**Live game thread** Us vs the Panthers

tigerap
Member
Member
Posts: 2292
Joined: Tue 06 Oct, 2015 10:08 pm

Re: **Live game thread** Us vs the Panthers

Post by tigerap » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 12:15 am

Muffstar wrote:
pacman wrote:
Pawsandclaws wrote:I didn't see Lovett miss two one on one tackles for tries which Lawrence did. I cannot understand why Lovett cops it so much but Lawrence escapes criticism.
Lawrence also needs to go. His Defence is shambles.
Agree but don't be critical of Chrissy otherwise you will be shot down in flames.
Don't worry our defence coach for the last 3 years will be sacked at the end of the year


User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22384
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 9:08 am

pacman wrote:
Pawsandclaws wrote:I didn't see Lovett miss two one on one tackles for tries which Lawrence did. I cannot understand why Lovett cops it so much but Lawrence escapes criticism.
Lawrence also needs to go. His Defence is shambles.
He's here for another 3 years. Get use to it.

User avatar
foreveratiger
Member
Member
Posts: 12035
Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm

Post by foreveratiger » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 9:12 am

GNR4LIFE wrote:
pacman wrote:
Pawsandclaws wrote:I didn't see Lovett miss two one on one tackles for tries which Lawrence did. I cannot understand why Lovett cops it so much but Lawrence escapes criticism.
Lawrence also needs to go. His Defence is shambles.
He's here for another 3 years. Get use to it.
His not if the next Coach don't want him.
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22384
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 9:17 am

foreveratiger wrote:
GNR4LIFE wrote:
pacman wrote:
Pawsandclaws wrote:I didn't see Lovett miss two one on one tackles for tries which Lawrence did. I cannot understand why Lovett cops it so much but Lawrence escapes criticism.
Lawrence also needs to go. His Defence is shambles.
He's here for another 3 years. Get use to it.
His not if the next Coach don't want him.
The current coach doesn't want Farah. How's that working out?

hobbo
Member
Member
Posts: 10150
Joined: Mon 10 Mar, 2014 5:03 pm

Post by hobbo » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 9:25 am

GNR4LIFE wrote:
foreveratiger wrote:
GNR4LIFE wrote:
pacman wrote:
Lawrence also needs to go. His Defence is shambles.
He's here for another 3 years. Get use to it.
His not if the next Coach don't want him.
He has a contract though. The club has no right to move him on. Or is everyone only going to use that argument for one player?
Pay him out , he'll go .
Lawrence should of retired on the 28/3/2011
We need mongrel ..
No more plodders !


User avatar
foreveratiger
Member
Member
Posts: 12035
Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm

Post by foreveratiger » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 9:31 am

We all know he has a Contract , I think this might be Lawrence's last Contract with us just quietly.
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22384
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 9:48 am

foreveratiger wrote:We all know he has a Contract , I think this might be Lawrence's last Contract with us just quietly.
He'll be 31 by then anyway.

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22384
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 9:52 am

hobbo2803 wrote:
GNR4LIFE wrote:
foreveratiger wrote:
GNR4LIFE wrote: He's here for another 3 years. Get use to it.
His not if the next Coach don't want him.
He has a contract though. The club has no right to move him on. Or is everyone only going to use that argument for one player?
Pay him out , he'll go .
Lawrence should of retired on the 28/3/2011
They haven't had to pay players out in the past. I.e Galloway, Gibbs Heigno etc. Why is this any different?

hobbo
Member
Member
Posts: 10150
Joined: Mon 10 Mar, 2014 5:03 pm

Post by hobbo » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 10:03 am

GNR4LIFE wrote:
hobbo2803 wrote:
GNR4LIFE wrote:
foreveratiger wrote:
His not if the next Coach don't want him.
He has a contract though. The club has no right to move him on. Or is everyone only going to use that argument for one player?
Pay him out , he'll go .
Lawrence should of retired on the 28/3/2011
They haven't had to pay players out in the past. I.e Galloway, Gibbs Heigno etc. Why is this any different?
Galloway , Gibbs & Heigno were all wanted by other clubs .
Who would take lawrence ??
We need mongrel ..
No more plodders !

