Not at all. I'll point out things I don't agree with too, but I also know there are probably 50% of others that view it a different way. The problem is they take one issue, that won't have more than 2-5% impact and turn it into the worst decision the club has ever madenin theor eyes and continue to bith and moan about it. I'm just saying show some balance. It's easy to rage about 1 or 2 things in isolation which then implys you can't find anything positive to discuss. It goes both ways no?
I mean...if you're being fair, many have said it's not working and we should burn the club down. Would you call this simply being critical or something else? Turning every tiny decision the club makes into a federal case damages the club and gives the media and bed wetters ammunition to cut us down. There are far more positives than negatives in my view.