Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

[Tom Shines]

We are getting something in return, it is extra money about $400.00 for the rest of this year, and a further $1.2 ml for 2024 & 2045.
Total saving $1.6 ml.

Going by figures I have seen on WTF.

Do they ever end up spending this extra money?

No one wants to come here !

Maybe we will throw a million a year for Shaun Johnson to retire in style …he is old enough for them to offer a 4 year deal to..

 

[Eternal Tiger]

Who's talking about 2025-26? Ofanegaue's contract is 2023-25, so we're talking about next season and the one after that - so not "forfeiting" any seasons that aren't already gone. If you think Ofahenguae was the key link in our charge to the 2023 premiership why don't you just say that instead of making things up?

I don't, but if the alternatives are so impressive, why can't they replace him this week?
This reeks of 2022. Only a poorly run Club doesn't spend to it's Cap. We have a shit squad, but don't spend what were actually able to. To me, that's forfeiting. I know this because Sheens said we are "way under" the Cap for 2023 at the 10yr Member function at the COE.

 

[Mighty_Tiger]

I cant speak for @Tucker, but there hasn't been a whole lot to be positive about, for a long time. Everyone on here cheers for our side every week, some (myself included) are critical at the methods used to try and improve this Club.
The Club has done nothing so far to generate hope that we can avoid the Spoon again. Saving $$ for 2025-6 is forfeiting 2 more Seasons, which they've done consistently.

This. We’re meant to build a quality squad.
Letting a quality forward go when we have a bucket load of cash and roster spots with zero inbound committed for next season doesn’t sit well for me.

Sure 600k for a bench forward isn’t great but we have a few million in the kitty already that isn’t being filled.

Just hope I’m wrong and we see 4-5 players inbound for next season better than the players we have. Just Don’t see it which makes the Joffa move pointless.

 

[Tom Shines]

Please tell me this wasn't just another dumb decision

Why would they start to make smart decisions now after all this time?

Dumbest team in the comp off and on the field

 

[Tom Shines]

I agree with your first comment but also thinks it’s worth pursuing SJ on current form. Two years max.

They will need to pay him massive overs to get him to play out his final years in Sydney and not his home team … he really should see out his career in NZ..

 

[hank37w]

We are starting round 12 full comp is 27 rounds, so 15 rounds left, not quite half the comp is it old mate, but its parra, why would you quibble over parra paying maybe $100.000 more, who gives a tinkers cuss, anyway.
And articles I read were saying $600.000. And no matter if its $25 dollars we save money by letting a player go who is of no use to us whatsoever.

Just for the record, I believe the season payments start from 1st November, so a bit over half the contract season is gone, and the general consensus is that Joe is on 450k for 2023 and was to be 600k for 2024 and 2025.

As far as being of no use what so ever, he was still deemed useful enough to be named on the bench for round 12 and was deemed useful enough to be resigned only a matter of months ago.

As far as I am concerned there is a principle that needs to be applied here and that is that if we are in fact letting Joe go to Parramatta, he goes on our terms, for every dollar we can get out of them and when it suits us, and it is deemed that we do not need his services any longer.

What actually happens remains to be seen and what we currently do not know is if Parramatta is paying full freight and that we are not subsidizing this in any way and that if we have a run of injuries we have the players to step up to cover those injuries.

Going by recent history, I am not sure that I can be confident that what I have outlined above is what is actually happening.

 

[Tom Shines]

It does leave us lite for depth though. Hopefully they get this right.

Good teams don’t leave things to chance..

good teams would have had a replacement lined up before they let him go

 

[hank37w]

Conclusion: we are not a good team.

 

[Red88_Tiger]

If joe plays this weekend it’s a clear case that the club isn’t concerned by his character or if he gets injured and has to see out his contract
Is it just a last ditch effort to squeeze parra for more
Has there been another suitor jump in at the last minute

 

[Tucker]

Of course you will, you have never posted anything positive on here so why start now?

