More bad behaviour

Wests Tigers Discussion
Telltails
Member
Member
Posts: 2882
Joined: Fri 18 Apr, 2014 3:24 pm

Re: More bad behaviour

Post by Telltails » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 9:09 am

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:53 am
Telltails wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:26 am
Cultured Bogan wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 7:37 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 3:31 pm
Where’s the scandal?
I reckon, not sure what's a scandal.about consensual sex.

Lets not forget that publically sharing sexual videos without consent is an offence and that the other person in the video may not even know that they were being filmed.
There’s been no suggestion that anyone in the video was unaware they were being filmed. You are clutching at straws.
If there was no issue it would not be in the hands of the integrity unit and Napa would not be seeking legal representation.

Not sure how you would know, what is going on with the other person in the video at this point, but that persons privacy has been violated even if aware of the video being taken,, sharing publically is an issue, without consent.

Aside from that Napa himself would not consent to these videos being shared and so that in itself requires investigation.


Pawsandclaws
Member
Member
Posts: 3305
Joined: Sat 20 Jun, 2015 5:53 pm

Post by Pawsandclaws » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 9:12 am

simonthetiger wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 7:50 am
Have you seen the second video...there is some hilarious stuff in that.....
Now referred to NSW Police by Napa. What type of personality allows themselves to be filmed in an intimate act with a woman. Again, what personality allows a young woman to be demeaned in this way?

I'd suggest a life ban for Napa and the camera wimp involved. It is not too hard to work out who filmed it if you read the hints on the Rooster forum.

User avatar
Geo.
Member
Member
Posts: 30061
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Sandy Point NSW..

Post by Geo. » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 9:43 am

Rorters have a forum.. :? :? Didn't think they had fans apart from rent a crowd..
Wests Tigers don't need a Coach.. The playing group has taken over..
happy tiger wrote:
Thu 25 Oct, 2018 12:17 am
OK I was wrong
happy tiger wrote:
Thu 22 Nov, 2018 12:13 am
I know at times I'm not always the brightest light in the kitchen

Earl
Member
Member
Posts: 2082
Joined: Sat 18 Feb, 2017 9:21 am

Post by Earl » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 9:46 am

Geo. wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:38 am
Earl wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:34 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 12 Jan, 2019 10:33 pm
Some do reform. Look at Packer.
Exactly. You have to give people chances as well.
And he plays for us..
Honestly I believe people deserve chances and some of this stuff does seem to be overblown. I mean the Cowboys player touching a girls thigh being crucified is in a lot of ways farcical.

You are right in that playing for us is an important factor but I expect them to provide better value than what Packer has so far provided us.

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 23059
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 10:30 am

Telltails wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 9:09 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:53 am
Telltails wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:26 am
Cultured Bogan wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 7:37 am


I reckon, not sure what's a scandal.about consensual sex.

Lets not forget that publically sharing sexual videos without consent is an offence and that the other person in the video may not even know that they were being filmed.
There’s been no suggestion that anyone in the video was unaware they were being filmed. You are clutching at straws.
If there was no issue it would not be in the hands of the integrity unit and Napa would not be seeking legal representation.

Not sure how you would know, what is going on with the other person in the video at this point, but that persons privacy has been violated even if aware of the video being taken,, sharing publically is an issue, without consent.

Aside from that Napa himself would not consent to these videos being shared and so that in itself requires investigation.
The only way Napa can be in any trouble would be if he shared it without her consent, which is a stretch. Why would a player leak their own sex tape. That’s pretty dumb, even for an NRL player. If either of them are going to release it, it’s more likely her, seeing as how you can’t see her face. Revenge porn is a big thing atm. But she could be totally innocent to, and a third party could have gotten their hands on it, which would mean there is no story (no story meaning no scandal of an NRL player doing anything wrong)


User avatar
Cultured Bogan
Member
Member
Posts: 18500
Joined: Tue 15 Sep, 2009 11:20 pm
Location: Blue Mountains

Post by Cultured Bogan » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 10:49 am

Telltails wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:26 am
Cultured Bogan wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 7:37 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 3:31 pm
Where’s the scandal?
I reckon, not sure what's a scandal.about consensual sex.

Lets not forget that publically sharing sexual videos without consent is an offence and that the other person in the video may not even know that they were being filmed.
Wasn't aware that was the case. If so we'll yeah obviously that is an issue.
"This club means a lot to me and I really love this club, I love playing here, I love playing with all of the boys, it's what I've known for pretty much all of my life and I'm happy to be here." - Luke Brooks.

Cuando llegue el día, y estoy parado a las puertas del cielo, será Dios pidiendo mi perdón...

happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 41835
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm
Location: Watching Waiting Lurking

Post by happy tiger » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 11:32 am

Geo. wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 9:01 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:53 am
Telltails wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:26 am
Cultured Bogan wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 7:37 am


I reckon, not sure what's a scandal.about consensual sex.

Lets not forget that publically sharing sexual videos without consent is an offence and that the other person in the video may not even know that they were being filmed.
There’s been no suggestion that anyone in the video was unaware they were being filmed. You are clutching at straws.
It hasn't been said anywhere they gave permission for it to be shared on social media which is an offence..so no straws at all
Rangas see ......

