Jason Taylor says....

ImageImageImage
Post Reply
shiretiger
Member
Member
Posts: 358
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 6:57 pm
Location: The Shire

Jason Taylor says....

Post by shiretiger » Fri 13 Jul, 2012 10:12 am

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 21z06.html
Last week against the Wests Tigers, four of the Bulldogs' six tries were scored using illegal obstruction plays.
So we were dudded afterall.

:deadhorse:


User avatar
cktiger
Member
Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: Fri 12 Nov, 2010 10:37 am

Post by cktiger » Fri 13 Jul, 2012 11:04 am

I will be taking that article with me to my club tonight - proves everything I was going berserk about last week. :D

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29218
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Fri 13 Jul, 2012 11:06 am

Look at the (Boyds try I think it was) in Origin III from the head on angle...thurston recieves the ball on Thaidays left (thaiday decoy) runs behind him to his right, when the defender is blind to thurston getting it.
Thurston then makes long break near the touchline...they eventually score

A good example of how tough it is for defenses to read these plays

yeti
Member
Member
Posts: 1391
Joined: Tue 08 Nov, 2011 5:38 pm

Post by yeti » Fri 13 Jul, 2012 11:18 am

That's a great article from Taylor. This rule needs to be black and white. If a player with the ball runs behind his own teammate then a penalty needs to be given. If you leave it to refs to decide whether an 'advantage' has been gained then you are leaving yourself wide open to individual's interpretations and opinions and therefore the inevitable inconsistencies. If the rule is black and white, there can be no arguments from anyone. End of story.

User avatar
mtd
Member
Member
Posts: 2012
Joined: Thu 16 Jul, 2009 9:23 am

Post by mtd » Fri 13 Jul, 2012 2:49 pm

get taylor to replace harrigan the muppet. he is a as useful as ice to an eskimo.


User avatar
Stripes96
Member
Member
Posts: 545
Joined: Thu 08 Mar, 2012 8:58 pm
Location: Where the folks who know about frostiness stay frostiest the most

Post by Stripes96 » Fri 13 Jul, 2012 5:11 pm

Actually, I believe Eskimos build their houses out of ice


Posted using RoarFEED 2012
Image

tig_prmz
Member
Member
Posts: 7996
Joined: Sat 03 Oct, 2009 10:32 pm

Post by tig_prmz » Fri 13 Jul, 2012 5:39 pm

WOW !
My Round 1 Team 2018

1. lolo 2. noffa 3. suli 4. milne 5. fonua
6. reynolds 7. brooks
8. packer 9. ET 10. Twal
11. McQuen 12. Lawrence 13. Eiso
14. Matulino 15. McIllwrick 16. Sue 17. Aloiai
18. Marsters 19. Benji 20. Grant 21. K Naiqama
Next: Liddle, MCK, Felise, MWZ, Thompson, Rochow, Gamble

User avatar
diedpretty
Member
Member
Posts: 2635
Joined: Thu 16 Jul, 2009 7:31 am
Location: port macquarie

Post by diedpretty » Fri 20 Jul, 2012 4:33 pm

yeti wrote:That's a great article from Taylor. This rule needs to be black and white. If a player with the ball runs behind his own teammate then a penalty needs to be given. If you leave it to refs to decide whether an 'advantage' has been gained then you are leaving yourself wide open to individual's interpretations and opinions and therefore the inevitable inconsistencies. If the rule is black and white, there can be no arguments from anyone. End of story.

Thats what it always was and as far as i know the rule still is that you can not run behind one of your own players to gain an advantage over the defence - the problem is now its up to the refs to decide if there has been an unfair advantage.

Post Reply