Looks to be playing injuredKen has a lot more work to do, but he’s having a swing.
Since round 1....
Can't wait till bye round.
Guy needs a break.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks to be playing injuredKen has a lot more work to do, but he’s having a swing.
Johns has a very high opinion of Madden and was disappointed the Knights lost him to WTs.Newcastle still keen on getting luke brooks up there
Of course it is, that's exactly what it is.Come on Jirskyr, I don't think you are reading my posts. I would not have bias against the team I wanted to win. So in those cases, where the ref is showing bias for the team I want to win, it is probably not my bias seeing only what I want to see.
A few of the boys seem to be struggling, pretty gutsy team atmLooks to be playing injured
Since round 1....
Can't wait till bye round.
Guy needs a break.
Interesting Madge said in tonight's press conference they tried to sign Nu Brown two years ago but he was injured and it didn't eventuate.
Madge seems to get his guy eventually. As seen with Naden who was chased late last year....
Maybe we'll get a few other missed players at some point...
Both of em?Bloke is a gun.
Just a guess, lol.
Not believing the drama.
Have heard the boys are off Kelma though.
Both of em?
You will pay? Ace, I'll inform the club.I'd happily pay 150-200K of the freight just to be rid of him. That way, we can actually go for a winger who has height, speed and at least half a brain when it comes to defence.
Solid would be the description I would use..Big fan of NU.
I have to watch replay for Madden was there live. Kick over the top was good.
How was naden?
It's 150-200k for 3.5 years isn't it?You will pay? Ace, I'll inform the club.
Id like to see him grab his opportunity and give the Tigers a real retention headache.Not a madden fan at all , but credit were credits due he had a good game tonight
not spectacular but in truth its day 3 in the squad.How was naden?
not spectacular but in truth its day 3 in the squad.
Saved a certain dufty break away try.
He's a big guy in the centers so Im glad he's here
I believe the referees are protecting momentum and are helping the favourites at the start of the game. I have noticed it in most games, mentioning that I also see it when it favours the team I am emotionally invested in indicates, to me at least, that it is not just me only remembering the decisions that go against my team.Of course it is, that's exactly what it is.
So by some mechanism the refs favour the teams you want to win, bias towards those teams you are backing, except when it's Tigers. Only happens in the wrong direction when you want Tigers to win.
It doesn't matter whether it's positive or negative bias towards TEAM X (whatever team), you are providing an anecdotal summary of a subset of games, recalled from memory and without verifiable data, and ignoring all the matches where the criteria you speak of don't exist (where you aren't backing any particular side).
What you are talking about doesn't really exist, but you are seeing things in results because you have an emotional investment in the outcome.
That was pretty impressive pace to chase down Dufty with easenot spectacular but in truth its day 3 in the squad.
Saved a certain dufty break away try.
He's a big guy in the centers so Im glad he's here
You are the one making the argument dude. You are absolutely correct that what you are saying probably cannot be proven with evidence - hence not much of an argument that you made in the first place.I believe the referees are protecting momentum and are helping the favourites at the start of the game. I have noticed it in most games, mentioning that I also see it when it favours the team I am emotionally invested in indicates, to me at least, that it is not just me only remembering the decisions that go against my team.
Neither of us can prove our point with evidence. It is subjective and every example is different, but straw man arguments and wildly twisting peoples words don't win any internet debates, they just damage your own credibility.