Tiger913
Well-known member
If there is a meeting today, good or bad, I just don’t think we hear anything on here today 🤷♂️
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could be a case of Moses coming to us with his final terms and whether or not we choose to accept it.If there is a meeting today, good or bad, I just don’t think we hear anything on here today 🤷♂️
Was there ever going to be any other style of play? I’m definitely not saying I disagree with it, in fact I love the approach...the opposition can’t score if they don’t have the ball, if you have the ball you should be looking at scoring opportunities etc, it’s an old Don Bradman approach. Just saying spare us the bullshit about playing a style which suits the players skill sets. Players who don’t have them will be weeded out and those who do will get better at them. Simple.1. Practice. Why did Puskas place the ball on the goal line, put his foot under the ball and repeatedly bounce it off the underside of the goal posts? First touch and ball control. Even the best require practice.
2. Sheens has commented that Laurie and Staines practice at 5/8 and wing respectively as well as fullback. I always believed an NRL player should be able to play at least two positions.
3. Ofahengaue is a prop and always has been. Just because Maguire played him at 13 does not mean he possesses the skillset to play that position. This is especially true if you are looking for you No 13 to play the link role. Marshall has commented on this already.
Which is ridiculous. It's not that hard to do it especially if you train non stop. Defences have got better of course but if you just play it out and get tackled then you are not going to win a premiership.I think the grubber for repeat sets has dropped off since the 7 tackle sets were introduced. The cross field bomb or simply playing out the set in good position seems to be favoured by teams as more options with less risk.
think the club would match it provided it isn't anything completely outlandish....for two reasons....Could be a case of Moses coming to us with his final terms and whether or not we choose to accept it.
Most of the players who do not fit imo have been weeded out of the roster.Was there ever going to be any other style of play? I’m definitely not saying I disagree with it, in fact I love the approach...the opposition can’t score if they don’t have the ball, if you have the ball you should be looking at scoring opportunities etc, it’s an old Don Bradman approach. Just saying spare us the bullshit about playing a style which suits the players skill sets. Players who don’t have them will be weeded out and those who do will get better at them. Simple.
Who’s going to concord to get the scoop? 🤣
FWIW, one of the conditions of Moses was the Tigers re-sign Brooks to at least 3+ years
FWIW, one of the conditions of Moses was the Tigers re-sign Brooks to at least 3+ years
FWIW, one of the conditions of Moses was the Tigers re-sign Brooks to at least 3+ years
and I don't have a problem with that.FWIW, one of the conditions of Moses was the Tigers re-sign Brooks to at least 3+ years
And, with al that, still more talented than Brooks.He is an average kicker, and can throw a decent pass, he is awkward to tackle . Against that, he also throws some terrible passes, has an overated and telegraphed kicking game, takes the wrong option on the edge, can't tackle and is a ball hog.
Good players want to play with good players. We increase the quality of the players in our team - Klemmer, Koroiseau, Papali'i', Bateman, Staines - we get better results. Win win.If there is the slightest bit of truth to what you say moses should have been told that he is a "player not an owner of the club" and immediately been told that he has no say in who plays for the club
Grub made the dogs top 30 squad. 🤔