Brooks $$ next year are inflated by agreeing to restrucure his contract a few years ago when we were trying to fund Ivans imbeciles(Packer/Reynolds/Mbye & co)
Brooks was actually trying to do the right thing by the club , and sacrificied some early years $$,but like all inflated back end contracts it looks bad at the end..particularly if he aint performing
Easy to identify his $$ initially forgone,& WTs shld take that into account with any payout
Having said that,it is Brooks who has instigated leaving early to start a new career elsewhere,so he needs to forgo some part of next years contract payment or endure the humiliation of playing reserve grade with WTs in 2023,cause thats undoubtedly where he'll be
WTs created this potential problem for him with a back ended contract,but his worsening performances made it everybodys problem and to fairly move him on end 22..assuming hes got a gig elsewhere??