I agree to an extent, but there should be a caveat for bush footy clubs outside the geographic footprint of any particular club.
If e.g. the Roosters had to compensate their lack of local juniors with developing juniors in e.g. western NSW that could be a good thing.
Agreed . There’s no trickle down economy in NRL , and as such it just leads to never ending exploitation.
The only way to ever fix this is a draft , with complexities around retention of juniors , trades etc.
the parasitic nature of certain clubs is really frustrating , and the problem with this is , because of their parasitic practices they’re at the pointy end of the table , and as such wield the most power to influence decisions in their favour .
Bush footy , and junior clubs never see anything for developing stars ,especially if the nrl club they’re developed for is us or a weaker club at the time of progression into the top grade .
It’s just take take take . Sure people like Gus Gould will advocate that the roosters do a lot for junior footy and development , which is simply farcical , when you consider they simply wait until other junior areas develop them until they’re 15 then poach away .
The latest atrocity is the Joseph Sualiii debacle .
And that’s not Robinson Crusoe . On an island by itself , that’s happening 10s of times every year across multiple junior bases .
People can say “you can’t force a player to go to X club “ and I say . That’s horseshit . If the players know. What they’re signing up for then that is simply not a factor .
They’re not cattle , and as such open to being exploited as such , but they also don’t adhere to contract law , and are constantly agitating through thier managers .
It’s a 1 way street with most clubs held over the barrel at any given time because they don’t have leverage if they’re outside of that moment in times big 4 .
The draft is simply the only answer , and as such nrl will be a shit show until that day.