Penalty before halftime

ImageImageImage
Kickoff: Friday 9 March 7:30PM
Venue:Bluetongue Stadium
Telecast: Ch9
Post Reply
User avatar
Yossarian
Member
Member
Posts: 9754
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Central Coast

Penalty before halftime

Post by Yossarian » Fri 09 Mar, 2012 10:22 pm

Did I miss something? At the ground it looked like an absolute stinker - looked like the Manly player was between our guy (Rhino?) and the ball runner? Glad we didn't go down by 2 points...


User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29572
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Fri 09 Mar, 2012 10:25 pm

Looked like Heighno only had eyes for the decoy/shepherder....he needed to milk the shepherd more

1/4 chicken,chips
Member
Member
Posts: 1638
Joined: Sat 30 Jul, 2011 10:28 am

Post by 1/4 chicken,chips » Fri 09 Mar, 2012 10:27 pm

one of those 50/50 calls imo. The Mnaly player took a dive ,got up when he knew he got the penalty.decoy ran straight at the defender.

PYMBLEPETE
Member
Member
Posts: 1037
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 9:15 pm

Post by PYMBLEPETE » Fri 09 Mar, 2012 10:28 pm

It was a very harsh penalty.

On replay you could see that Heighno did have eyes only for the decoy; but that is hardly the point. He was obstructed from making a tackle on the man with the ball and more than that he did not actually make a tackle on the decoy he did little more than collide with him.

Referees will decide a ridiculously high percentage of games this year.

1/4 chicken,chips
Member
Member
Posts: 1638
Joined: Sat 30 Jul, 2011 10:28 am

Post by 1/4 chicken,chips » Fri 09 Mar, 2012 10:30 pm

O well we got a call from the refs last week that evens up the ledger


User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29572
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Fri 09 Mar, 2012 11:00 pm

PYMBLEPETE wrote:It was a very harsh penalty.

On replay you could see that Heighno did have eyes only for the decoy; but that is hardly the point. He was obstructed from making a tackle on the man with the ball and more than that he did not actually make a tackle on the decoy he did little more than collide with him.

Referees will decide a ridiculously high percentage of games this year.
At the same time, bad read from Heighno and tackling a player without the ball is illegal
....he was a shepherd but at the time of the hit he legally hadnt obstructed...DCE hadnt continued his line.

User avatar
mtd
Member
Member
Posts: 2021
Joined: Thu 16 Jul, 2009 9:23 am

Post by mtd » Sun 11 Mar, 2012 11:48 pm

its was a horrible horrible decision... he had no other option but to tackle the guy.. the line the attacker was running, he was getting the ball... if he wasn't, it was going to be a sheppard... so heighno did the right thing... if he held back and didnt make a play at the man, and he ended up getting the ball and running straight through.. well we'd be slagging heigno for holding back...

no bias here either... if it was the other way round and we did the same play and manly tackled our player.. id also be calling for a penalty to manly... it was an absolutely pathetic decision..

happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 41161
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm

Post by happy tiger » Mon 12 Mar, 2012 12:01 am

Bad call no doubt , but that didn't effect the dropped ball by Humble the injuries to Ellis and Utai

Lets face it the refs are getting worse and worse and some weeks we get it go our way ,and some weeks it will be vice versa

But if we are a good enough team we should be able to overcome these obstacles most weeks

User avatar
simonthetiger
Member
Member
Posts: 3396
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:12 pm

Post by simonthetiger » Mon 12 Mar, 2012 12:37 am

mtd wrote:its was a horrible horrible decision... he had no other option but to tackle the guy.. the line the attacker was running, he was getting the ball... if he wasn't, it was going to be a sheppard... so heighno did the right thing... if he held back and didnt make a play at the man, and he ended up getting the ball and running straight through.. well we'd be slagging heigno for holding back...

no bias here either... if it was the other way round and we did the same play and manly tackled our player.. id also be calling for a penalty to manly... it was an absolutely pathetic decision..

X 2

User avatar
Juro
Member
Member
Posts: 2680
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 9:15 am

Post by Juro » Mon 12 Mar, 2012 11:17 am

It really was a line-ball decision. My preferred solution in those situations is for the ref to just call play on...
I've been a member since 2012. We last played finals football in 2011. Just saying...

User avatar
Tiger Watto
Member
Member
Posts: 10560
Joined: Mon 08 Mar, 2010 7:12 pm
Location: Maroochydore Qld

Post by Tiger Watto » Mon 12 Mar, 2012 11:24 am

50/50 for mine... The decoy runner only had the intention of running a whole, but Rhino needed to change direction to apply pressure on DCE. As a result Rhino put him on his bum, and if this was a try-scoring play, we wouldve recieve a penalty and No Try.

There is also plenty of rules in the book which highlight Rhino had no right to tackle the man without the ball, so we get some and we miss some.

It wasnt the reason they got 2 points!
"Did someone buy you the internet hero play book for Christmas and you've only just started reading it?" - Nelson 21/04/2017

User avatar
mtd
Member
Member
Posts: 2021
Joined: Thu 16 Jul, 2009 9:23 am

Post by mtd » Mon 12 Mar, 2012 3:00 pm

its not 50/50.. no way... its 100% wrong, 0% right...

heighington was forced to make a decision at full speed... he doesnt have the benefit of seeing the intentions of DCE or the ball runner in slow motion on a replay..

at full speed, 1 of 2 things were going to happen:
1. the ball runner gets the ball and heighington makes the tackle
2. its a sheppard... as a result a player is incorrectly tackled.. however, the 'illegal' tackle never occurs if they never performed the illegal sheppard to begin with...

it was wrong to penalise us... wrong wrong wrong... if DCE conceeds the tackle and its play on, sweet i have no issue with that... but there is no way we should have been penalised...

we may as well employ these sheppard plays as a tactic if this is the rule.... just get opposition players to tackle our guys without the ball (just before we perform a sheppard) and milk a penalty...

common sense needs to be used....

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29572
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Mon 12 Mar, 2012 4:23 pm

Tiger Watto wrote:50/50 for mine... The decoy runner only had the intention of running a whole, but Rhino needed to change direction to apply pressure on DCE. As a result Rhino put him on his bum, and if this was a try-scoring play, we wouldve recieve a penalty and No Try.

There is also plenty of rules in the book which highlight Rhino had no right to tackle the man without the ball, so we get some and we miss some.

It wasnt the reason they got 2 points!
Correct....its a 50/50...but a great decoy run and a poor read from Heighno

Post Reply