Fact is, in their current state, Leichhardt and Campbelltown grounds need urgent work for an NRL club to continue to play in those venues and deliver comfort to supporters, and a revenue stream for the club. The tough sell to government is WT play 5 matches in each. Manly and Penrith play 11 at Brookie and Penrith respectively.
Parra is a no go. From a capacity point of view, I reckon it could've worked if the Leagues club wasn't directly beside the joint, but the fact is, IT IS!! That venue is associated with Parra all day and night, and any other club - whether it be Canterbury, WT, or Penrith for the next two seasons - will be second rate citizens. It [This word has been automatically removed]ing irks me to think WT supporters use the club pre-game and pump money into an opposition club.
Olympic Stadium is the only real alternative for WT given the venue's location, and homogeneity in the NRL. But I hate the 4, 3, 3 split that the club has previously had. It confirms the nomads tag that the club has been labelled with.
Has Richo said anything about the Tamworth strategy and whether the club will continue with it at the end of the contract? Like the Leichhardt and Campbelltown strategy, that was the doing of the former management team, and wondering whether Richo and Mielekamp will support and persist with it.