Yeah that is true, however these guys are professionals. They’d train for this example and adapt quickly. The guys from the 50’s were not as multifaceted as todays elite athlete is. The block plays alone would result in a lot of tries.
I’m not so sure the modern players would adapt as quickly as you assume.
In the old days there was a genuine contest for the ball and the forwards spent a huge amount of time practising scrummaging.
Hookers were selected to win the ball. There were not many hookers in those days that were much in the ball running stakes, but that didn’t matter. Their job was to win the ball and defend in the middle.
I read Ian Walsh’s biography years ago. The shenanigans that went on in the scrums in those days was unbelievable. Those old timers were tough as nails and they knew how to play dirty. What’s more, the old-time front rowers had been practicing scrummaging since they were boys.
I don’t believe that a modern pack could just rock up after a few practice sessions and compete against a quality pack from the old days. I don’t believe they could compete.
The reason I emphasise scrums is that if you cannot win your share of the ball, you would struggle. Especially with unlimited tackles.
This was brought home to me as a small boy watching the Magpies v Balmain at LO. Our first hooker (Kelly) was unavailable and the replacement was getting a bath in the scrums. It didn’t take Balmain long to see what was happening. Balmain started kicking for touch, we would get the head and feed, and they would win the ball. Rinse and repeat up the field. When they got into our red zone, they held the ball (unlimited tackles) until they scored.
It is difficult to win a game of footy without the ball.
If I was the coach of an elite team from the old days versing a team of modern day players, that is the tactic I would use.
The modern day players would be favourites to win, but the old times might get close if they could starve them of the ball.