Can't be trusted

Should all be moved to Tasmania , keep them away from real people

Spud Murphy
Member
Member
Posts: 2529
Joined: Sat 13 May, 2017 5:04 pm
Location: Third Heaven

Post by Spud Murphy » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 11:42 am

happy tiger wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 11:32 am
Geo. wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 9:01 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:53 am
Telltails wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:26 am



Lets not forget that publically sharing sexual videos without consent is an offence and that the other person in the video may not even know that they were being filmed.
There’s been no suggestion that anyone in the video was unaware they were being filmed. You are clutching at straws.
It hasn't been said anywhere they gave permission for it to be shared on social media which is an offence..so no straws at all
Rangas see ......

Can't be trusted

Should all be moved to Tasmania , keep them away from real people
Gladstone would be a better location for them - arse end of the earth :lol:

Telltails
Member
Member
Posts: 2882
Joined: Fri 18 Apr, 2014 3:24 pm

Post by Telltails » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 12:19 pm

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 10:30 am
Telltails wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 9:09 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:53 am
Telltails wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:26 am



Lets not forget that publically sharing sexual videos without consent is an offence and that the other person in the video may not even know that they were being filmed.
There’s been no suggestion that anyone in the video was unaware they were being filmed. You are clutching at straws.
If there was no issue it would not be in the hands of the integrity unit and Napa would not be seeking legal representation.

Not sure how you would know, what is going on with the other person in the video at this point, but that persons privacy has been violated even if aware of the video being taken,, sharing publically is an issue, without consent.

Aside from that Napa himself would not consent to these videos being shared and so that in itself requires investigation.
The only way Napa can be in any trouble would be if he shared it without her consent, which is a stretch. Why would a player leak their own sex tape. That’s pretty dumb, even for an NRL player. If either of them are going to release it, it’s more likely her, seeing as how you can’t see her face. Revenge porn is a big thing atm. But she could be totally innocent to, and a third party could have gotten their hands on it, which would mean there is no story (no story meaning no scandal of an NRL player doing anything wrong)
That may be the case but you only find that out by investigating and until they do that, all involved will be under some level of suspicion, and or may be even victims.

Regardless of the outcome who knows how the NRL view it, in terms of how it impacts on the image of the game. They seem to think they have some ownership over the players private lives when they are "exposed" to the public, so nothing would surprise me anymore.

Toowoomba Tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu 15 Dec, 2016 12:35 pm

Post by Toowoomba Tiger » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 12:35 pm

I often wonder why it seems ok to discriminate against redheads. Especially when they are suggested to be inferior or different to the redt of us.

Replace ranga with black or muslim in those posts above and the reactions and reply's would be fierce.

Not having a go at you guys and no im not a redhead and yes i have joked around about gingers and bloodnuts and all that. But it does go to show there is very little balance with discrimination these days.

Like someone who posted earlier about Bolton. If it was reversed and a woman touched a guys thigh and he made a police complaint, he would be somewhat ridiculed for it.

Sorry but the redhead thing just always makes me think about whats considered ok and a laugh in comparison to what most consider discrimination or racism today.
previously known as 'The Tooth'

User avatar
TigerTiger
Member
Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Tue 13 Jun, 2017 4:56 pm

Post by TigerTiger » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 12:38 pm

Toowoomba Tiger wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 12:35 pm
I often wonder why it seems ok to discriminate against redheads. Especially when they are suggested to be inferior or different to the redt of us.

Replace ranga with black or muslim in those posts above and the reactions and reply's would be fierce.

Not having a go at you guys and no im not a redhead and yes i have joked around about gingers and bloodnuts and all that. But it does go to show there is very little balance with discrimination these days.

Like someone who posted earlier about Bolton. If it was reversed and a woman touched a guys thigh and he made a police complaint, he would be somewhat ridiculed for it.

Sorry but the redhead thing just always makes me think about whats considered ok and a laugh in comparison to what most consider discrimination or racism today.
It is a pity, all this PC rubbish. For me, having a joke with your mates at each other is part of Aussie culture. At school we used to have a dig at each other, always finding something to have a laugh at. Red hair, tall, short, fat, skinny... not bullying but in good humour.
A one eyed supporter, mostly :crazy, always :sign:

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 23059
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 12:40 pm

simonthetiger wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 7:50 am
Have you seen the second video...there is some hilarious stuff in that.....
Just saw it. The shadow boxing. Is that what Napa was using as inspiration?

Toowoomba Tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu 15 Dec, 2016 12:35 pm

Post by Toowoomba Tiger » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 12:44 pm

Yep, thats the point tigertiger. It is rubbish for the most part. Its usually pretty clear the difference between having a dig in humour and a straight out discriminitive slur. Yet the do gooders will always take offence. But yet i never hear anyone up in arms when redheads are jpked about
previously known as 'The Tooth'

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 23059
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 12:55 pm

Toowoomba Tiger wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 12:35 pm
I often wonder why it seems ok to discriminate against redheads. Especially when they are suggested to be inferior or different to the redt of us.

