Tackle on Ryan without the ball.

User avatar
Posts: 1705
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 11:43 pm
Location: Central Western NSW

Re: Tackle on Ryan without the ball.

Post by Suzie-Q » Tue 04 May, 2010 11:03 pm

Geo. wrote:Boo hoo look at the scoreboard was what my Rorter supporting Son said to me....and I hadn't even said anything....

As crap as it was if Beau makes the very difficult catch it's a non issue....then again I'm sure Checkin would have found another way....
Is he grounded till he's 35? Actually, smeg's way would be more effective ;)

User avatar
Posts: 10825
Joined: Sun 19 Jul, 2009 4:16 pm
Location: Cairns

Post by stryker » Tue 04 May, 2010 11:16 pm

Aladinsane wrote:100% NO TRY .......and in the refs training meeting regarding that" try", all the refs agree except for one , that it was a mistake to award it as a try .....we were robbed again for those 2 vital points

Dude.......Cmon now...we robbed ourselves with our ineptness.

I will not blame that try for us losing that game.

User avatar
Long Distance Tiger
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri 21 Aug, 2009 12:18 pm

Post by Long Distance Tiger » Wed 05 May, 2010 7:40 am

Quite right Stryker. As I said previously, we should have been ahead by at least 20. If we'd been able to capitalise on the opportunities we had, the final try would have meant diddly squat!!

User avatar
matty tiepie
Posts: 528
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 8:04 am

Post by matty tiepie » Wed 05 May, 2010 8:05 am

yes we should have won by plenty but that does not take away the fact that we were still very unlucky with that being given a try. i bet if the situation was the other way around it would have been given no try as we dont seem to get many 50 50 decisions.

User avatar
Posts: 3413
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:12 pm

Post by simonthetiger » Wed 05 May, 2010 8:20 am

So because we should have been in front by plenty its ok that a huge refereeing blunder costs us the game??

May as well add it was Sheens/Fitzy/Simmons.....not Folkesy's fault.


User avatar
Paris Cobbs
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 3:39 pm
Location: Paris, France.

Post by Paris Cobbs » Wed 05 May, 2010 9:41 am

Even if we had been 20 points ahead, it's six points against the for and against differential. Don't forget we missed the play-offs on for and against in 2007.

It absolutely was not a try. You can't barrel into someone without the ball, whether it's deliberate or not. We probably would have hung on for a win, which was what we needed even if it was meritless.
Cheering for the mighty Wests Tigers, all the way from France.

User avatar
Posts: 6051
Joined: Wed 07 Oct, 2009 4:22 pm
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney

Post by Spartan117 » Wed 05 May, 2010 10:59 am

In Summary most commentators online have agreed that the TIGERS were hard done by with that decission.

What can you do??? We should have been up by 12...

I reckon Sheens should Be Sacked....
UTT - Up The Tigers

User avatar
Posts: 834
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 12:58 pm

Post by IronTiger » Wed 05 May, 2010 11:45 am

Move along nothing to see here....