More bad behaviour

Wests Tigers Discussion
User avatar
TigerTiger
Member
Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Tue 13 Jun, 2017 4:56 pm

Re: More bad behaviour

Post by TigerTiger » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 4:17 pm

Of course it's Bulldog enforcer, not ex-Rooster. And Bulldogs come out and say yeah it's from a few years ago.

But yeah, I don't see the story. There was no consensual question raised, and no group thing, so who cares?

As long as it wasn't an undeclared TPA 'payment' organised by the Roosters. If that was the case, go get 'em Toddy.
A one eyed supporter, mostly :crazy, always :sign:


User avatar
the third
Member
Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed 01 Sep, 2010 10:55 pm
Location: here and there

Post by the third » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 4:19 pm

If the woman comes out and says she didn’t agree to it being filmed/shared it’s a problem

Snake
Member
Member
Posts: 5267
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 5:37 pm

Post by Snake » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 4:29 pm

Well there is a career for him after footy ! Hopefully the female gave consent for filming and distribution...I recall a law being introduced not long ago regard this .

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 23059
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 4:35 pm

the third wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 4:19 pm
If the woman comes out and says she didn’t agree to it being filmed/shared it’s a problem
What if he didn’t agree to it being shared?

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 23059
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 4:35 pm

snowleopard wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 3:49 pm
rumour is he was once again leading with his head...
Which one?


Abraham
Member
Member
Posts: 1283
Joined: Mon 25 Mar, 2013 1:09 pm

Post by Abraham » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 4:50 pm

Seen the full vid this morning ... definitely embarrassing for Napa. But no scandal to be found.

jadtiger
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 8:12 am
Location: bayview

Post by jadtiger » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 4:51 pm

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 4:35 pm
snowleopard wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 3:49 pm
rumour is he was once again leading with his head...
Which one?
Probably the only one which has no impact

Telltails
Member
Member
Posts: 2882
Joined: Fri 18 Apr, 2014 3:24 pm

Post by Telltails » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:03 pm

Mitchell Pearce was fined and suspended for lewd behaviour by the Integrity Unit due to a video being shared without his approval.
Pretty sure the NRL dont want videos of contracted players engaging in sexual acts being out there for all to see.

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 23059
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:31 pm

Telltails wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:03 pm
Mitchell Pearce was fined and suspended for lewd behaviour by the Integrity Unit due to a video being shared without his approval.
Pretty sure the NRL dont want videos of contracted players engaging in sexual acts being out there for all to see.
If Napa wasn’t responsible for it being leaked, why should he be in trouble. Pearce simulating sex with a dog is a bit different to Napa having consensual sex.

Telltails
Member
Member
Posts: 2882
Joined: Fri 18 Apr, 2014 3:24 pm

Post by Telltails » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:42 pm

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:31 pm
Telltails wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:03 pm
Mitchell Pearce was fined and suspended for lewd behaviour by the Integrity Unit due to a video being shared without his approval.
Pretty sure the NRL dont want videos of contracted players engaging in sexual acts being out there for all to see.
If Napa wasn’t responsible for it being leaked, why should he be in trouble. Pearce simulating sex with a dog is a bit different to Napa having consensual sex.
Pearce wasnt responsible for it being leaked either. It was a private party that he wasnt aware that he was being filmed at. Level of "lewd" is up to the individual to decide.

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 23059
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:52 pm

Telltails wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:42 pm
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:31 pm
Telltails wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:03 pm
Mitchell Pearce was fined and suspended for lewd behaviour by the Integrity Unit due to a video being shared without his approval.
Pretty sure the NRL dont want videos of contracted players engaging in sexual acts being out there for all to see.
If Napa wasn’t responsible for it being leaked, why should he be in trouble. Pearce simulating sex with a dog is a bit different to Napa having consensual sex.
Pearce wasnt responsible for it being leaked either. It was a private party that he wasnt aware that he was being filmed at. Level of "lewd" is up to the individual to decide.
It’s still different. Pearce simulated sex with an animal. A pretty embarrassing look for the game. Napa was having sex. Big deal.

WswWt
Member
Member
Posts: 814
Joined: Mon 11 Feb, 2013 1:27 pm

Post by WswWt » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 6:04 pm

Abraham wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 4:50 pm
Seen the full vid this morning ... definitely embarrassing for Napa. But no scandal to be found.
Not knowing you were being filmed? That’s illegal.

Telltails
Member
Member
Posts: 2882
Joined: Fri 18 Apr, 2014 3:24 pm

Post by Telltails » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 6:13 pm

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:52 pm
Telltails wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:42 pm
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:31 pm
Telltails wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 5:03 pm
Mitchell Pearce was fined and suspended for lewd behaviour by the Integrity Unit due to a video being shared without his approval.
Pretty sure the NRL dont want videos of contracted players engaging in sexual acts being out there for all to see.
If Napa wasn’t responsible for it being leaked, why should he be in trouble. Pearce simulating sex with a dog is a bit different to Napa having consensual sex.
Pearce wasnt responsible for it being leaked either. It was a private party that he wasnt aware that he was being filmed at. Level of "lewd" is up to the individual to decide.
It’s still different. Pearce simulated sex with an animal. A pretty embarrassing look for the game. Napa was having sex. Big deal.
Yes its different, but neither are images that the NRL would want being shared in public. Lets also not forget that there is another person in the video that may not have wanted that shared especially if people know who she is.

User avatar
WT2K
Member
Member
Posts: 4339
Joined: Thu 04 May, 2017 5:18 pm

Post by WT2K » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 6:14 pm

Apparently this napa thing happened 3 years ago.. Makes you wonder why it's surfacing now that he's no longer at the roosters
No more plodders!
:sign:

User avatar
WT2K
Member
Member
Posts: 4339
Joined: Thu 04 May, 2017 5:18 pm

Post by WT2K » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 6:15 pm

Tautau Moga charged with common Assault
No more plodders!
:sign:

User avatar
TigerTiger
Member
Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Tue 13 Jun, 2017 4:56 pm

Post by TigerTiger » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 6:16 pm

WswWt wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 6:04 pm
Abraham wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 4:50 pm
Seen the full vid this morning ... definitely embarrassing for Napa. But no scandal to be found.
Not knowing you were being filmed? That’s illegal.
I haven't heard that Napa didn't know he was being filmed. Even if so, that's a police matter. Unless the girl says she didn't want it released, there's no problem really for the NRL. That of course is if they were sane, which they are Not. So who knows.
A one eyed supporter, mostly :crazy, always :sign:

User avatar
TigerTiger
Member
Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Tue 13 Jun, 2017 4:56 pm

Post by TigerTiger » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 6:17 pm

WT2K wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 6:15 pm
Tautau Moga charged with common Assault
lol, wow. Another day, another NRL player in trouble.
A one eyed supporter, mostly :crazy, always :sign:

User avatar
WT2K
Member
Member
Posts: 4339
Joined: Thu 04 May, 2017 5:18 pm

Post by WT2K » Fri 11 Jan, 2019 7:06 pm

TigerTiger wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 6:17 pm
WT2K wrote:
Fri 11 Jan, 2019 6:15 pm
Tautau Moga charged with common Assault
lol, wow. Another day, another NRL player in trouble.
Heard briefly on the news that Mitchell Pearce also involved in an incident at one of Steve Roach sons wedding.
No more plodders!
:sign:

Post Reply