That’s not true at all, but I certainly don’t claim that the management of this club have “thoroughly thought through” a decision that has been made.
That is the sort of rose coloured view that allows the morons who signed Joffa 6 months ago, trade him out of the club, likely paying some freight because his high salary is now not consummate with his output….despite the coaching staff not giving him a proper run in the position that he became worthwhile to this side in only last year.

 

[2041]

I don't, but if the alternatives are so impressive, why can't they replace him this week?
This reeks of 2022. Only a poorly run Club doesn't spend to it's Cap. We have a shit squad, but don't spend what were actually able to. To me, that's forfeiting. I know this because Sheens said we are "way under" the Cap for 2023 at the 10yr Member function at the COE.

They want to free up the cap room for 2024-25 but Parra's offer is for now: they want Ofehangaue to shore up their bench this season, which is why they're desperate enough to offer to take that contract off us. Our young players are coming through and should be bolstering the squad in the next couple of seasons. This isn't a perfect match. But if we held on, would there have been an offer to take Ofehangaue on full freight at the end of the season? Quite possibly not.

You say "only a poorly run club doesn't spend to its cap" but I could just as easily say only a poorly run club spends its cap on dross just because that's what's there. Remember the last time we had cap room and we went out and spent it all in a roster management move known as "sign everyone who happens to be available right now"? How did Packer, Matulino, McQueen, Reynolds etc work out for us?

You have to ask yourself a few questions here:
- Are we going anywhere in 2023 to the extent that it's worth making future sacrifices to keep this specific roster together?
- Is Joe Ofehangaue on a contract that will deliver value over 2024-25?
- Could we have reasonable expectations of spending the money better elsewhere?
- Can we reasonably hope to cover what Ofehangaue offers on the park for less money in 2024-25?
- Can we reasonably assume there will be as good an offer as the one Parramatta are making now to take Ofehangaue's contract off us in the 2023-24 off season?

To me, the answers are no, no, yes, yes and no. On which basis letting him go is a no-brainer. It's fine that you think different, but "I want better players NOW" isn't a plausible basis for roster construction. Nor is "no-one will sign for us anyway so who cares about the cap". Basically, anything that is the equivalent of acting like a sulky pre-teen isn't the right way of going about constructing a successful roster.

 

[Tom Shines]

They want to free up the cap room for 2024-25 but Parra's offer is for now: they want Ofehangaue to shore up their bench this season, which is why they're desperate enough to offer to take that contract off us. Our young players are coming through and should be bolstering the squad in the next couple of seasons. This isn't a perfect match. But if we held on, would there have been an offer to take Ofehangaue on full freight at the end of the season? Quite possibly not.

You say "only a poorly run club doesn't spend to its cap" but I could just as easily say only a poorly run club spends its cap on dross just because that's what's there. Remember the last time we had cap room and we went out and spent it all in a roster management move known as "sign everyone who happens to be available right now"? How did Packer, Matulino, McQueen, Reynolds etc work out for us?

You have to ask yourself a few questions here:
- Are we going anywhere in 2023 to the extent that it's worth making future sacrifices to keep this specific roster together?
- Is Joe Ofehangaue on a contract that will deliver value over 2024-25?
- Could we have reasonable expectations of spending the money better elsewhere?
- Can we reasonably hope to cover what Ofehangaue offers on the park for less money in 2024-25?
- Can we reasonably assume there will be as good an offer as the one Parramatta are making now to take Ofehangaue's contract off us in the 2023-24 off season?

To me, the answers are no, no, yes, yes and no. On which basis letting him go is a no-brainer. It's fine that you think different, but "I want better players NOW" isn't a plausible basis for roster construction. Nor is "no-one will sign for us anyway so who cares about the cap". Basically, anything that is the equivalent of acting like a sulky pre-teen isn't the right way of going about constructing a successful roster.

They thought he played well enough last season to warrant a 3 yr extension signed 6 months ago.. a contract they expected to deliver value for three years..

