tony soprano
Well-known member
Johnny or June?
On 🔥
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Johnny or June?
It just had to 😂Your posts in general don't annoy me, but you're flogging a dead horse on this particular point.
I scrolled past it for 6 weeks.
It had to be mentioned.
Oh, goodness me.What authority do you have to speak on the goals of the club? The goal is to field a competitive team and win. He is rightly pointing out they failed. Again. And again. And again……. It’s not me who needs to move on.
This must've been a late edit. I missed it in my original reply.😂😂😂 my issue is we are travelling so well, that we let a senior player go and didn't replace him in our squad.
Scroll past my posts if they annoy you. As I will with yours, which enable mediocrity.
By being satisfied by spending nowhere near our Cap limit (Sheens told us at 10yr Member function) I don't want to continue because the horse is already dead apparently.This must've been a late edit. I missed it in my original reply.
How exactly do my posts enable mediocrity?
If we need cap relief with the roster we have assembled there is something wrong. We shouldn’t be anywhere near the cap.You have been banging on about lack of replacements for released players for months.
Joffa in particular, you would have mentioned in nothing short of 20 comments, all the same, along the lines of 'we let Joffa go and replaced him with ______'
Surely you know that is not the way that these things work. A new signing is not contingent on a release and a release is not contingent on a new signing. The two have nothing to do with each other.
How often does a like for like replacement happen across the league?
People have spelled out, extremely clearly, that this release wasn't designed as a replacement, it was designed as cap relief for a bench player.
Ad nauseum.
Whether or not you agree with the decision is irrelevant, it was never designed as a replacement type signing, so why do you keep mentioning the same, tired, old copy and paste?
You made your incorrect point 6 weeks ago, let it go.
Salary cap flaw. Each team spends it, same amount (within 5%) however our clubs is actually worth about $5million and Penriths worth about $12million. But no issue with the mechanism apparently.If we need cap relief with the roster we have assembled there is something wrong. We shouldn’t be anywhere near the cap.
If there is no cap reason, then you don’t release a player unless you have someone to replace them, either inside the club or available to sign
I'm not satisfied.By being satisfied by spending nowhere near our Cap limit (Sheens told us at 10yr Member function) I don't want to continue because the horse is already dead apparently.
Accepting these actions is enabling wooden spoon Management.
Perhaps me using the term 'cap relief' was misleading...If we need cap relief with the roster we have assembled there is something wrong. We shouldn’t be anywhere near the cap.
If there is no cap reason, then you don’t release a player unless you have someone to replace them, either inside the club or available to sign
Then what's your view Innsaneink?Natural attrition
supposedly They have had our offer for days. If they were keen they would’ve signed by now. The longer this drags on the less likely. Dogs sign Sexton in 72 hrs, it takes WT 72 days, just to be told noView attachment 5830
Saw this pop up on my twitter feed. Looks like we should have a Fainu decision either way in the next couple of days.
What you suspect the club is doing is an example of them thinking too far ahead and taking their eye off the present. That present has a huge impact on our ability to recruit.The goal of all NRL clubs should be to remain competitive and win. I think that’s fairly important to point out after a 74-0 loss.
What you suspect the club is doing is an example of them thinking too far ahead and taking their eye off the present. That present has a huge impact on our ability to recruit and the on field failure undermines the very goal you suspect the club set out to achieve by releasing Joffa.
This club has not earned the right to simply release good players and expect that the cap relief will work out in it’s favour. There is a long history of the opposite actually materialising.
Four losses on the trot and an aggregate score line of 37-150 since releasing Joffa gives Eternal every right to make his point as often as he sees fit. In my opinion.
Telling people to move on, on a public forum, particularly when the club is in such a dire position is a bit rich. We are all here because we want the club to be successful. I suspect if we could move on we would have done it long ago.
View attachment 5830
Saw this pop up on my twitter feed. Looks like we should have a Fainu decision either way in the next couple of days.
No.
He has continued to argue for six weeks that Ofahengaue should've been replaced when the very goal of releasing him wasn't to find a replacement.
So it's a moot point.
Criticising the club for not achieving an outcome that they weren't trying to achieve is redundant.
And a buried issue.
Move on.
29 is my understanding currently, whether that changes with possible Talau movements I'm not sure.Joffa leaving we sit at 29 players right?
The deadline is coming and we have to have 30 players contracted right?
What a name what a flashback he was called the next big thing I remember a interview with him and his mum and it was an eye opener the mum was talking like he had played 100 first grade games and MOM in the GF it was crazy the cart before the horse 🐎 was miles InfrontWe have not had a youngster carry so much expectation since Jake Mullaney was carving up the 20’s
Flannagan would know from his time there before probably the same reason Griffin dropped him to reserve gradeIt's worrying that a talented player like Lomax appears unwanted by new head coach Flanagan. Got to be a good reason.