Once again i will state it again, in his initial interview which was on tuesday 14th, IMO Woods pretty much said he would not be happy if JT waa his coach for the next 3 years. What he said 1 week later and what he said after is irrelevant. The fact that the saviour is now the ex coach proves my point. So keep finding quotes from Woods about how much he loves JT but anyone with common sense will tell you that its so far from the teuth its not funny. Maybe he loves him as a mate but he definitely didnt want to be coached by him and from their results on the field neither did anybody else.
We’re going to have to stop our discussion because you are obstinate to the point of idiocy. Literally to the point of idiocy, I don’t think I am alone when I say that reading some of your comments, I cannot tell if you are a really good troll or just bone-headedly intransigent.
It’s fine to talk about the club with people who have different views, who have sound arguments but draw different conclusions. That’s fine.
But you’ve gone all Trumpian on us, you are stupifyingly selective about what you choose to accept and what you choose to reject, even though they are all media sources.
You can’t say Woods “pretty much said he would not be happy if JT was the coach”, because he didn’t say that. “Oh,” you say, “I know he didn’t use those exact words, but that’s what he meant”. So then I produce a verifiable quote from Woods himself about what he meant, what he actually says he meant, if there was doubt before “here is what I meant”.
And you say… “That is so far from the truth. Definitely did not want to be coached by him.” I don’t understand how you can take one set of comments by a player as gospel, but a second set of comments as lies. There are only 3 options - either he consistently tells the truth, or he consistently lies, or he mixes it up. And if he mixes it up, then you can’t honestly derive any meaning from what he says, because you will never be able to work out when he’s lying and when he isn’t.
And lastly, to paraphrase your comments, “because the coach got sacked and the team played badly two games, the ENTIRE team also wanted JT gone”. What about Round 1 result then? The ENTIRE team played well Round 1, but suddenly they don’t support the coach any more because of losses 2 weeks later?
If none of what I just said makes sense you, then you are a lost cause. I mean post here all you like but I can’t see it being of much value to anyone, because you are so stubbornly one-track, and your retorts are so childish as to be embarrassing to read.
Yet you follow me around like a bad smell. Go away. JT is gone and never coming back, the captain the players and the majority of supporters didnt want him so thank god and good riddance.
If any of the 4 leave you can make a case that they did want JT. Why would they leave after getting what they wanted by having the coach removed?
So the players wanted JT and supported him? This is so sad, move on JT supporters he is gone. Stop trying to re write history. Or is this all Farahs fault aswell lol.