Tucker
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2021
- Messages
- 7,661
I just told you, the sample data from when he was at lock is not big enough to provide an accurate result and conclusively state it was his better position.You don't bring up the games he played at Lock - Because the stats don't favour your narrative.
You can ignore them all you like.
He won 1/3 at lock - 1 win every 3.000000000 games
That's not delusion pal - That's maths... Google Check it if you like.
Should have won 2, But the team was certainly played better in all 3...
I'll wait for your evidence that shows we not only didn't win more when he was at 13,
But also "More Likely" (Your words) or closer to winning with him at 13.
You don't have any....