Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Terry T.Nuts said:
Exactly, if you banished all dirt bags from the NRL the competition would be over in a heart beat, they are players of an aggressive, brutal game not bloody care workers.
Click to expand...
Stryker, TNuts and me are the new coaches.
We'll start each game warm-up sessions with a rousing rendition of KumbayaO Lord, followed by warm ups of tunnel ball and a sprinkling of Ronnie Palmers Fairy Dust.
This is bound to get some mongrel into our team and send shivers down the spine of our opposition.
Are you ready for this, let's go tigers, let's go!
Clap clap. 👏

What do you reckon Nuts?
 
"There's not a player there he didn't sign or sign off on. He was on our retention committee - no decision was ever made without Michael's approval. None," Sheens said.
does that include signings in the last 12 months, following the boards decision to sack the coach?
 
stryker 69 said:
Our fans don’t know much about footy
Click to expand...

100%. You’ve got fools on here wanting to pass on players like Lodge because they think their personal experiences is more important than what’s best for the club .

Or you’ve got the morons who want to pass on players like A Critchon because the want to put their faith in our juniors, none of which will likely achieve even half of what A Critchon has.

Coincidentally, a lot of these people also think the club can do no wrong and it’s always the coaches fault. Bunch of simpletons whose footy knowledge wouldn’t fill an egg cup
 
Batmans Parents said:
100%. You’ve got fools on here wanting to pass on players like Lodge because they think their personal experiences is more important than what’s best for the club .

Or you’ve got the morons who want to pass on players like A Critchon because the want to put their faith in our juniors, none of which will likely achieve even half of what A Critchon has.

Coincidentally, a lot of these people also think the club can do no wrong and it’s always the coaches fault. Bunch of simpletons whose footy knowledge wouldn’t fill an egg cup
Click to expand...
We’ve had this discussion BP and the only fools I see are the ones that think one average prop will fix our team.
I try not to name call but seeing theres a lot of it going on I have joined in.
Still No to Lodge for me so I must be a fool, thanks BP and as Stryker put I also know nothing about footy because I don’t want him at our club.
 
Spartan117 said:
Got to hand it to them, Though.

The have smart and passionate people running their club.

The demand excellence of all in their organisation and players want to go there.
Click to expand...

So pretty much the anti-West Tigers. Another key difference is we have nuffy fans who thinks the club and board do no wrong
 
Buttface said:
We’ve had this discussion BP and the only fools I see are the ones that think one average prop will fix our team.
I try not to name call but seeing theres a lot of it going on I have joined in.
Still No to Lodge for me so I must be a fool, thanks BP and as Stryker put I also know nothing about footy because I don’t want him at our club.
Click to expand...

And once again, no one has claimed he will fix our team despite your previously ridiculous insinuation that we didn’t make the finals because of a rookie Lodge. But he would address a key part of it in which we are severely lacking in. If you can’t see that and want to continue to watch a bunch of low effort pillows in our forward pack, just say that.
 
Buttface said:
We’ve had this discussion BP and the only fools I see are the ones that think one average prop will fix our team.
I try not to name call but seeing theres a lot of it going on I have joined in.
Still No to Lodge for me so I must be a fool, thanks BP and as Stryker put I also know nothing about footy because I don’t want him at our club.
Click to expand...
I have nothing personal against Lodge.
But he did absolutely nothing for the Warriors - Or the Broncos before that...

What would he do for us?
More mongrel - More aggression - But still no wins.
He's not worth the money he's been getting and the game is heading toward much more mobile middles - Which he's not.

If we got him for good money and used him for a bit of bash n barge off the bench - Why not... But at 500+ (More likely 700+) It's a no from me - More of a FK NO!!
 
Buttface said:
We’ve had this discussion BP and the only fools I see are the ones that think one average prop will fix our team.
I try not to name call but seeing theres a lot of it going on I have joined in.
Still No to Lodge for me so I must be a fool, thanks BP and as Stryker put I also know nothing about footy because I don’t want him at our club.
Click to expand...

I think people are overrating Lodge. He also comes with baggage. So does Musgrove. I'm not totally against Lodge but I can't see him being the savior of our pack.

I hate when people state he has mongrel. It's a stupid concept. You need guys that break tackles and hit hard plus don't give away stupid penalties or drop the pill.
 
batboy said:
I have nothing personal against Lodge.
But he did absolutely nothing for the Warriors - Or the Broncos before that...
Click to expand...

This is the point. For some reason he gets overpaid. Meanwhile we get IP for 600k or something like that.

It's dumb business signing Lodge for a good sized contract. If you get him cheap but cheap would be like 300k.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 1,910 (members: 28, guests: 1,882)
Back
Top