Now last years grand finalist sees an opportunity to pick that contract up… do their coaches think they can get more out of him then our coaches? You would have to think so right?

 

[jadtiger]

I don't, but if the alternatives are so impressive, why can't they replace him this week?
This reeks of 2022. Only a poorly run Club doesn't spend to it's Cap. We have a shit squad, but don't spend what were actually able to. To me, that's forfeiting. I know this because Sheens said we are "way under" the Cap for 2023 at the 10yr Member function at the COE.

We don't have a "shit" squad but we certainly have "shit" management from the board down and "shit"coaching.I expected our squad to go about 11-13 as it is a reasonable but not outstanding squad.WE are not even close to achieving this but it is not the players at fault it is the [This word has been automatically removed]wits above them

 

[2041]

They thought he played well enough last season to warrant a 3 yr extension signed 6 months ago.. a contract they expected to deliver value for three years..

Now last years grand finalist sees an opportunity to pick that contract up… do their coaches think they can get more out of him then our coaches? You would have to think so right?

I absolutely acknowledge that the extension was, in retrospect, a mistake. Others have said it was given before we signed Klemmer, though, so there may be some rationale for it. But you have to deal with the situation as it is now. That contract was given, and now the Tigers have been offered an opportunity to undo the mistake. The stupid move would be to refuse to take that opportunity.

If you want to die on the hill of Parramatta's recruitment and retention being the model to follow feel free to do so. I'd suggest they're terrible at it and this reeks of a panic move from a club that can see its premiership window slamming shut. I guess time will tell.

 

[Eternal Tiger]

They want to free up the cap room for 2024-25 but Parra's offer is for now: they want Ofehangaue to shore up their bench this season, which is why they're desperate enough to offer to take that contract off us. Our young players are coming through and should be bolstering the squad in the next couple of seasons. This isn't a perfect match. But if we held on, would there have been an offer to take Ofehangaue on full freight at the end of the season? Quite possibly not.

You say "only a poorly run club doesn't spend to its cap" but I could just as easily say only a poorly run club spends its cap on dross just because that's what's there. Remember the last time we had cap room and we went out and spent it all in a roster management move known as "sign everyone who happens to be available right now"? How did Packer, Matulino, McQueen, Reynolds etc work out for us?

You have to ask yourself a few questions here:
- Are we going anywhere in 2023 to the extent that it's worth making future sacrifices to keep this specific roster together?
- Is Joe Ofehangaue on a contract that will deliver value over 2024-25?
- Could we have reasonable expectations of spending the money better elsewhere?
- Can we reasonably hope to cover what Ofehangaue offers on the park for less money in 2024-25?
- Can we reasonably assume there will be as good an offer as the one Parramatta are making now to take Ofehangaue's contract off us in the 2023-24 off season?

To me, the answers are no, no, yes, yes and no. On which basis letting him go is a no-brainer. It's fine that you think different, but "I want better players NOW" isn't a plausible basis for roster construction. Nor is "no-one will sign for us anyway so who cares about the cap". Basically, anything that is the equivalent of acting like a sulky pre-teen isn't the right way of going about constructing a successful roster.

You make some valid points, and I agree with 50% of your theory. But, were consistently releasing players for a rainy day, and were in a Semi Final drought. We were told that we would be playing an attacking brand of football, yet the Coach's didn't realise that the 6 and 7 they chose to move forward with, were incapable of delivering this plan. We have scored the LEAST amount of points in the NRL in 2023. Do you have faith in their ability to recruit the right players, we have looked inept for the majority of this year.

 

[Tom Shines]

I absolutely acknowledge that the extension was, in retrospect, a mistake. Others have said it was given before we signed Klemmer, though, so there may be some rationale for it. But you have to deal with the situation as it is now. That contract was given, and now the Tigers have been offered an opportunity to undo the mistake. The stupid move would be to refuse to take that opportunity.

