Website
Joined
Last Online
Recent Posts
posted in Wests Tigers Discussion read more

@Mccarry:

@happy tiger:

@Mccarry:

@gallagher:

I stopped donating this year.
I don’t feel any less a supporter.

Sorry Gallagher, perhaps you could help me understand that. What specifically are you supporting? Team performance, clubs financial position.

You do know they can’t hear you through the TV right?

Ahhh , I thought we weren’t judging either way ??

I’m not judging a persons reasons for being a fan. I am sticking to the point that there is a difference.

You do know that your’re attendance or non-attendance at a game doesn’t effect the on-field performance right?

posted in Previous Seasons Archive read more

Goal kicking practice will be sometime after training starts but before training ends.

I hope this helps.

posted in Previous Seasons Archive read more

Players enjoying themselves?

Time to sack the coach.

posted in Wests Tigers Discussion read more

Maintained his silence by asking his agent to talk to the press…

Seems legit

posted in Wests Tigers Discussion read more

I mentioned this when he first came through, Didn’t seem like much then, but I think others confused him with his dad.

posted in Previous Seasons Archive read more

I have a feeling his selections are based on salary cap restrictions, can anyone confirm or deny?

posted in Previous Seasons Archive read more

@willow:

1. Tedesco
2. Addo-Carr
3. Simona
4. Naiqama
5. Nofoaluma
6. Moses
7. Rankin
8. Seumanufagai
9. Farah
10. Sue
11. Aloiai
12. Lawrence
13. Lovett

14. Felise
15. Sironen
16. Edwards
17. Grant (Graham if Grant not fit)

Willow do you think Rankin is the answer at half?

Mind you I haven’t been paying much attention to his career….

posted in Previous Seasons Archive read more

@Russell:

@Sataris:

Someone who has a better grasp of the rules may be able to correct me,

Is this related at all to how the “attacking” team is defined in the rules?

I believe under the rules the attacking team is determined by field position rather than possession of the ball?

e.g. If you kick the ball into the referee it’s a scrum to the attacking team,
So in theory on last tackle in the opp half just belt the ball into the ref and it should be 6 again…

In relation to the infringement of a 2nd ball, the scrum would go to the attacking team… which is Newcastle.

But I’m not exactly an NRL Referee

What happened to “the first infringement” which was Sims deliberately kicking the into Rankin. Regardless of whether Rankin knocks on, grounds the ball in goal or Uate scoring a try - it should go back to the first infringement. Sheesh! Badger.

What does that make it 4 from 16 games under him now?

I don’t know, That’s why I’m asking. It’s the only way Archer’s comments make sense.

posted in Previous Seasons Archive read more

Someone who has a better grasp of the rules may be able to correct me,

Is this related at all to how the “attacking” team is defined in the rules?

I believe under the rules the attacking team is determined by field position rather than possession of the ball?

e.g. If you kick the ball into the referee it’s a scrum to the attacking team,
So in theory on last tackle in the opp half just belt the ball into the ref and it should be 6 again…

In relation to the infringement of a 2nd ball, the scrum would go to the attacking team… which is Newcastle.

But I’m not exactly an NRL Referee

posted in Other Sports read more

@Russell:

Should be stripped of all wins in the past year.

You want her to be stripped of titles won last year whilst using something that was not prohibited last year?

:crazy