Replace ranga with black or muslim in those posts above and the reactions and reply's would be fierce.

Not having a go at you guys and no im not a redhead and yes i have joked around about gingers and bloodnuts and all that. But it does go to show there is very little balance with discrimination these days.

Like someone who posted earlier about Bolton. If it was reversed and a woman touched a guys thigh and he made a police complaint, he would be somewhat ridiculed for it.

Sorry but the redhead thing just always makes me think about whats considered ok and a laugh in comparison to what most consider discrimination or racism today.
There are people who do legitimately hate blacks and Muslim’s. I’ve never met anyone who legitimately hates redheads. Anything negatively said about them is pure jest.

hobbo
Member
Member
Posts: 10241
Joined: Mon 10 Mar, 2014 5:03 pm

Post by hobbo » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 1:09 pm

Spud Murphy wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 11:42 am
happy tiger wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 11:32 am
Geo. wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 9:01 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:53 am

There’s been no suggestion that anyone in the video was unaware they were being filmed. You are clutching at straws.
It hasn't been said anywhere they gave permission for it to be shared on social media which is an offence..so no straws at all
Rangas see ......

Can't be trusted

Should all be moved to Tasmania , keep them away from real people
Gladstone would be a better location for them - arse end of the earth :lol:
Drove through it once
(With central locking on )

Absolutely the arse end of the world
:lol:
#tencenttoads
We need mongrel ..
No more plodders !

Red88 Tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri 08 Dec, 2017 5:37 pm

Post by Red88 Tiger » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 1:13 pm

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 12:55 pm
Toowoomba Tiger wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 12:35 pm
I often wonder why it seems ok to discriminate against redheads. Especially when they are suggested to be inferior or different to the redt of us.

Replace ranga with black or muslim in those posts above and the reactions and reply's would be fierce.

Not having a go at you guys and no im not a redhead and yes i have joked around about gingers and bloodnuts and all that. But it does go to show there is very little balance with discrimination these days.

Like someone who posted earlier about Bolton. If it was reversed and a woman touched a guys thigh and he made a police complaint, he would be somewhat ridiculed for it.

Sorry but the redhead thing just always makes me think about whats considered ok and a laugh in comparison to what most consider discrimination or racism today.
There are people who do legitimately hate blacks and Muslim’s. I’ve never met anyone who legitimately hates redheads. Anything negatively said about them is pure jest.
As a red I copped a fair bit at school being the only one. The biggest advice I can give to someone bullied most is just one sided humour. It's more about the way it is said and what tone that makes the difference.
Most bullies stop when you do the same thing back to them without lashing out

bathursttiger
Member
Member
Posts: 2958
Joined: Thu 02 Dec, 2010 5:21 pm

Post by bathursttiger » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 3:38 pm

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 10:30 am
Telltails wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 9:09 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:53 am
Telltails wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:26 am



Lets not forget that publically sharing sexual videos without consent is an offence and that the other person in the video may not even know that they were being filmed.
There’s been no suggestion that anyone in the video was unaware they were being filmed. You are clutching at straws.
If there was no issue it would not be in the hands of the integrity unit and Napa would not be seeking legal representation.

Not sure how you would know, what is going on with the other person in the video at this point, but that persons privacy has been violated even if aware of the video being taken,, sharing publically is an issue, without consent.

Aside from that Napa himself would not consent to these videos being shared and so that in itself requires investigation.
The only way Napa can be in any trouble would be if he shared it without her consent, which is a stretch. Why would a player leak their own sex tape. That’s pretty dumb, even for an NRL player. If either of them are going to release it, it’s more likely her, seeing as how you can’t see her face. Revenge porn is a big thing atm. But she could be totally innocent to, and a third party could have gotten their hands on it, which would mean there is no story (no story meaning no scandal of an NRL player doing anything wrong)
I don’t think that Napa is the sharpest tool in the shed.

Furious1
Member
Member
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu 09 Jun, 2011 6:42 pm

Post by Furious1 » Sun 13 Jan, 2019 4:51 pm

bathursttiger wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 3:38 pm
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 10:30 am
Telltails wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 9:09 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 13 Jan, 2019 8:53 am

There’s been no suggestion that anyone in the video was unaware they were being filmed. You are clutching at straws.
If there was no issue it would not be in the hands of the integrity unit and Napa would not be seeking legal representation.

Not sure how you would know, what is going on with the other person in the video at this point, but that persons privacy has been violated even if aware of the video being taken,, sharing publically is an issue, without consent.

Aside from that Napa himself would not consent to these videos being shared and so that in itself requires investigation.
The only way Napa can be in any trouble would be if he shared it without her consent, which is a stretch. Why would a player leak their own sex tape. That’s pretty dumb, even for an NRL player. If either of them are going to release it, it’s more likely her, seeing as how you can’t see her face. Revenge porn is a big thing atm. But she could be totally innocent to, and a third party could have gotten their hands on it, which would mean there is no story (no story meaning no scandal of an NRL player doing anything wrong)
I don’t think that Napa is the sharpest tool in the shed.
I think you're being polite.

Post Reply