If you want to die on the hill of Parramatta's recruitment and retention being the model to follow feel free to do so. I'd suggest they're terrible at it and this reeks of a panic move from a club that can see its premiership window slamming shut. I guess time will tell.

We should be the last team to criticise any other teams recruitment… particularly last years grand finalists and a team that has been successful the past few years.

You are saying it’s a “panic” move when they are just making the same decision the Tigers made six months ago…

He seems out of form admittedly …but he has been on the market for 5 minutes and the Eels have already jumped…

To let him go now seems an amateur move …should have waited until they had a replacement lined up even if that meant the off season.. we seem to be the ones that are panicking to let him go immeadiately because someone jumped to take him on..

 

[2041]

You make some valid points, and I agree with 50% of your theory. But, were consistently releasing players for a rainy day, and were in a Semi Final drought. We were told that we would be playing an attacking brand of football, yet the Coach's didn't realise that the 6 and 7 they chose to move forward with, were incapable of delivering this plan. We have scored the LEAST amount of points in the NRL in 2023. Do you have faith in their ability to recruit the right players, we have looked inept for the majority of this year.

I mean, sure - it's hard to disagree with that. On the other hand, some of this comes back to the same issue: you can only sign what's there. We went hard after the only game-changing half who was plausibly on the market for 2024 and if you want to put a positive spin on it we made him think very seriously about our offer - and made his current club up theirs - even though we were never favourites to get him. I find the crappiness of our halves intensely frustrating but we can't magic Jonathan Thurston out of thin air. I'm not particularly enthused by Shaun Johnson, Mitchell Pearce, Joel Schuster or any of these names - but those are the ones that might be available. It's a huge problem but I'm not sure I'm ready to blame the current setup at the club for not fixing it.

On the other hand, the recruitment we have done has largely been pretty good. I've never liked the Bateman signing but Klemmer and Koroisau are delivering pretty much exactly what we hoped for, and Papali'i is showing good signs.

I think a lot of this is beside the point, though. Even if our recruitment was universally dreadful it wouldn't mean letting the Ofahengaue contract go would be a bad move. It's not a sensible position to say that doing a reasonable thing to save money is a bad idea because "we'll only waste it anyway". Am I confident the Tigers are going to find a brilliant way to use 600k for the next two seasons? Absolutely not. Am I confident that spending 600k on Joe Ofehangaue for the next two seasons isn't a brilliant way to use money? Almost certainly.

 

[bptiger 0]

This is how I see this playing out , our gun forwards are going to look at this and say to themselves, we are going to have carry this team even more if the. Club keeps letting go of 1st grade quality, joffa may not be a gun forward to some but he is way ahead of what we can bring up from the useless nsw cup team , so unless the club have a player to bring in to show the gun players yes we are going to strengthen the team rather than make u blokes work harder I can see this blowing up in there faces

 

[2041]

should have waited until they had a replacement lined up even if that meant the off season..

But the offer wasn't for the off season - it was for now. Parramatta are desperate to shore up their bench forwards NOW because they fall apart when RCG and Paulo are off the field and they still think they can win a premiership. That's why they are willing to overpay for Ofehangaue - but it only applies now; in the off season they could find plenty of options to play bench middle.

If the Tigers have decided the Ofehangaue contract was a mistake it makes sense to unload it when there's an offer on the table. This might be different if we were battling for the finals or the minor premiership, in which case of course it would be foolish to weaken the roster even if it's for long-term gain. But you've seen the ladder, I assume.

 

[Kelce68]

I don't, but if the alternatives are so impressive, why can't they replace him this week?
This reeks of 2022. Only a poorly run Club doesn't spend to it's Cap. We have a shit squad, but don't spend what were actually able to. To me, that's forfeiting. I know this because Sheens said we are "way under" the Cap for 2023 at the 10yr Member function at the COE.

I reckon your arguments here have merit and a large part of me agrees with you, however, I'm still waiting to hear how you'd spend it.

Given the current market, in the current year, where are you spending this money that you're so critical of the club for not spending?