Jayden "Bud" Sullivan #278

What i do not fully understand if our club did it's full background check they would have been told the same thing, Sullivan has talent but is inconsistent and not dedicated to be a professional player.
 
mtd#2 said:
I had high hopes for Sullivan. I think in the right environment he will thrive. Unfortunately he's been no where close to his best at the Tigers.
Click to expand...
Couldn't agree more, in time the club will get better at helping nurture and developing talent to help players improve their game. Unfortunately for Bud where the club is now is in a position where we need seasoned professional consistent first graders who don't need as much development just week to week support in their prep and fitness management, just to get us competitive and up the ladder. Once that happens the culture changes, the habits change and we can really start helping to develop players games.
 
Jay said:
Bizarre. I fail to understand the humor in the post, or why it would be posted at all.
Click to expand...
Can only think it was either true & then asked by the club to take it down as it hasn't been announced
or
One some warped crack at the Club for shopping his player who doesn't want to go.

Can't comprehend any other reason.
 
Great,

Sullivan is going to Hull and Naden is going with him. (if I read correctly).

Sullivan was a risk, a gamble signing. A total spare tyre once we signed Latu/Galvin/Sezer/etc.
I don't get how we sign a guy like that on BIG money for 4 years.

Maybe it was that if Sullivan proved to be a 800k+ player, we have him for 4 years.
Instead we seem to sign far too many unproven players on "potential". This isn't working and has to stop.
 
crazycat said:
Great,

Sullivan is going to Hull and Naden is going with him. (if I read correctly).

Sullivan was a risk, a gamble signing. A total spare tyre once we signed Latu/Galvin/Sezer/etc.
I don't get how we sign a guy like that on BIG money for 4 years.

Maybe it was that if Sullivan proved to be a 800k+ player, we have him for 4 years.
Instead we seem to sign far too many unproven players on "potential". This isn't working and has to stop.
Click to expand...
The 4 year term at top $$ for a guy who cldcnt make firsts
reeked of desperation,
 
Tigers_Wests said:
Was commenting on the injury only. If it was a Knee/ACL injury...then we would be stuffed and 0 chance of moving him on for 2025. Ankle should see him right for next year if there are any takers.
Click to expand...
I like ya last line, “Sell, Sell, Sell”
I’ve had few injuries over the years but never an ankle thank god, (sprained ankle maybe), it sounds painful an ankle injury.
Still, it’s not an easy sell, the DragQueens repaid us for Muzgrove.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 9,443 (members: 22, guests: 9,421)
Back
Top