Critical with some level of discussion is what most people do. A very small % just lay into players or the club. Be it opinion or fact most of the people accused of being critical are simply discussing the things they think can be improved.
In general, yeah and and I am happy to be critical when it is reasonably deserved. Still some of the crap on here of late has been nothing sort of crazy, with the dump Brooks to reserve grade and/or put him on the market rubbish at the top level of ridiculousness.
See this is the issue.
Someone just stating Brooks is trash is one thing and probably should be moderated and a warning issued. However someone saying something along the lines of Brooks isnt taking control of a game and should spend a little time in reserve grade to have a think about that is a completely different thing.
It might be your opinion that anyone who writes those posts are idiots and deserve some sort of correction but the truth is this is a forum and if someone has offered up reasons for their opinion the onus falls on YOU to debate their opinion not just openly call them crazy or state their opinions are ridiculous.
In this instance its the guys lashing out at other fans that are the problem that needs moderation more than the person who simply stated an opinion YOU didnt like.
You’re lucky however in that it seem the mods share your way of thinking.
(All contents just my opinion)
Spot on! I respect everyone’s opinion. What gets me fired up is when posters personally put crap on other posters or have a superior attitude thinking others are less intelligent or less in the know or have less football smarts.