If you are going to bag the guy, at least pay attention to what is going on. These changes take time to work out and Madge has been experimenting because he has a lot of versatile players and no superstars to build the spine around.
I am sure the Tigers are looking at getting the best 1 or 6 they can then putting Mbye and Doueihi in the gaps now that they have had opportunities at a few positions.

Harry’s determination to tackle every run, back up every team mate in defence and chase every loose ball is unbeatable. His desire to compete for everything will be a massive loss.

@hobbo1 said in Tigers tell Reynolds he's free to find a new club:

Most of his kicks are slotted into the oppositions bread baskets

I have noticed that the whingers just say random rubbish and don’t offer any stats or proof.

Admins, please close this thread, my question has been answered

@happy_tiger said in Why are downvotes limited?:

This one …cats

You got me there, and the @willow one?

@happy_tiger said in Why are downvotes limited?:

Willow answered it …and then you got annoyed he brought up cats …this was my original point …can’t anyone call you out ??
You can’t have it both ways …

Please provide the quote where @willow answered the question.
Also provide the quote where I mentioned cats.

@mike said in Why are downvotes limited?:

Well you got your answer from @Kul but it appears you didn’t like the reasoning.

And thanks for making up a story about me to make your point.

lol, bad timing @Mike

@Kul said in Why are downvotes limited?:

In the past we had people have all out wars with each other over down-voting
You will survive if you run out of your daily quota

Thank you for answering my question.

@happy_tiger said in Why are downvotes limited?:

but your trying to tell Mods how to run their Forum

I originally asked “why are downvotes limited?” which is only a question.

But thanks for butting in again trying to make an argument to get involved in.

@mike said in Why are downvotes limited?:

Because civilised people have conversations.

There is a time and a place for everything

@happy_tiger said in Why are downvotes limited?:

I had and disagreed with your opinion …same as you are disagreeing with many’s opinion’s now
Some on here like a joke or banter after a hard’s days work …Mods pull it up if it goes over the top …it’s their Forum when push comes to shove …you have to live by their rules …bit like when you get a home loan …you choose what you want …don’t complain when your not happy with it …change banks

So I should leave the forum if I don’t agree with you?

If what you are saying is correct, the forum rules should be changed to reflect that. The rules about abusing players and officials should be removed. The rules about hijacking threads should be removed.

@avocadoontoast said in Why are downvotes limited?:

I really enjoyed the cats and magpie discussion.

That’s great but why can’t there be banter sections where people can relax and have fun and content sections like “Signing suggestions and rumours”