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22384
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 10:06 am

hobbo2803 wrote:
GNR4LIFE wrote:
hobbo2803 wrote:
GNR4LIFE wrote: He has a contract though. The club has no right to move him on. Or is everyone only going to use that argument for one player?
Pay him out , he'll go .
Lawrence should of retired on the 28/3/2011
They haven't had to pay players out in the past. I.e Galloway, Gibbs Heigno etc. Why is this any different?
Galloway , Gibbs & Heigno were all wanted by other clubs .
Who would take lawrence ??
Thanks for explaining why there are demands to pay Robbie out.

hobbo
Member
Member
Posts: 10150
Joined: Mon 10 Mar, 2014 5:03 pm

Post by hobbo » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 10:16 am

GNR4LIFE wrote:
hobbo2803 wrote:
GNR4LIFE wrote:
hobbo2803 wrote:
Pay him out , he'll go .
Lawrence should of retired on the 28/3/2011
They haven't had to pay players out in the past. I.e Galloway, Gibbs Heigno etc. Why is this any different?
Galloway , Gibbs & Heigno were all wanted by other clubs .
Who would take lawrence ??
Thanks for explaining why there are demands to pay Robbie out.
Taylor made it personal with Farah with his lack of cohesion BS story , hence the call to pay Farah out , instead of shafting him playing reserve grade ...big difference !
We need mongrel ..
No more plodders !

Eddie
Member
Member
Posts: 3569
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 3:05 pm

Post by Eddie » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 10:16 am

I have said it before signing Lawrence for 3 years was a year or two too many.

He might be 27 or 28 however has the body of a 32-34 year old.

He has been been playing first grade for 10 years and he looks beat up.

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22384
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 10:23 am

hobbo2803 wrote:
GNR4LIFE wrote:
hobbo2803 wrote:
GNR4LIFE wrote: They haven't had to pay players out in the past. I.e Galloway, Gibbs Heigno etc. Why is this any different?
Galloway , Gibbs & Heigno were all wanted by other clubs .
Who would take lawrence ??
Thanks for explaining why there are demands to pay Robbie out.
Taylor made it personal with Farah with his lack of cohesion BS story , hence the call to pay Farah out , instead of shafting him playing reserve grade ...big difference !
Not really. If it is personal, what proof is there that it's JT's doing, especially with Farah's recent history. Plus Farah is reportedly out of favour with those above JT too. If Farah was the cause of it being personal, why should the club feel obliged to pay him out?

Telltails
Member
Member
Posts: 2687
Joined: Fri 18 Apr, 2014 3:24 pm

Post by Telltails » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 10:31 am

Off topic?????

Tiger on the hill
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat 20 Aug, 2016 11:04 am

Post by Tiger on the hill » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 11:29 am

So far it's a case of Moses can't play if Farrah is on the park and now it appears from some comments he can't play with Brooks on the field. Who else should we pick or not pick so he can play ? Be careful what you wish for. Creating another monster ?

Russell
Member
Member
Posts: 5058
Joined: Sat 10 Dec, 2011 6:46 pm

Post by Russell » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 2:15 pm

Tiger on the hill wrote:So far it's a case of Moses can't play if Farrah is on the park and now it appears from some comments he can't play with Brooks on the field. Who else should we pick or not pick so he can play ? Be careful what you wish for. Creating another monster ?
Has Moses said that he can't play with his good friend of many years. They have not had any problems all through the lower grades.
Maybe this fairy story just fits your agenda. Let's just make it up eh!

I wouldn't be judging halves performance on last nights game. The forwards were totally dominated - no line speed, no aggression etc. We were very lucky they played as well as they did. He played like a champion - what did you want him to do - beat Penriff by himself?

goldcoast tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 6284
Joined: Sat 12 Apr, 2014 5:42 pm

Post by goldcoast tiger » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 2:29 pm

hobbo2803 wrote:
GNR4LIFE wrote:
foreveratiger wrote:
GNR4LIFE wrote: He's here for another 3 years. Get use to it.
His not if the next Coach don't want him.
He has a contract though. The club has no right to move him on. Or is everyone only going to use that argument for one player?
Pay him out , he'll go .
Lawrence should of retired on the 28/3/2011
If he doesn't want to go, of course the same would apply to him.

stevetiger
Member
Member
Posts: 5111
Joined: Mon 25 Feb, 2013 7:59 am

Post by stevetiger » Sat 20 Aug, 2016 2:32 pm

TIGER wrote:Ok let's sort out our problems right now. As bad as Rankin was tonight at the back it's not his fault, he's not a fullback. Those kicks he had to take were difficult, Teddy would of put a few down himself I dare say.
IMO we need to replace

Halatau (obviously)
Lovett
Brooks
Kevie
Grant

Controversial?
Those players you mention are keepers. It's not controversial. It is stupid.

Post Reply